Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative morphology of statocysts in the Plathelminthes and the Xenoturbellida

  • Sensory Structures
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The general fine-structural organization of statocysts in Catenulida, Nemertodermatida, Acoela, Proseriata, Lurus (Dalyellioida), and Xenoturbella are summarized. In lithophorous (statocyst-bearing) members of the Catenulida, the statocysts exhibit a few parietal cells and one or several movable statoliths within a spacious intracapsular cavity. Statocysts in the Nemertodermatida have several parietal cells and two lithocytes, each equipped with one statolith, whereas those of the other acoelomorphan taxon, the Acoela, always have two parietal cells and one movable lithocyte. The statocysts of lithophorous members of the Proseriata represent more sophisticated systems: each has two clusters of accessory cells in addition to several parietal cells and a voluminous lithocyte in which the statolith is movable. In catenulids and proseriates, processes of outer neurons penetrate the capsule of the statocyst, whereas such innervations have not been found in the Nemertodermatida and Acoela. I conclude that the different types of statocysts have evolved independently within the Plathelminthes. Xenoturbella displays an intraepidermal statocyst with many monociliary parietal cells and several mobile cells (‘lithocytes’) within the central cavity of the statocyst. Each of these mobile cells carries a statolith-like structure and one prominent cilium. The statocyst of Xenoturbella does not correspond to any type of plathelminth statocyst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ax, P., 1963. Relationships and phylogeny of the Turbellaria. In E. C. Dougherty (ed), The lower Metazoa. Comparative biology and phylogeny. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles: 191–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, U., 1985a. Das phylogenetische System der Plathelminthes. G. Fischer, Stuttgart, N.Y., 317 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, U., 1985b. Organisation der Statocyste von Retronectes (Catenulida, Plathelminthes). Microfauna Marina 2: 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, U. & B. Sopott-Ehlers, 1990. Organization of statocysts in the Otoplanidae (Plathelminthes): an ultrastructural analysis with implications for the phylogeny of the Proseriata. Zoomorphology 109: 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, E., 1973. A fine structural analysis of the statocyst in Turbellaria Acoela. Zool. Scr. 2: 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, E. A. & C. Bedini, 1991. Ultrastructural aspects of nervous system and statocyst morphogenesis during embryonic development of Convoluta psammophila Bekl. (Turbellaria, Acoela). Hydrobiologia 227/Dev. Hydrobiol. 69: 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, E. A., C. Bedini & A. Lanfranchi, 1985. An ultrastructural account of otoplanid Turbellaria neuroanatomy. II. The statocyst design: evolutionary and functional implications. Acta Zool. (Stockh.) 66: 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzén, A. & B. A. Afzelius, 1987. The ciliated epidermis of Xenoturbella bocki (Platyhelminthes, Xenoturbellida) with some phylogenetic considerations. Zool. Scr. 16: 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, V. P., Yu. V. Mamkaev & R. A. Pevzner, 1972. Electron microscopic study on the statocyst in the acoelan Turbellaria Convoluta convoluta. Zh. Evol. Biokhim. Fiziol. 8: 189–193. (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, E., 1950. Turbellaria Brasileiros (8). Bol. Fac. Filos. Ciênc. Let. Univ. São Paulo Ser. Zool. 15: 5–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, K. J. & L. R. Pedersen, 1986. Fine structural observations on the extracellular matrix (ECM) of Xenoturbella bocki Westblad, 1949. Acta Zool. (Stockh.) 67: 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisinger, E., 1960. Was ist Xenoturbella? Z. wiss. Zool. 164: 188–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, R., W. Sterrer, W. Salvenmoser & G. Rieger, 1990. Preliminary data on statocyst ultrastucture in the rhabdocoel genus Lurus (Turbellaria). Abstract of poster presented at The Sixth International Symposium on the Biology of the Turbellaria, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan, 7–12 August, 1990.

  • Rohde, K., N. Watson & L. R. G. Cannon, 1988. Ultrastructure of epidermal cilia of Pseudactinoposthia sp. (Platyhelminthes, Acoela); implications for the phylogenetic status of the Xenoturbellida and Acoelomorpha. J. submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 20: 759–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterrer, W. & R. Rieger, 1974. Retronectidae — a new cosmopolitan marine family of Catenulida (Turbellaria). In N. W. Riser & M. P. Morse (eds), Biology of the Turbellaria. McGraw-Hill Co., N.Y.: 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westblad, E., 1950. Xenoturbella bocki n.g., n. sp., a peculiar, primitive turbellarian type. Ark. Zool. (N. S.) 1: 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. II. Zoologisches Institut und Museum der Universität Göttingen, Berliner Strasse 28, D-3400, Göttingen, Germany

    Ulrich Ehlers

Authors
  1. Ulrich Ehlers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ehlers, U. Comparative morphology of statocysts in the Plathelminthes and the Xenoturbellida. Hydrobiologia 227, 263–271 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027611

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027611

Key words

Search

Navigation