Skip to main content
Log in

Marginality: scale determined processes and the conservation of the British butterfly fauna

  • Papers
  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Marginality describes the impact that environmental and landscape factors have in decreasing the probability of population survival and persistence. It may be imposed by extreme conditions or resource scarcity. Typically, it affects populations at the range edge but can also affect populations within the core of ranges, and produces a number of symptoms: characteristically demographic, but also morphological, physiological, biochemical and genetic. In this paper, the causes and effects of marginality on British butterflies are compared in edge and centre of range populations. Issues of temporal and spatial scales are examined, as is the relevance of marginality to the conservation of single and multiple species populations. The recognition of marginality questions the appropriateness of many so-called spatially realistic models of populations and highlights areas of research which have hitherto been ignored. Projected changes in land use and climate have implications for marginality in core and peripheral populations; in view of this, current scales of mapping are found to be unsuitable for monitoring fragmentation and the increasing marginalization of butterfly species in the British landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barr, C. (1994) Countryside survey 1990—an overview. Ecos 15, 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, K.D. (1990) Milankovitch cycles and their effects on species in ecological and evolutionary time. Paleobiology 16, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H. (1984) Relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124, 255–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H. (1988) Species diversity. In Analytical Biogeography (A.A. Myers and P.S. Giller, eds) pp. 57–89. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F.B. and Frydenberg (1974) Geographical patterns of four polymorphisms in Zaoarces viviparus as evidence of selection. Genetics 77, 765–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H. (1977) The British Butterflies: their Origin and Establishment. Faringdon: E.W. Classey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H. (ed.) (1992) The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H. (1993) Butterflies and Climate Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H. and Shreeve, T.G. (1989) Butterfly wing morphology variation in the British Isles: the influence of climate, behavioural posture and the hostplant habitat. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 38, 323–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H., Shreeve, T.G. and Williams, W.R. (1995a) Taxonomic differentiation in species richness gradients among European butterflies (Papilionidae, Hesperioidea): contribution of macroevolutionary dynamics. Ecography 18, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H., Shreeve, T.G. and Williams, W.R. (1995b) Affinity gradients among European butterflies: evidence for an historical component to species distributions. Entomol. Gaz. 46, 141–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H. and Williams, W.R. (1986) Butterfly ‘diversity’: regressing and a little latitude. Antenna 10, 108–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H. and Williams, W.R. (1994) Implications of biogeographical structure for the conservation of European butterflies. In Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies (A.S. Pullin, ed.) pp. 213–29. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H., Williams, W.R. and Shreeve, T.G. (1991) A multivariate approach to the determination of faunal structures among European butterfly species (Lep. Rhopalocera). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 101, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmes, G.W. and Thomas, J.A. (1992) Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats: interaction between Maculinea butterflies and their and hosts. Biodiver. Conserv. 1, 155–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K.J. (1994) Rarity. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K.J. and Lawton, J. (1988) Patterns in the abundance of insect populations. Nature 331, 709–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. and Hanski, I. (eds) (1991) Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. (1994) Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 131–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I and Thomas, C.D. (1994) Metapopulation dynamics and conservation. A spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 68, 167–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, P.B. (1994) Monitoring of selected butterfly species and their hostplant-habitats by 100 m2 units. Entomol. Gaz. 45, 159–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S. (1993) Metapopulations and conservation. In Large Scale Ecology and Conservation (P.J. Edwards, R.M. May and N.R. Webb, eds) pp. 111–52. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, A. and Higgins, K. (1994) Persistence of transients in spatially structured ecological models. Science 263, 1133–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld, R. (1989) Dynamics of Biological Invasions. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P. and Wennergren, U. (1995) Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373, 299–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostrowicki, A.S. (1969) Geography of the Palaearctic Lepidoptera. Krakow: Pantswowe Wydawnictowe Naukowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J.H. (1993) Range, population abundance and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 409–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J.H., Nee, S., Letcher, A.J. and Harvey, P.H. (1993) Animal distributions: patterns and processes. In Large Scale Ecology and Conservation (P.J. Edwards, R.M. May and N.R. Webb, eds) pp 41–5. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverton, R. (1994) The large white, Pieris brassicae L. (Lep., Pieridae) apparently univoltine in Bannffshire. Entomol. Rec. J. Var. 106, 190–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. (1974) The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, S. and May, R. (1992) Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nylin, S. (1988) Hostplant specialization and seasonality in a polyphagous butterfly, Polygonia c-album (Nymphalidae). Oikos 53, 381–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, M. and Warren, M.S. (1990) A Review of Butterfly Introductions in Britain and Ireland. Research and survey in conservation series. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. (1991) Changes in the flight period of the hedge brown butterfly Pyronia tithonus during range expansion. J. Anim. Ecol. 60, 737–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. Hall, M.L. and Bibby, T.J. (1986) Monitoring the Abundance of Butterflies, 1976–1985. Peterborough: Nature Conservancy Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. and Yates, T.J. (1993) Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, A.S. (1986) Life History Strategies of the Butterflies Inachis io and Aglais urticae, Feeding on Nettle, Urtica dioica. Ph.D. Thesis (CNAA), Oxford Polytechnic.

