Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of four grazers on periphyton communities associated with clay tiles and leaves

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assessed the individual effects of three mayflies (Paraleptophlebia sp., Ephemerella subvaria McDunnough and Epeorus sp.) and one caddisfly (Psilotreta sp.) on periphyton communities associated with clay tiles and leaves. Algal densities were estimated for leaf discs and tiles from experimental chambers (with individual grazers) and control chambers (i.e., no grazers). Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of leaf discs and tiles also were taken for all mayfly grazing experiments. Densities of algae on leaf discs were two to five times lower than on tiles. Mouthpart morphology influenced how different insects grazed the periphyton community. Paraleptophlebia had ‘typical’ collector-gatherer mouthparts and had no effect on diatom densities associated with leaves whereas diatom densities on grazed tiles were higher than densities on tiles from control chambers. Epeorus had ‘brusher’ mouthparts and had little impact on diatom densities regardless of substratum type. The other two grazers had the blade-like mandibles of a scraper. Psilotreta did not reduce the numerical abundance of diatoms on either substratum, but did alter community structure by significantly reducing densities of stalked Gomphonema olivaceum and large species of Navicula and Nitzschia; densities of smaller diatoms (Achnanthes spp) increased. However, E. subvaria reduced densities of most algal species regardless of size on both substrata and also significantly altered community structure. SEMs of substrata grazed by mayflies showed reductions in fungal hyphae on all grazed leaf discs, decreases in filamentous algal forms on grazed tiles, and greatly shortened stalks of G. olivaceum (Paraleptophlebia only). Thus, periphyton communities are different on leaves versus tiles and grazers with different mouthpart morphologies have varying effects on both algal and heterotrophic microbial community structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnese, L. E. & R. L. Lowe, 1990. Comparative grazing efficiency of pulmonate and prosobranch snails. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 9: 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinn, D. W., A. Fredericksen & V. Korte, 1980. Diatom community structure on three different rock substrata in a lotic system. Brit. Phycol. J. 15: 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colletti, P. J., D. W. Blinn, A. Pickart & V. T. Wagner, 1987. Influence of different densities of the mayfly grazer Heptagenia criddlei on lotic diatom communities. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 6: 270–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W. R. & A. W. Knight, 1987. Experimental analysis of the grazing interaction between a mayfly and stream algae. Ecology 68: 1955–1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer, R. R. & E. B. Welch, 1981. Stream periphyton development in relation to current velocity and nutrients. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 38: 449–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. H., 1984. Pseudoreplication and design of ecological field studies. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The ecology of running waters. Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J. M., 1987. Alterations in periphyton characteristics due to grazing in a Cascade foothill stream. Freshwat. Biol. 18: 495–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, G. A. & V. H. Resh, 1983. Stream periphyton and insect herbivores: an experimental study of grazing by a caddisfly population. Ecology 64: 1134–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberti, G. A., L. R. Ashkenas, S. V. Gregory & A. D. Steinman, 1987. Effects of three herbivores on periphyton communities in laboratory streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 6: 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, M. A. & H. B. N. Hynes, 1976. The fate of ‘dissolved’ organic carbon derived from autumn-shed maple leaves (Acer saccharum) in a temperature hard-water stream. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 436–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, R. J., 1981. A miniture laboratory stream powered by air bubbles. Hydrobiologia 83: 383–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, P. V. & R. J. Stevenson, 1989. Effects of snail grazing on benthic algal community structure in different nutrient environments. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 8: 162–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShaffrey, D. & W. P. McCafferty, 1986. Feeding behavior of Stenacron interpunctatum (Ephemeroptera:Heptageneidae). J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 5: 200–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, B. J. & H. C. Duthie, 1989. Nutrient cycling in the epilithon of running waters. Can. J. Bot. 67: 2302–2309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, A. D., C. D. McIntire, S. V. Gregory, G. A. Lamberti & L. R. Ashkenas, 1987. Effects of herbivore type and density on taxonomic structure and physiognomy of algal assemblages in laboratory streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 6: 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J., 1983. Effects of current and conditions simulating autogenically changing microhabitats on benthic diatom immigration. Ecology 64: 1514–1524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, W. T. & C. D. McIntire, 1982. Grazer-Periphyton interactions in laboratory streams. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 93: 135–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, M. L. & D. W. Blinn, 1979. Comparison of attached algal communities on natural and artificial substrata along a thermal gradient. Brit. Phycol. J. 14: 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karouna, N.K., Fuller, R.L. Influence of four grazers on periphyton communities associated with clay tiles and leaves. Hydrobiologia 245, 53–64 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008728

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008728

Keywords

Navigation