Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of adaptation of barley, triticale, durum and bread wheat under Mediterranean conditions

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Yield data obtained from a comparative small grain cereals trial, grown for five consecutive growing seasons at a total of 23 environments in Cyprus, were subjected to regression analysis. Within each environment, yield trials consisted of a standard set of three cultivars or elite lines of barley, triticale, durum and bread wheat. The regression coefficient (b) of crop mean on the environmental index (I) and the mean square deviation from regression (sd2) were calculated for each crop. Each crop tended to have its own characteristic value of sd2 and its magnitude was an excellent indicator of specific crop-environment interaction. The causes of large sd2, for two of the four crops, were the susceptibilith of barley to lodging, when favourable conditions were encountered at high yielding environments, and triticale dependence on late season precipitation. Durum wheat and triticale had an average response to different yielding environments (b>1.19) and both were significantly different from those of bread wheat (1.08) and barley (0.54). Hence, barley, bread and durum wheat are specifically adapted to low, average and high yielding Mediterranean environments, respectively. The cultivation of triticale at the expence of durum wheat is not feasible. Furthermore, interactions between crops and environments demonstrated by the regression parameters, should constitute the basis for decision making, regarding crop adaptation in a region. The average yield in all environments should not be considered as a proper criterion for adaptation. In this study, triticale had a similar mean grain yield (3,842 kg/ha) to that of bread wheat, but was significantly higher yielding than barley or durum wheat (5 and 7%, respectively).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, S.A. & A.D.Bradshaw, 1964. Implications of genotype-environment interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 4: 503–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S.A. & W.A.Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S.A. & W.A.Russell, 1969. Yield and stability for a 10-line diallel of single-cross and double-cross maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 9: 357–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, K.W. & G.N.Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 14: 742–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjichristodoulou, A., 1984. Performance of triticale in comparison with barley and wheat in a semi-arid mediterranean region. Exp. Agric. 20: 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Neal F., 1952. Intra-varietal diversification in oat breeding. Agron. J. 44: 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V.A., S.L.Shafer & J.W.Schmidt, 1968. Regression analysis of general adaptation in hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Sci. 8: 187–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppa, L.R., K.L.Lebsock & R.H.Busch, 1971. Yield stability of selected spring wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.) in the Uniform Regional Nurseries 1959 to 1968. Crop Sci. 11: 238–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.S., M.R.Binns & L.P.Lefkovitch, 1986. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26: 894–899.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Josephides, C.M. Analysis of adaptation of barley, triticale, durum and bread wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Euphytica 65, 1–8 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022193

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022193

Key words

Navigation