Skip to main content
Log in

Blue light is required for survival of the tomato phytochrome-deficient aurea mutant and the expression of four nuclear genes coding for plastidic proteins

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When dark-grown aurea mutant tomato seedlings which lack more than 95% of the phytochrome present in isogenic wild-type seedlings are kept in white or blue light, four nuclear-encoded transcripts coding for plastidic proteins (the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein of photosystem I and II [cab-PSII], plastocyanin and subunit 2 of photosystem I) are present in comparable amounts. These transcript levels in red light are strongly reduced in aurea seedlings when compared with those of wild type. Thus, blue light is required for normal expression of these genes in the mutant, while red light alone is not sufficient. Red light-grown aurea seedlings are very sensitive to blue light, even 10 minutes of blue light every day suffices to cause a measurable increase in cab-PSII transcript level. The action of blue light on the expression of cab-PSII in the mutant is under phytochrome control. After 8 days of blue light, phytochrome is almost as effective in inducing cab-PSII mRNA as in the isogenic wild type, whereas after 8 days of red light, only a small phytochrome response was observed in the mutant. It is concluded that blue light sensitizes the mutant to the residual phytochrome which allows normal gene expression and survival of the mutant under daylight conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BL:

blue light

cab:

chlorophyll a/b-binding protein

Chl:

chlorophyll

FR:

far-red light

PSI:

photosystem I

PSI-2:

subunit 2 of photosystem I

PSII:

photosystem II

RL:

red light

WL:

white light

References

  1. Adamse P, Kendrick RE, Koornneef M: Photomorphogenetic mutants of higher plants. Photochem Photobiol 48: 833–841 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adamse P, Jaspers PAPM, Bakker JA, Wesselius JC, Heeringa GH, Kendrick RE, Koornneef M: Photophysiology of a tomato mutant deficient in labile phytochrome. J Plant Physiol 133: 436–440 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruce WB, Christensen AH, Klein T, Fromm M, Quail PH: Photoregulation of a phytochrome gene promoter from oat transferred into rice by particle bombardment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 9692–9696 (1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chappell J, Hahlbrock K: Transcription of plant defense genes in response to UV or fungal elicitor. Nature 311: 76–78 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fluhr R, Chua N-H: Developmental regulation of two genes encoding ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit in pea and transgenic petunia plants: phytochrome response and blue light induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 2358–2362 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffman NE, Pichersky E, Malik VS, Castresana C, Ko K, Darr SC, Cashmore AR: A cDNA clone encoding a photosystem I protein with homology to photosystem II chlorophyll a/b-binding polypeptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 8844–8848 (1987).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffman NE, Pichersky E, Malik VS, Ko K, Cashmore AR: Isolation and sequence of a tomato cDNA clone encoding subunit II of the photosystem I reaction center. Plant Mol Biol 10: 435–445 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaufman LS, Thompson WF, Briggs WR: Phytochrome-induced accumulation of RNA encoding the small subunit of RuBPCase requires ten thousand fold more red light than does the RNA for the chlorophyll a/b binding protein. Science 226: 1447–1449 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ken-Dror S, Horwitz BA: Altered phytochrome regulation of greening in an aurea mutant of tomato. Plant Physiol 92: 1004–1008 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koornneef M, Cone JW, Dekens RG, O'Herne-Robers EG, Spruit CJP, Kendrick RE: Photomorphogenetic responses of long hypocotyl mutants of tomato. J Plant Physiol 120: 153–165 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kronenberg GHM, Kendrick RE: Phytochrome: the physiology of action. In: Kendrick RE, Kronenberg GHM (eds) Photomorphogenesis in Plants, pp. 547–564. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lopez-Juez E, Nagatani A, Buurmeijer WF, Peters JL, Furuja M, Kendrick RE, Wesselius JC: Response of light-grown wild-type and aurea-mutant tomato plants to end-of-day far-red light. J Photochem Photobiol 4: 391–405 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marrs KA, Kaufman LS: Blue-light regulation of transcription for nuclear genes in pea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 4492–4495 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mohr H: Coaction between pigment systems. In: Kendrick RE, Kronenberg GHM (eds) Photomorphogenesis in Plants, pp. 547–564. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oelmüller R, Briggs WR: Intact plastids are required for nitrate- and light-induced accumulation of nitrate reductase activity and mRNA in squash cotyledons. Plant Physiol 92: 434–439 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oelmüller R, Mohr H: Mode of coaction between blue/UV light and light absorbed by phytochrome in light-mediated anthocyanin formation in the milo (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) seedling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 6124–6128 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oelmüller R, Kendrick RE, Briggs WR: Blue-light mediated accumulation of nuclear-encoded transcripts coding for proteins of the thylakoid membrane is absent in the phytochrome-deficient aurea mutant of tomato. Plant Mol Biol 13: 223–232 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parks BM, Jones AM, Adamse P, Koornneef M, Kendrick RE, Quail PH: The aurea mutant of tomato is deficient in spectrophotometrically and immunochemically detectable phytochrome. Plant Mol Biol 9: 97–107 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pichersky E, Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD, Breidenbach RB, Kausch AP, Cashmore AR: Molecular characterization and genetic mapping of two clusters of genes encoding chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Gene 40: 247–258 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharrock RA, Parks BM, Koornneef M, Quail PH: Molecular analysis of the phytochrome deficiency in an aurea mutant of tomato. Mol Gen Genet 213: 9–14 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Silverthorne J, Tobin EM: Demonstration of transcriptional regulation of specific genes by phytochrome action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 1112–1116 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oelmüller, R., Kendrick, R.E. Blue light is required for survival of the tomato phytochrome-deficient aurea mutant and the expression of four nuclear genes coding for plastidic proteins. Plant Mol Biol 16, 293–299 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00020560

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00020560

Key words

Navigation