Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rationale and methods for the use of nude mice to study the biology and therapy of human cancer metastasis

  • Published:
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Human neoplasms are biologically heterogeneous. The extensive cellular diversity found in malignant neoplasms is generated by the rapid emergence of clonal subpopulations of tumor cells with different properties that include invasion, metastasis and responsiveness to treatment. Studies in rodent systems have indicated that cancer metastases can be clonal in their origin and that different metastases can originate from different progenitor cells from the primary tumor. This metastatic heterogeneity of tumor cells has many ramifications for studies of tumor biology, in general, and studies of therapy, in particular.

The heterogeneous nature of metastatic human neoplasms can now be studied under defined conditions in healthy athymic nude mice. The neoplasms must be free of mouse pathogens and the mice must be kept in specific-pathogen-free conditions. Careful consideration must be given to the intimate tumor-host relationship for each tumor system studied, because the metastatic potential of human neoplasms can vary with the site of implantation into nude mice.

Several methods for studying the biology of human neoplasms in the nude mouse are described as well as techniques to assure the success of these studies. The data show that the healthy young nude mouse can be a useful in vivo model for ascertaining the metastatic potential of human neoplasms, for selecting and maintaining cell variants of high metastatic potential from heterogeneous human tumors, and for studying therapeutic agents directed against metastatic cells proliferating in visceral organs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fidler IJ, Poste G: The heterogeneity of metastatic properties in malignant tumor cells and regulation of the metastatic phenotype. In: Owen A, Coffey DS, Baylin SB (eds) Tumor cell heterogeneity. New York, Academic Press, New York, 1982, pp 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fidler IJ, Hart IR: Biological diversity in metastasis and metastatic neoplasms: Origins and implications. Science 217: 998–1003, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heppner G: Tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 214:2259–2265, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fidler IJ, Poste G: The cellular heterogeneity of malignant neoplasms: Implications for adjuvant chemotherapy. Semin Oncol 12:207–222, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dexter DL, Leith JT: Tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance. J Clin Oncol 4:244–257, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paget S: The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. Lancet 1:571–573, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hart IR: ‘Soil and soil’ revisited: Mechanisms of site-specific metastasis. Cancer Met Rev 1:5–17, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Poste G: Experimental systems for analysis of the malignant phenotype. Cancer Met Rev 1:141–200, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Poste G, Fidler IJ: The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis. Nature 283:139–146, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nicolson GL: Organ colonization and the cell surface properties of malignant cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 695:113–176, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nicolson GL, Custead SE: Tumor metastasis is not due to adaptation of cells to a new organ environment. Science 215:176–178, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tarin D, Price JE, Kettlewell MGW, Souter RG, Vass ACR, Crossley H: Mechanisms of human tumor metastasis studied in patients with peritoneovenous shunts. Cancer Res 44:3584–3592, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fidler IJ: Selection of successive tumor lines for metastasis. Nature 242:148–149, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fidler IJ, Kripke ML: Metastasis results from preexisting variant cells within a malignant tumor. Science 197:893–895, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fidler IJ: The evolution of biological heterogeneity in metastatic neoplasms. In: Nicolson GL, Milas L (eds) Cancer invasion and metastasis: Biologic and therapeutic aspects, Raven Press, New York, 1984, pp 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Poste G, Fidler IJ: The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis. Nature 283:139–145, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Talmadge JE, Fidler IJ: Cancer metastasis is selective or random depending on the parent tumor population. Nature 27:593–594, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Talmadge JE, Fidler IJ: Enhanced metastatic potential of tumor cells harvested from spontaneous metastases of heterogeneous murine tumors. JNCI 69:975–980.