  • Rabonovitz, D. (1981) Several forms of rarity. In Plant Conservation (H. Synge, ed.) pp. 205–17. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, E.H. (1982) Aerography: Geographical Strategies of Species. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreeve, T.G. (1992) Monitoring butterfly movements. In The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain (R.L.H. Dennis, ed.) pp. 120–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreeve, T.G. (1994) Butterfly mobility. In Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies (A.S. Pullin, ed.) pp. 37–45. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreeve, T.G. and Dennis, R.L.H. (1995) Uniformity of wing spotting of Maniola jurtina (L.) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in relation to environmental heterogeneity. Nota Lep. in press.

  • Stevens, G.C. 1989. The latitudinal gradient in geographic range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. Am. Nat. 133, 240–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.D. (1994) Ecology and conservation of butterfly metapopulations in the fragmented British landscape. In Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies (A.S. Pullin, ed.) pp. 46–64. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.D. and Harrison, S. (1992) Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 437–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.D., Jones, T.M. (1993) Partial recovery of a skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) from population refuges: lessons for conservation in a fragmented landscape. J. Anim. Ecol. 62, 477–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C.D., Thomas, J.A. and Warren, M.S. (1992) Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92, 563–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.A. (1984) The conservation of butterflies in temperate countries: past efforts and lessons for the future. In The Biology of Butterflies (R.I. Vane-Wright and P.R. Ackery, eds) pp. 327–32. Symp. R. Entomol. Soc. London, no. 11, London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.A. (1993) Holocene climate changes and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies possess unnatural early successional habitats. Ecography 16, 278–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.A., Moss, D. and Pollard, E. (1994) Increased fluctuations of butterfly populations towards the northern edges of species' ranges. Ecography 17, 215–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. (1970) The distribution and nature of Pieris napi thomsoni Warren (Lep., Pieridae). Entomol. Rec. J. Var. 82, 255–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. (1980) Butterflies of Scotland: a Natural History. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.R.G. (1986) Why are there so few butterflies in Liverpool? Homage to Alfred Russell Wallace. Antenna 10, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.R.G., Gatehouse, C.M. and Corey, C.A. (1987) Does solar energy control organic diversity? Butterflies, moths and the British climate. Oikos 48, 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M.S. (1992) The conservation of British butterflies. In The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain (R.L.H. Dennis ed.) pp. 120–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M.S. (1993) A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain I. Protection, evaluation and extinction in prime sites. Biol. Conserv. 64, 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3, 385–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shreeve, T.G., Dennis, R.L.H. & Pullin, A.S. Marginality: scale determined processes and the conservation of the British butterfly fauna. Biodivers Conserv 5, 1131–1141 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051568

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051568

Keywords

Navigation