Skip to main content
Log in

Engineering of the aspartate family biosynthetic pathway in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by transformation with heterologous genes encoding feed-back-insensitive aspartate kinase and dihydrodipicolinate synthase

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In prokaryotes and plants the synthesis of the essential amino acids lysine and threonine is predominantly regulated by feed-back inhibition of aspartate kinase (AK) and dihydrodipicolinate synthase (DHPS). In order to modify the flux through the aspartate family pathway in barley and enhance the accumulation of the corresponding amino acids, we have generated transgenic barley plants that constitutively express mutant Escherichia coli genes encoding lysine feed-back insensitive forms of AK and DHPS. As a result, leaves of primary transformants (T0) exhibited a 14-fold increase of free lysine and an 8-fold increase in free methionine. In mature seeds of the DHPS transgenics, there was a 2-fold increase in free lysine, arginine and asparagine and a 50% reduction in free proline, while no changes were observed in the seeds of the two AK transgenic lines analysed. When compared to that of control seeds, no differences were observed in the composition of total amino acids. The introduced genes were inherited in the T1 generation where enzymic activities revealed a 2.3-fold increase of AK activity and a 4.0–9.5-fold increase for DHPS. T1 seeds of DHPS transformants showed the same changes in free amino acids as observed in T0 seeds. It is concluded that the aspartate family pathway may be genetically engineered by the introduction of genes coding for feed-back-insensitive enzymes, preferentially giving elevated levels of lysine and methionine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arruda P, daSilva WJ: Lysine-ketoglutarate reductase activity in maize: its possible role in lysine metabolism of developing endosperm. Phytochemistry 22: 2687–2689 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azevedo RA, Smith RJ, Lea PJ: Aspartate kinase regulation in maize: evidence for co-purification of threonine-sensitive aspartate kinase and homoserine dehydrogenase. Phytochemistry 31: 3371–3374.