  19. Dorland WA: Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary: Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders & Co., 24th ed, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Talmadge JE, Wolman SR, Fidler IJ: Evidence for the clonal origin of spontaneous metastases. Science 217:361–363, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Talmadge JE, Benedict K, Madsen J, Fidler IJ: Development of biological diversity and susceptibility to chemotherapy in murine cancer metastases. Cancer Res 44:3801–3805, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fidler IJ, Gersten DM, Hart IR: The biology of cancer invasion and metastasis. Adv Cancer Res 28:149–250, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weiss L: A pathobiologic overview of metastasis. Semin Oncol 4:5–17, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weiss L: Metastasis: Differences between cancer cells in primary and secondary tumors. Pathobiol Annu 10:51–81, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fidler IJ: Metastasis: quantitative analysis of distribution and fate of tumor cell emboli labeled with 125I-5-iododeoxyuridine. JNCI 45:773–782, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luria SE, Delbruck M: Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics 28:491–511. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Talmadge JE: The selective nature of metastasis. Cancer Met Rev 2:25–41, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fidler IJ: General considerations for studies of experimental cancer metastasis. In: Bush H ed Methods in cancer research, Academic Press, New York, 1978, pp 399–439.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rygaard J, Povlsen CO: Heterotransplantation of human malignant tumor to nude mice. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [A] 77:758–760, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fogh J, Giovanella BC. The nude mouse in experimental and clinical research. Academic Press, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hanna N, Davis TW, Fidler IJ: Environmental and genetic factors determine the level of NK activity of nude mice and affect their suitability as models for experimental metastasis. Int J Cancer 30:371–376, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stiles CD, Desmond W, Chuman LM, Sato G, Saier HJJr: Relationship of cell growth behavior in vitro to tumorigenicity in athymic nude mice. Cancer Res 36:3300–3305, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sharkey FE, Fogh J: Considerations in the use of nude mice for cancer research. Cancer Met Rev 3:341–360, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Outzen HC, Custer RP: Growth of human normal and neoplastic mammary tissues in the cleared mammary fat pad of the nude mouse. J Natl Cancer Inst 55:1461–1463, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reid J.C., Shin SI: Transplantation of heterologous endocrine tumor cells in nude mice. In: Fogh J, Giovanella BC (eds) the nude mouse in experimental and clinical research. Academic Press, New York, 1978, pp 313–351.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Epstein AL, Herman MM, Kim H, Dorfman RF, Kaplan HS: Biology of the human malignant lymphomas III. Intracranial heterotransplantation in the nude, athymic mouse. Cancer 37:2158–2176, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Manning JK, Reed ND, Jutila JW: Antibody response to Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide and type III pneumococcal polysacchaaride by congenitally thymusless (nude) mice. J Immunol 108:1470–1472, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson WJ, Balish E: Macrophage function in germ-free, athymic (nu/nu), and conventional-flora (nu/+) mice. J Reticuleondothel Soc 28:55–66, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hanna N: Role of natural killer cell in control of cancer metastasis. Cancer Met Rev 1:45–65, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sordat B, Merenda C, Carrel S: Invasive growth and dissemination of human solid tumors and malignant cell lines grafted subcutaneously to newborn nude mice. In: Nomura T, Ohsawa N, Tamaoki N, Fujiwara K (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Nude Mice. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1977, pp 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fidler IJ: Kripke ML: Tumor cell antigenicity, host immunity and cancer metastasis. Cancer Immunol Immunother 7:201–205, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hanna N: Expression of metastatic potential of tumor cells in young nude mice is correlated with low levels of natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Int J Cancer 26:675–680, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hanna N, Fidler IJ: The role of natural killer cells in the destruction of circulating tumor emboli. JNCI 65:801–809, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hanna N, Fidler IJ: Relationship between metastatic potential and resistance to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in three murine tumor systems. JNCI 66:1183–1190, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hanna N, Fidler IJ: Expression of metastatic potential of allogeneic and xenogeneic neoplasms in young nude mice. Cancer Res 41:438–444, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hanna N, Schneider M: Enhancement of tumor metastasis and suppression of natural killer cell activity by B-estradiol treatment. J Immunol 130:974–980, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Talmadge JE, Meyers KM, Prieur DJ, Starkey JR: Role of NK cells in tumor growth and metastasis in beige mice. Nature 284:622–624, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Urdal DL, Kawase I, Henney CS: NK cell-target interactions: approaches toward definition of recognition structures. Cancer Met Rev 1:65–83, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pollack VA, Fidler IJ: Use of young nude mice to select subpopulations of tumor cells with increased metastatic potential from nonsyngeneic neoplasms. JNCI 69:137–141, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kyriazis A, DiPersio L, Michael JG, Pesce AJ: Influence of the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) infection on the growth of human tumors in the athymic mouse. Int J Cancer 23:402–409, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kindred B: Nude mice in immunobiology. Prog Allergy 26:137–238, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Povlsen CO, Fialkow PJ, Klein E, Klein G, Rygaard J, Wiener F: Growth and antigenic properties of a biopsyderived Burkitt's lymphoma in thymusless (nude) mice. Int J Cancer 11:30–36, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Giovanella BC, Yim SO, Morgan AC, Stehlin JS, Williams IJ: Metastasis of human melanoma transplanted in ‘nude’ mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 50:1051–1060, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Povlsen CO: Heterotransplantation of human malignant melanomas to the mouse mutant nude. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scan [A] 84:9–17, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kameya T, Shimosato Y, Tumuraya M, Ohsawa N, Nomura T: Human gastric choriocarcinoma serially transplanted in nude mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 56:325–333, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Nomura T, Ohsawa N, Tamaoki N, Fujiwara K (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Nude Mice. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Shimosato Y, Kameya T, Nagai K, Hirohaski S, Koide T, Hayashi H, Normura T: Transplantation of human tumors in nude mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 56:1251–1259, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kanzaki T, Hashimoto K, Bath DW: Heterotransplantation of human malignant melanoma cell lines in athymic nude mice. JNCI 62:1151–1157, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fogh J, Hajdu SI: The nude mouse as a diagnostic tool in human tumor cell research. J Cell Biol 67:117–125, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tompkins MB, Rao GV, Tompkins WAE: Increased tumorigenicity and resistance to antibody lysis of human colon tumor cells xenografted in congenitally athymic mice. Cancer Res 39:2160–2166, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Goldenberg D, Pavia R: In vivo horizontal oncogenesis by a human tumor in nude mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2389–2394, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Goldenberg D, Pavia R: Malignant potential of murine stromal cells after transplantation of human tumors into nude mice. Science 212:65–67, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Fidler IJ, Pollack VA, Hanna N: The use of nude mice for studies of cancer metastasis. In: Sordat B (ed) Immune deficient animals. Karger AG, Basel, 1984, pp 328–338.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kozlowski JM, Hart Ir, Fidler IJ, Hanna N: A human melanoma line heterogeneous with respect to metastatic capacity in athymic nude mice. JNCI 72:913–917, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kozlowski JM, Fidler IJ, Campbell DE, Xu Z, Kaighn ME, Hart IR: Metastatic behavior of human tumor cell lines grown in the nude mouse. Cancer Res 44:3522–3529, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Morrissey LW, Sidky YA, Auerbach R: Regional differences in the growth of tumor cells injected intraperitoneally into syngeneic adult mice. Cancer Res 40:2197–2201, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Auerbach R, Auerbach W: Regional differences in the growth of normal and neoplastic cells. Science 215:127–134, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  68. DeWys WD: Studies correlating the growth rate of a tumor and its metastases and providing evidence for tumor-related systemic growth retarding factors. Cancer Res 32:374–379, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kyriazis AA, Kyriazis AP: Preferential sites of growth of human tumors in nude mice following subcutaneous transplantation. Cancer Res 40:4509–4511, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kyriazis AP, DiPersio L, Michael GJ, Pesce AJ, Stinnett JD: Growth patterns and metastatic behavior of human tumors growing in athymic mice. Cancer Res 38:3186–3190, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Auerbach R, Morissay, Sidkey YA: Gradients in tumor growth: Nature 274:697–699, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  72. DeVore DP, Houches DP, Overjera AA, Dill GS, Hutson TB: Collagenase inhibitors retarding invasion of a human tumor in nude mice. Exp Cell Biol 48:367–373, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Takahashi S, Konishi Y, Nakatoni K, Inui S, Kojima K, Shiraton T: Conversion of a poorly differentiated human adenocarcinoma to ascites form with invasion and metastasis in nude mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 60:925–929, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Tarin D: Investigations of the mechanisms of metastatic spread of naturally occurring neoplasms. Cancer Met Rev 1:215–225, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Tarin D, Price JE: Influence of microenvironment and vascular anatomy on ‘metastatic’ colonization potential of mammary tumors. Cancer Res 41:3604–3609, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Sharkey FE, Fogh J: Metastasis of human tumors in athymic nude mice. Int J Cancer 24:733–738, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Witte PL, Ber R: Improved efficiency of hybridoma ascites production by intrasplenic inoculation in mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 70:575–577, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Giavazzi R, Campbell DE, Jessup JM, Cleary K, Fidler IJ: Metastatic behavior of tumor cells isolated from primary and metastatic human colorectal carcinoma implanted in different sites of nude mice. Cancer Res 46: 1928–1933, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Peters LC, Brandhorst JS, Hanna MGJr: Preparation of immunotherapeutic autologous tumor cell vaccines from tumors. Cancer Res 39:1353–1360, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Vose BM: Separation of tumor and host cell populations from human neoplasms. In: Reid E, Cook GMW, Moore DY (eds) Cancer cell organelles Horwood Ltd Publishers, Chichester 1981:, pp 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Sordat B, Ueyama Y, Fogh J: Metastasis of tumor xenografts in the nude mouse. In: Fogh J, Giovanella BC (eds) The nude mouse in experimental and clinical research Academic Press, New York, 1982, pp 95–147.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Sordat B, Wang WR: Human colorectal tumor xeno-grafts in nude mice: Expression of malignancy. Behring Inst Mitt 74:291–300, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Keller R: Elicitation of macroscopic metastases via surgery: Various forms of surgical intervention differ in their induction of metastatic outgrowth. Invasion Metastasis 3:183–192, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Stackpole CW: Distinct lung colonizing and lung metastasizing cell populations in B16 mouse melanoma. Nature 289:798–800, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Povlsen C, Rygaard J, Fogh J: Long-term growth of human tumors in nude mice: Evaluation of stability. In: Fogh J, Giovanella BC (eds) The nude mouse in experimental and clinical research Academic Press, New York, 1982, pp 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Wang WR, Sordat B, Piguet D, Sordat M: Human colon tumors in nude mice: Implantation site and expression of the invasive phenotype. In: Sordat B (eds) Immune-deficient animals Karger, Basel, 1984, pp 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Neulat-Duga I, Sheppel A, Marty C, Lacroux F, Pourrat J, Caveriviere P, Delsol G: Metastases of human tumor xenografts in nude mice. Invasion Metastasis 4:209–224, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  88. August DA, Ottow RT, Sugarbaker PH: Clinical perspectives of human colorectal cancer metastasis. Cancer Met Rev 3:303–325, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Giavazzi R, Jessup JM, Campbell DE, Walker SM, Fidler IJ: Experimental nude mouse model of human colorectal cancer liver metastases, JNCI In Press, 1986.

