Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship of floods, drying, flow and light to primary production and producer biomass in a prairie stream

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Factors related to autochthonous production were investigated at several sites along a prairie stream at Konza Prairie Research Natural Area. Primary production, algal biomass, litter input, and ability of floods to move native substrate were measured. Additional experiments were conducted to establish the influence of light and water velocity on primary production rates and recovery of biomass following dry periods. The study period encompassed two extreme (> 50 year calculated return time) floods, thus we were able to analyze the effects of scour on periphyton biomass and productivity. Biomass of sedimentary algae was reduced greatly by flooding and did not reach preflood amounts during the 2 months following the first flood. Rates of primary production associated with sediments recovered to levels above preflood rates within 2 weeks. Biomass of epilithic periphyton was not affected as severely as that of sedimentary algae. Little relationship was observed between water velocity and photosythetic rates. Production reached maximum rates at 25% of full sun light. Epilithic chlorophyll levels recovered within eight days following a dry period, and chl a was an order of magnitude greater on rocks than sediments 51 days after re-wetting. Estimated annual rates of primary production were 2.6 times greater in the prairie than in the forest reaches of the stream. The ratio of annual autochthonous:allochthonous carbon input was 4.81 for prairie and 0.32 for the forest. Periphyton production in prairie streams is resilient with regard to flooding and drought and represents a primary carbon source for the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA, 1989. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, D. E. & S. C. Fisher, 1981. Metabolism of a desert stream. Freshwat. Biol. 11: 301–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, R. W., 1987. Floods in Kansas and techniques for estimating their magnitude and frequency on unregulated streams. United States Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 87–4008, 50 pp.

  • Dodds, W. K., 1991. Community interactions between the filamentous alga Cladophora glomerata (L.) Keutzing, its epiphytes and epiphyte grazers. Oecologia 85: 572–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, W. K. & D. A. Gudder, 1992. The ecology of Cladophora. J. Phycol. 28: 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. G., L. J. Gray, N. B. Grimm & D. E. Busch, 1982. Temporal succession in a desert stream ecosystem following flash flooding. Ecol. Monogr. 52: 93–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. G. & N. B. Grimm, 1988. Disturbance as a determinant of structure in a Sonoran Desert stream ecosystem. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angewandte Limnol. 23: 1183–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. G. & G. E. Likens, 1973. Energy flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: An integrative approach to stream metabolism. Ecol. Mongr. 43: 421–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelroth, J. V. & G. R. Marzolf, 1978. Primary production and leaflitter decomposition in natural and channelized portions of a Kansas stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 99: 238–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurtz, M. E. & C. M. Tate, 1988. Hydrologic influences on leaf decomposition in a channel and adjacent bank of a gallery forest stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 120: 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurtz, M. E., G. R. Marzolf, K. T. Killingbeck, D. L. Smith & J. V. McArthur, 1988. Hydrologic and riparian influences on the import and storage of coarse particulate organic matter in a prairie stream. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 45: 655–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, K. L., 1987. Factors affecting the nitrate removal potential of sediments from a tallgrass prairie stream. PhD dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 107 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, C. L., J. M. Briggs & M. D. Nellis, 1994. Expansion of gallery forest on Konza Prairie Research Natural Area, Kansas, USA. Landscape Ecol. 9: 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera, M. & S. Vogel, 1976. An inexpensive thermistor flow meter for aquatic biology. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 750–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, K. J., J. R. Jones & B. D. Perkins, 1992. Effects of nutrient enrichment and flood frequency on periphyton biomass in northern Ozark streams. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 49: 1198–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, W. J., 1988. North American prairie streams as systems for ecological study. J. No. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 387–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBrayer, J. F. & K. Cromack, Jr., 1980. Effect of snow pack on lake-litter breakdown and nutrient release in a Minnesota forest. Pedobiologia 20: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. G. & R. J. Stevenson, 1990. Post-spate development of epilithic algal communities in different current environments. Can. J. Bot. 68: 2092–2102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. G. & R. J. Stevenson, 1992. Resistance and resilience of lotic algal communities: importance of disturbance timing and current. Ecology 73: 1445–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. E. & A. J. Stewart, 1987. Disturbance and recovery of an algal assemblage following flooding in an Oklahoma stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 117: 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, C. M. & M. E. Gurtz, 1986. Comparison of mass loss, nutrients, and invertebrates associated with elm leaf litter decomposition in perennial and intermittent reaches of tallgrass prairie streams. Southwest. Nat. 31: 511–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, C. M., 1990. Patterns and controls of nitrogen in tallgrass prairie streams. Ecology 71: 2007–2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G. & G. E. Likens, 1991. Limnological Analysis, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., 1975. Communities and Ecosystems, 2nd edition. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dodds, W.K., Hutson, R.E., Eichem, A.C. et al. The relationship of floods, drying, flow and light to primary production and producer biomass in a prairie stream. Hydrobiologia 333, 151–159 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00013429

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00013429

Key words

Navigation