  3. Bevan M, Barnes WM, Chilton M: Structure and transcription of the nopaline synthase gene region of T-DNA. Nucl Acids Res 11: 369–385 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bittel DC, Shaver JM, Somers DA, Gegenbach BG: Lysine accumulation in maize cell cultures transformed with a lysineinsensitive form of maize dihydrodipicolinate synthase. Theor Appl Genet 92: 70–77 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boy E, Borne F, Patte JC: Isolation and identification of mutants constitutive for aspartokinase III synthesis in Escherichia coli K12. Biochemie 61: 1151–1160 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bright SWJ, Kueh JSH, Franklin J, Rognes SE, Miflin BJ: Two genes for threonine accumulation in barley seeds. Nature 299: 278–279 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bright SWJ, Miflin BJ, Rognes SE: Threonine accumulation in the seeds of a barley mutant with an altered aspartate kinase. Biochem Genet 20: 229–243 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bright SWJ, Shewry PR: Improvement of protein quality in cereals. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 1: 49–93 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bryan JK: Synthesis of the aspartate family and branched-chain amino acids. In: Miflin BJ (ed) The Biochemistry of Plants, vol. 5, pp. 403–452. Academic Press, New York (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cassan M, Parsot C, Cohen GN, Patte JC: Nucleotide sequence of lysC gene coding the lysine-sensitive aspartokinase III of Escherichia coli K12. J Biol Chem 261: 1052–1057 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Christensen AH, Sharrock RA, Quail PH: Maize polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation. Plant Mol Biol 18: 675–689 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen GN, Saint-Girons I: Biosynthesis of threonine, lysine and methionine. In: Neidhardt FC (ed) Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and Molecular Biology, pp. 429–444. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coruzzi G, Broglie R, Edwards C, Chua NH: Tissue-specific and light-regulated expression of a pea nuclear gene encoding the small subunit of ribulose-1.5-bisphosphate carboxylase. EMBO J 3: 1671–1679 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eggum BO, Brunsgaard G, Jensen J: The nutritive value of new high-lysine barley mutants. Cereal Sci 22: 171–176 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Falco SC, Guida T, Locke M, Mauvais J, Sanders C, Ward RT, Webber P: Transgenic canola and soybean seeds with increased lysine. Bio/technology 13: 577–582 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fluhr R, Moses P, Morelli G, Coruzzi G, Chua N-H: Expression dynamics of the pea rbcS family and organ distribution of the transcripts. EMBO J 5: 2063–2071 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Franck A, Guilley H, Jonard G, Richards K, Hirth L: Nucleotide sequence of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA. Cell 21: 285–294 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gallie DR, Lucas WJ, Walbot V: Visualizing mRNA expression in plant protoplasts: factors influencing efficient mRNA uptake and translation. Plant Cell 1: 301–311 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Galili G: Regulation of lysine and threonine synthesis. Plant Cell 7: 899–906 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ghislain M, Frankard V, Vandebossche D, Matthews BF, Jacobs B: Molecular analysis of the aspartate kinase—homoserine dehydrogenasegene from Arabidopsis thaliand. Plant Mol Biol 24: 835–851 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grant M, Bevan MW: Asparaginase gene expression is regulated in a complex spatial and temporal pattern in nitrogen-sink tissues. Plant J 5: 695–704 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Greve HD, Dhaese P, Seurinck J, Lemmers M, VanMontagu M, Schell J: Nucleotide sequence and transcript map of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid-encoded octopine synthase gene. J Mol Appl Genet 1: 499–511 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guilley H, Dudley RK, Jonard G, Balazs E, Richards KE: Transcription of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA: detection of promoter sequences, and characterization of transcripts. Cell 30: 763–773 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW: GUS fusion: beta glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6: 3901–3907 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karchi H, Shaul O, Galili G: Seed-specific expression of a bacterial desensitized aspartate kinase increases the production of seed threonine and methionine in transgenic tobacco. Plant J 3: 721–727 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karchi H, Shaul O, Galili G: Lysine synthesis and catabolism are coordinately regulated during tobacco seed development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 2577–2581 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kwon T, Sasahara T, Abe T: Lysine accumulation in transgenic tobacco expressing dihydrodipicolinate synthase of Escherichia coli. J Plant Physiol 146: 615–621 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Last DI, Brettell RIS, Chamberlain DA, Chaudhury AM, Larkin PJ, Marsh EL, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES: pEmu: an improved promoter for gene expression in cereal cells. Theor Appl Genet 81: 581–588 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lea PJ, Forde BG: The use of mutants and transgenic plants to study amino acid metabolism. Plant, Cell Environ 17: 541–556 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  30. McElroy D, Zhang W, Cao J, Wu R: Isolation of an efficient actin promoter for use in rice transformation. Plant Cell 2: 163–171 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  31. McElroy D, Blowers AD, Jenes B, Wu R: Construction of expression vectors based on the rice actin A (Act1) 5′ region for the use in monocot transformation. Mol Gen Genet 231: 150–160 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Muehlbauer GJ, Somers DA, Matthews BF, Gengenbach BG: Molecular genetics of the maize (Zea mays L.) aspartate kinase-homoserine dehydrogenase gene family. Plant Physiol 106: 1303–1312 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Munck L: The case of high-lysine barley breeding. In: Shewry PR (ed) Barley: Genetics, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, pp. 573–601 Biotechnology in Agriculture 5. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, UK (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Murray HG, Thompson WF: Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl Acids Res 8: 4321–4326 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Møller BL: Lysine catabolism in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Physiol 57: 687–692 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Richaud F, Richaud C, Rafet P, Patte JC: Chromosomal location and nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli dapA gene. J Bact 166: 297–300 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rognes SE, Bright SWJ, Miflin BJ: Feed-back-insensitive aspartate kinase isoenzymes in barley mutants resistant to lysine plus threonine. Planta 157: 32–38 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schledzewski K, Mendel RR: Quantitative transient gene expression: comparison of the promoters for maize polyubiquitin1, rice actin1, maize-derived Emu and CaMV 35S in cells of barley, maize and tobacco. Transgen Res 3: 249–255 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shaul O, Galili G: Increased lysine synthesis in tobacco plants that express high levels of bacterial dihydrodipicolinate synthase in their chloroplasts. Plant J 2: 203–209 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shaul O, Galili G: Threonine overproduction in transgenic tobacco plants expressing a mutant desensitized aspartate kinase of Escherichia coli. Plant Physiol 100: 1157–1163 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shaul O, Galili G: Concerted regulation of lysine and threonine synthesis in tobacco plants expressing bacterial feed-back-insensitive aspartate kinase and dihydrodipicolinate synthase. Plant Mol Biol 23: 759–768 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shaver JM, Bittel DC, Sellner JM, Frisch DA, Somers DA, Gegenbach BG: Single-amino acid substitutions eliminate lysine inhibition of maize dihydrodipicolinate synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 1962–1966 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Thompson CJ, Novva NR, Tizard R, Crameri R, Davies JE, Lauwereys M, Botterman J: Characterization of the herbicide resistance gene bar from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. EMBO J 6: 2519–2523 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wan Y, Lemaux PG: Generation of large numbers of independently transformed fertile barley plants. Plant Physiol 104: 37–48 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Weiseman JM, Matthews BF: Identification and expression of a cDNA from Daucus carota encoding a bifunctional aspartokinase-homoserine dehydrogenase. Plant Mol Biol 22: 301–312 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  47. White J, Chang SP, Bibb MJ, Bibb MJ: A cassette containing the bar gene of Streptomyces hygroscopicus: a selectable marker for plant transformation. Nucl Acids Res 18: 1062 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wilson BJ, Gray AA, Matthews BF: Bifunctional protein in carrot contains both aspartokinase and homoserine dehydrogenase activities. Plant Physiol 97: 1323–1328 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang W, McElroy D, Wu R: Analysis of rice Act1 5′ region activity in transgenic rice plants. Plant Cell 3: 1155–1165 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brinch-Pedersen, H., Galili, G., Knudsen, S. et al. Engineering of the aspartate family biosynthetic pathway in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by transformation with heterologous genes encoding feed-back-insensitive aspartate kinase and dihydrodipicolinate synthase. Plant Mol Biol 32, 611–620 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00020202

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00020202

Key words

Navigation