  90. Katsuoka Y, Baba S, Hata M, Tazaki H: Transplantation of human renal cell carcinoma to the nude mice as an intermediate of in vivo and in vitro studies. J Urol 115:373, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Hoehn W, Schroede FH: Renal cell carcinoma: Two new cell lines and a serially transplantable nude mouse tumor (NC 65). Invest Urol 16:106–114, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Otto U, Kollermann MW, Kloppel W, Dimegen J, Linden W, Rudiger H: Transplantation von menschlichem Nierenadenokarzinomgewebe auf die nackte maus. Urol Int 36:110–116, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Naito S, Kanamuri T, Hisano S, Tanaka K, Momose S, Kamata N: Human renal cell carcinoma: Establishment and characterization of two new cell lines. J Urol 128:1117–1122, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Otto U, Kloppel G, Baisch H: Transplantation of human renal cell carcinoma into NMRI nu/nu mice. I. Reliability of an experimental tumor model. J Urol 131:130–141, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Otto U, Huland H, Baisch H, Kloppel G: Transplantation of human renal cell carcinoma into NMR I nu/nu mice. II. Evaluation of response to vinblastine sulfate monotherapy. J Urol 131:134–140, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Clayman RV, Figenshau RS, Bear A, Limas C: Transplantation of human renal carcinomas into athymic mice. Cancer Res 45:2650–2656, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Naito S, Von Eschenbach AC, Giavazzi R, and Fidler IJ: Growth and metastasis of tumor cells isolated from a surgical specimen of a human renal cell carcinoma subsequent to implantation into different organs of nude mice. Cancer Res: in press, 1986.

