Skip to main content
Log in

Plantlet regeneration from petiole explants of the african horned cucumber, Cucumis metuliferus

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plantlet regeneration in Cucumis metuliferus from several explant sources, including cotyledons, leaves, hypocotyls and petioles, was evaluated on Murashige and Skoog's medium containing various combinations of auxin (IAA, NAA, 2,4-d) and cytokinin (BA, kinetin, zeatin), Callus development was obtained within 4 to 5 weeks on all growth regulator combinations which were tested at concentrations ranging from 1.0 μM to 4.0 μM of each. The response was similar when the tissues were incubated under light or in continuous darkness. Differentiation of callus to form adventitious buds or shoot primordia occurred only with petiole explants on medium containing NAA/BA or 2,4-d/BA at 2.0/1.0 μM; none of these calluses, however, differentiated further to form shoots. When the differentiated calluses derived from petiole explants which had been initiated on 2,4-d/BA at 2.0/1.0 μM were transferred onto medium with 2.0 μM zeatin, formation of shoots occurred within 2 to 3 weeks. The frequency of shoot formation was 14.6%. Subculture of these shoots onto MS medium without growth regulators gave rise to plantlets of normal appearance. Regeneration in C. metuliferus requires callus initiation on an appropriate growth regulator regime followed by transfer to a medium containing the cytokinin, zeatin, and can be achieved within 10–12 weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

6-benzylaminopurine

2,4-d :

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

IAA:

indole-3-acetic acid

NAA:

napthaleneacetic acid

References

  • Benzioni A, Mendlinger S & Ventura M (1991) Effect of sowing dates, temperatures on germination, flowering, and yield of Cucumis metuliferus. HortScience 26: 1051–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chee PP (1991) Plant regeneration from cotyledons of Cucumis melo ‘Topmark’. HortScience 26: 908–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabauza M, Roig LA & Moreno V (1991) Selective methods for the recovery of somatic hybrids of Cucumis melo × C. metuliferus and C. sativus × C. metuliferus. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep. 14: 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquinas-Alcazar JT & Gilick PJ (1983) Genetic Resources of Cucurbitaceae (p. 101). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources Bulletin, FAO/UN, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassuliotis G (1967) Species of Cucumis resistant to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita acrita. Plant Dis. Rep. 51: 720–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-G, Chang J-R, Cha HC & Lee K-W (1988) Callus growth and plant regeneration in diverse cultivars of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 12: 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy WH, Wehner TC & Daub ME (1989) Isolation and culture of Cucumis metuliferus protoplasts. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep. 12: 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orczyk W, Nadolska-Orczyk A & Malepzy S (1988) Plant regeneration of wild Cucumis species. Acta. Societ. Botanic Poloniae 57: 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provvidenti R & Robinson RW (1974) Resistance to squash mosaic and watermelon mosaic virus 1 in Cucumis metuliferus. Plant Dis. Rep. 58: 735–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punja ZK, Tang TA & Watkins LH (1988) Identification of resistance to root knot nematodes and virus diseases in Cucumis metuliferus and approaches to hybridization with Cucumis sativus by protoplast fusion. Phytopath. 78: 1578 (abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Punja ZK, Abbas N, Sarmento GG & Tang FA (1990) Regeneration of Cucumis sativus var. sativus and C. sativus var. hardwickii, C. melo, and C. metuliferus from explants through somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 21: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punja ZK & Raharjo SHT (1992) Regeneration of plants from protoplasts of Cucumis sativus L. (eucumber). In: Bajaj YPS (Ed) Plant Protoplasts and Genetic Engineering, Vol 3. Springer-Verlag Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub JE & Kupper RS (1985) Use of Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii germplasm in backcrosses with Cucumis sativus var. sativus. HortScience 20: 436–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang FA & Punja ZK (1989) Isolation and culture of protoplasts of Cucumis sativus and Cucumis metuliferus and methods for their fusion. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep. 12: 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner TC, Cade RM & Locy RD (1990) Cell, tissue and organ culture techniques for genetic improvement of cucurbits. In: Bates DM, Robinson RW & Jeffrey C (Eds) Biology and Utilization of Cucurbitaceae (pp 367–381). Cornell Univ Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raharjo, S.H.T., Punja, Z.K. Plantlet regeneration from petiole explants of the african horned cucumber, Cucumis metuliferus . Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 32, 169–174 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029839

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029839

Key words

Navigation