Skip to main content
Log in

Research evaluation and impact analysis of biological nitrogen fixation

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although viable Rhizobium inoculation technology for cultivated legumes has long been available, there has been little sustained adoption of this technology in tropical regions. Reasons contributing to this include inadequate demonstration of the technology, presence of adequate native rhizobia, high soil mineral nitrogen levels which suppress nitrogen fixation, inadequate quality control of Rhizobium inoculum and difficulties of inoculating under tropical conditions. In order to ensure a better adoption rate of existing or emerging biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) technologies, it is proposed that future research and development efforts better focus on the research-adoption-impact continuum. The salient features of this approach are described in this paper, using the example of recently developed nodulation variants in chickpea as a potential means of increasing BNF in this crop. It is suggested that previous experience with Rhizobium inoculation technology is amenable to ex-post impact analysis to analyze bottlenecks, and that ex-ante impact analysis should be built into on-going or planned BNF research, to better ensure that technology adoption occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bantilan M C S 1993 Technology adoption and economic assessment of on-farm adaptive research. In Approaches to On-farm Research in Asia: Summary Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on On-Farm Adaptive Research, 18–20 February 1993, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. pp 21–27. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bantilan M C S and Davis J S 1991 Across-commodity spillover effects of research and opportunity costs in a multi-product production environment. ACIAR/ISNAR Project Paper No. 30. Australian Center for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia/International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague, Netherlands. 24p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanaseni C and Kongngoen S 1992 Extension programs to promote rhizobial inoculants for soybean and groundnut in Thailand. Can. J. Microbiol. 38, 594–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Date R A 1977 Inoculation of tropical pasture legumes. In Exploiting the Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis in Tropical Agriculture. Proceedings of a Workshop, August, 1976. University of Hawaii, College of Tropical Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication No. 145. pp 293–311. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J S, Bantilan M C S and Ryan J G 1994 Development of information systems to support research decision making: An overall perspective. In Designing Information Systems to Support Priority Assessments in Agricultural Research: Concepts and Practices for International and National Institutions. Eds. J S Davis and J G Ryan. Monograph No. 17. Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Canberra, Australia. (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J S, Oram P A and Ryan J G 1987 Assessment of Agricultural Research Priorities: An International Perspective. Australian Center for International Agricultural Research, Monograph No. 7, Canberra, Australia.

  • Davis R J, Cady F B, Wood C L and Chan C P Y 1985 Design and analysis of an international experimental network: legume inoculation trials in the NifTAL Project, the INLIT experience. Research Series 042, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA. 43p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards G W and Freebairn J W 1984 The gains from research into tradeable commodities. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 66 (324), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper J E and Gibson A H 1984 Differential nodulation tolerance to nitrate among legume species. Crop Sci. 24, 797–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeswani L M and Baldev B 1990 Advances in Pulses Production Technology. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India. 190p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar Rao J V D K 1990 Pigeonpea: nitrogen fixation. In The Pigeonpea. Eds. Y L Nene, S D Hall and V K Sheila. pp 233–256. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H 1986 Mineral Nutrition in Higher Plants. Academic Press, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, London. 674p.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenney D W, Davis J S, Turnbull J W and Searle S D 1991 The impact of Australian Tree Species Research in China. ACIAR Economic Assessment Series No. 12. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra. 18p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton G W and Davis J S 1981 Evaluating returns to agricultural research: a review. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 63, 685–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie R J and Hybes R K 1993 Scientific and legislative control of legume inoculants for lentil and field pea. J. Prod. Agric. 6(4), 569–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughley R J and Pulsford D J 1982 Production and control of legume inoculants. In Nitrogen Fixation in Legumes. Ed. J M Vincent. pp 193–209. Academic Press, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupela O P and Johansen C 1992 Genetic variation for nodulation within chickpea cultivars. Paper presented in the Research Coordination Meeting of IAEA “The Use of Isotopes in Increasing the Yield and Nitrogen Fixation Capabilities of Common Grain Legumes in Asia”, 13–17 July 1992, Harbin, China.

  • Rupela O P and Johansen C 1994 Prospects for developing high mineral N tolerant N2-fixation in legumes—A proposal. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Commission IV, International Society of Soil Science, 1–3 Dec 1992, Dhaka, Bangladesh (In press).

  • Singleton P, Thies J and Bohlool B B 1992 Useful models to predict response to legume inoculation. In Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Sustainability of Tropical Agriculture. Eds. K Mulongoy, M Gueye and D S C Spencer. pp 245–256. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somasegaran P, Reyes V G and Hoben H J 1984 The influence of high temperatures on the growth and survival of Rhizobium spp. in peat inoculants during preparation, storage and distribution. Can. J. Microbiol. 30, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J A 1984 Production and quality control of carrier-based legume inoculants. Information Bulletin No. 17. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. 37p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J A 1991 Legume inoculant production and quality control. In Expert Consultation on Legume Inoculant production and Quality Control, Rome, 19–21 March, 1991. pp 15–32. FAO, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma L N and Bhattacharyya P 1992 Production, distribution and promotion of biofertilisers. In Fertilisers, Organic Manures, Recyclable Wastes and Biofertilisers. Ed. H L S Tandon. pp 132–147. Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organization, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bantilan, M.C.S., Johansen, C. Research evaluation and impact analysis of biological nitrogen fixation. Plant Soil 174, 279–286 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032252

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032252

Key words

Navigation