  98. Bogden AE, Ketton DE, Cobb WR, Esber HJ: A rapid screening method for testing chemotherapeutic agents against human tumor xenografts. In: Houchens DP, Ovejera AA (eds) Proceeding of the symposium on the use of athymic (nude) mice in cancer research. Gustav Fischer Inc, New York, 1978, pp 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Bogden AE, Hoff DD: Comparison of the human tumor cloning and subrenal capsule assays. Cancer Res 44:1087–1090, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Canellos GP, Devita VT, Gold GL, Chabner BA, Schein PS, Young RC: Cyclical combination chemotherapy for advanced breast carcinoma. Br Med J 1:218–220, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Brambilla C, Delena M, Rossi A, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G: Response and survival in advanced breast cancer after two non-cross-resistant combinations. Br Med J 1:801–804, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Slack NH, Bross JDJ: The influence of site of metastasis on tumor growth and response to chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 32:78–86, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Donelli MG, Rosso R, Garattini S: Selective chemotherapy in relation to the site of tumor transplantation. Int J Cancer 2:421–424, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Donelli MG, Colombo T, Broggini M, Garattini S: Differential distribution of antitumor agents in primary and secondary tumors. Cancer Treat Rep 61:1319–1324, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Suzuki M, Hori K, Abe I, Saito S, Sato H: A new approach to cancer chemotherapy: Selective enhancement of tumor blood flow with angiotensin II. JNCI 67:663–669, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute, Houston, USA

    Isaiah J. Fidler

Authors
  1. Isaiah J. Fidler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fidler, I.J. Rationale and methods for the use of nude mice to study the biology and therapy of human cancer metastasis. Cancer Metast Rev 5, 29–49 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049529

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049529

Key words

Search

Navigation