Skip to main content
Log in

Field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivar identification by electrophoregrams of cotyledon storage proteins

  • Variation-induction, Maintenance and Analysis
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Electrophoretic procedures were developed for seed proteins which can discriminate cultivars of field beans. Proteins were extracted from seven varieties and the extracts were analysed using acid and SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Electrophoregrams are presented to illustrate the results that can be obtained with the methods described. Results indicate that sufficient variation is present among the seven cultivars examined to afford unambiguous discrimation and identification of the cultivars. Banding patterns were stable for each genotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bassiri, A. & M. W., Adams, 1978. Evaluation of common bean cultivar relationship by means of isozyme electrophoretic patterns. Euphytica 27: 707–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushuk, W. & R. R., Zillman, 1978. Wheat cultivar identification by gliadin electrophoregrams. I. Apparatus, method and nomenclature. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58: 505–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), 1986. Bean Program Ann. Report 1985, pp. 1–6, CIAT, Cali, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmbach, A., R. A., Reisfled, M., Wyckoff & J., Zaccari, 1967. A procedure for rapid and sensitive staining of protein fractionated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 20: 150–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. M. & D. F., Grabe, 1986. Identification of cultivars of perennial rye grass by SDS-PAGE of seed proteins. Crop Sci. 26: 170–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. F., 1973. Chemosystematics in the classification of cultivars. p. 293–302. In: G., Bendz & J., Santesson (Eds), Nobel Symposium 25. Chemistry in botanical classification Proc. Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miège, M. N., 1982. Protein types and distribution. in: D., Boulter & B., Parthier (Eds), Encycl. Plant Physiol. N. S. vol. 14A p. 291–345. (eds.). Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapirstein, H. D. & W., Bushuk, 1985. Computer-aided analysis of relative mobility determination by using a three reference band standardization. Cereal Chem. 62: 372–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, N. F., 1983. Variation at isozyme loci in Phaseolus vulgaris. Ann. Rept. Bean Imp. Coop. 26: 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, N. F., 1984. Distinguishing among white seeded bean cultivars by means of allozyme genotypes. Euphytica 33: 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. F. & J. B., Beard, 1972. Electrophoretic identification of Agrostis palustris and Poa rratensis cultivars. Crop Sci. 12: 833–834.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Joint publication of the Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba (No. 747) and Centro Internacional de Agricultural Tropical-CIAT.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hussain, A., Ramirez, H., Bushuk, W. et al. Field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivar identification by electrophoregrams of cotyledon storage proteins. Euphytica 35, 729–732 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028580

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00028580

Index words

Navigation