Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between relative water content during reproductive development and winter wheat grain yield

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Water is often the most limiting factor to winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in the southern Great Plains of the U.S.A., yet the lack of reliable screening criteria has precluded direct selection for drought resistance in breeding programs. Previous work showed that leaf relative water content (RWC) was highly heritable when measured under field-drought conditions, but its adoption as a screening tool for yield improvement requires further investigation of the genetic relationship between grain yield and RWC. Plants representing high and low yield potential under drought stress, and a random group of plants, were selected from an F2 population having the pedigree, TAM W-101/Sturdy. Two sets of entries, each comprised of the two parents and 24 F2-derived lines, were evaluated under a rainshelter in the F3 (1986) and F4 (1987) generations to determine differences in leaf RWC during reproductive development. One set of entries did not receive any water after the jointing stage, and the other set was grown under well-watered conditions. A positive relationship was observed between grain yield and RWC measured during anthesis and mid-grain fill, as the high-yield selections maintained a significantly higher RWC than the low-yield selections. Grain yield and RWC were also positively associated among random selections segregating for both traits. Subsequent adjustment of genotype means for differences in reproductive development at time of sampling underscored the need to consider differences in maturity when RWC is the selection criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Begg J.E. & N.C. Turner, 1976. Crop water deficits. Adv. Agron. 28: 161–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett J.M., T.R. Sinclair, R.C. Muchow & S.R. Costello, 1987. Dependence of stomatal conductance on leaf water potential, turgor potential, and relative water content in field-grown soybean and maize. Crop Sci. 27: 984–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum A., 1985. Breeding crop varieties for stress environments. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 2: 199–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • CarterJr. T.E. & R.P. Patterson, 1985. Use of relative water content as a selection tool for drought tolerance in soybean, p. 77. In: Agronomy Abstracts. Crop Sci. Soc. America, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke J.M. & T.N. McCaig, 1982. Evaluation of techniques for screening for drought resistance in wheat. Crop Sci. 22: 503–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox T.S., J.P. Shroyer, L. Ben-Hui, R.G. Sears & T.J. Martin, 1988. Genetic improvement in agronomic traits of hard red winter wheat cultivars from 1919 to 1987. Crop Sci. 28: 756–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerherm A.M., K.E. Kemp & G.M. Paulsen, 1988. Wheat yield analysis in relation to advancing technology in the midwest United States. Agron. J. 80: 998–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerherm A.M., G.M. Paulsen & J.L. Sebaugh, 1984. Contribution of genetic improvement to recent wheat yield increases in the USA. Agron. J. 76: 985–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R.C., H.T. Nguyen & L.I. Croy, 1984. Osmotic adjustment and solute accumulation in two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Crop Sci. 24: 957–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matin M.A., J.H. Brown & H. Ferguson, 1989. Leaf water potential, relative water content, and diffusive resistance as screening techniques for drought resistance in barley. Agron. J. 81: 100–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1985. SAS user's guide: Statistics. 5th ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J.W., 1984. Genetic contributions to yield gains in wheat, pp. 89–101. In: W.R. Fehr (Ed.) Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of Five Major Crop Plants. Crop Sci. Soc. America, Spec. Publ. 7, Madison, WI.

  • Schonfeld M.A., R.C. Johnson, B.F. Carver & D.W. Mornhinweg, 1988. Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Sci. 28: 526–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons S.R., 1987. Growth, development, and physiology, pp. 77–113. In: E.G. Heyne (Ed.), Wheat & Wheat Improvement. 2nd edition. Crop Sci. Soc. America, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair T.R. & M.M. Ludlow, 1985. Who taught plants thermodynamics? The unfulfilled potential of plant water potential. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 12: 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadasse N., D. Reeves, T. Schumacher & L. Hall, 1988. Genetic variation of oat (Avena sativa L.) characters related to water-stress tolerance, p. 97. In: Agronomy Abstracts. Crop. Sci. Soc. America, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw I.F., 1966. The effect of water stress on translocation in relation to photosynthesis and growth. I. Effect during grain development in wheat. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 20: 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter S.R., J.T. Musick & K.B. Porter, 1988. Evaluation of screening techniques for breeding drought-resistant winter wheat. Crop Sci. 28: 512–516.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tahara, M., Carver, B.F., Johnson, R.C. et al. Relationship between relative water content during reproductive development and winter wheat grain yield. Euphytica 49, 255–262 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036297

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036297

Key words

Navigation