Skip to main content
Log in

Recovery and development of parasexual fusion products inEnteromorpha linza (L.) J. Ag. (Ulvales, Chlorophyta)

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Newly released zoospores fromEnteromorpha linza (L.) J. Ag. lack significant cellulose cell wall material and are suitable for treatment as protoplasts in a parasexual fusion process using high pH-Ca+ +, PEG and centrifugation. Treated zoospores settled on glass cover slips within 3 h and were examined microscopically at 1000 ×. Presumptive fusion products were identified by their larger size and presence of twin chloroplasts and eyespots. Unfused zoospores adjacent to fusion cells were killed by 2–3 min exposure to blue light (410–490 nm) from a high pressure mercury illuminator. Unexposed fusion cells developed into uniseriate germlings within 10 days at which stage they could be readily identified at 60 × with a dissecting microscope and isolated by micropipette. Ten-day germlings from both unfused zoospores and fusion cells were stained with the DNA-localizing fluorochrome hydroethidine and relative nuclear DNA content determined with epi-(incident) UV illumination. All germlings were found to be uninucleate. Germlings from unfused zoospores had haploid nuclei with 1N = 10 and 1C and 2C levels of DNA, while germlings from fusion cells had diploid nuclei with 2N = 20 and 2C and 4C levels of DNA. These result are interpreted as evidence of karyogamy following parasexual zoospore fusions. Isolated diploid germlings, cultured for 10 weeks were found to conserve their 2N chromosome complements and elevated levels of nuclear DNA. Although most diploid germlings were morphologically similar to haploid control plants, some exhibited ‘gigas’ characteristics, including larger cells, chloroplasts, and nuclei. These results are discussed in terms of unique phenotypes that result when nuclear and organellar genes are combined in different ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamich M, Hemmingsen B (1980) Protoplast and spheroplast production. In Gantt E (ed.), Handbook of Phycological Methods. Cambridge Univ. Press, London, 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afonso CL, Harkins KR, Thomas-Compton MA, Krejci AE, Galbraith DW (1985) Selection of somatic hybrid plants inNicotiana through fluorescence-activated sorting of protoplasts. Biotechnology 3: 811–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuia MR (1982) Isolation, culture and fusion of protoplasts: problems and prospects. Silvae Genet. 31: 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj YPS (1977) Protoplast isolation, culture and somatic hybridization. In Reinert J, Bajaj YPS (eds.), Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 467–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner M (1981) Protoplasts of eukaryotic algae. Int. Rev. Cytol., Suppl. 16: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliding C (1963) A critical survey of European taxa in Ulvales. Part 1.Capsosiphon, Percursaria, Blidingia, Enteromorpha. Opera Bot. 8: 1–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LCM (1986) Cell development ofPorphyra miniata (Rhodophyceae) under axenic culture. Bot. Mar. 29: 435–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney D (1984) Genetic modification in seaweeds: applications to commercial utilization and cultivation. In Colwell R, Pariser E, Sinskey A (eds), Biotechnology in the Marine Sciences. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney DF (1986) Genetic engineering in seaweeds: applications and current status. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 81: 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney DP, Mar E, Saga N, van der Meer J (1986) Protoplast isolation and cell division in the agar-producing seaweedGracilaria (Rhodophyta) J. Phycol. 22: 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocking EC (1960) A method for the isolation of plant protoplasts and vacuoles. Nature 187: 962–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangeard P (1959) L'Enteromorpha linza. Botaniste 43: 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA, Flick CE, Jensen RA (1981) Disease resistance: incorporation into sexually incompatible somatic hybrids of the genusNicotiana. Science 213: 907–909.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DA, Bravo J, Gleba Y (1983) Somatic hybridization: fusion methods, recovery of hybrids and genetic analysis. Int. Rev. Cytol., Suppl. 16: 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freshwater DW, Kapraun DF (1986) Field, culture and cytological studies ofPorphyra carolinensis Coll et Cox (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from North Carolina. Jap. J. Phycol. 34: 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita Y, Migita S (1987) Fusion of protoplasts from thalli of two different color types inPorphyra yezoensis Ueda and development of fusion products. Jap. J. Phycol. 35: 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith DW, Mauch TJ (1980) Identification of fusion of plant protoplasts. II. Conditions for the reproducible fluorescence labelling of protoplasts derived from mesophyll tissue. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 98: 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff LJ, Coleman AW (1984) Elucidation of fertilization and development in a red alga by quantitative DNA microspectrofluorometry. Devel. Biol. 102: 173–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harkins KR, Galbraith DW (1984) Flow sorting and culture of plant protoplasts. Physiol. Plant. 60: 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms C (1983) Somatic hybridization by plant protoplast fusion. Quart. Rev. Biol. 58: 325–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, KN, Michayluk MR (1974) A method of high-frequency intergeneric fusion of plant prototypes. Planta 155: 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Constable MR, Gamborg OL (1974) Plant protoplast fusion and growth of intergeneric hybrid cells. Planta 120: 215–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kapraun DF (1970) Field and culture studies ofUlva andEnteromorpha in the vicinity of Port Aransas, Texas. Contrib. Mar. Sci. 15: 205–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapraun DF (1974) Seasonal periodicity and spatial distribution of benthic marine algae in Louisiana. Contrib. Mar. Sci. 18: 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapraun DF, Flynn E (1973) Taxonomic and culture studies ofEnteromorpha linza (L.) J. Ag. AndUlvaria oxysperma (Kuetz.) Bliding (Chlorophyceae, Ulvales) from Central America. Phycologia 12: 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapraun DF, Freshwater DW (1987) Karyological studies of five species in the genusPorphyra (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from the North Atlantic and Mediterranean. Phycologia 26: 82–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapraun DF, Martin DJ (1987) Karyological studies of three species ofCodium (Codiales, Chlorophyta) from coastal North Carolina. Phycologia 26: 228–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapraun DF, Sherman SG (1989) Strain selection and cell isolation ofUlvaria oxysperma (Kuetz.) Bliding for net cultivation. Hydrobiologia. 179: 53–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kapraun DF, Gargiulo GM, Tripodi G (1988) Nuclear DNA and karyotype variation in species ofCodium (Codiales, Chlorophyta) from the North Atlantic. Phycologia 27: 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartha KK, Michayluk MR, Kao KN, Gamborg AL, Constabel F (1974) Callus formation and plant regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts of rape plants (Brassica napus L. cv. Zephyr) Plant Sci. Letters 3: 265–271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matagne R, Deltour D, Ledoux L (1979) Somatic fusion between cell wall mutants ofChlamydomonas reinhardtii. Nature (London) 278: 344–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millner PA, Callow ME, Evans LV (1979) Preparation of protoplasts from the green algaEnteromorpha intestinalis (L.) Link. Planta (Berlin) 147: 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polne-Fuller M, Gibor A (1987) Tissue culture of seaweeds. In Bird K, Benson PH (eds), Seaweed Cultivation for Renewable Resources. Gas Research Institute, Chicago, IL, 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power JB, Cummins SE, Cocking EC (1970) Fusion of isolated plant protoplasts. Nature 225: 1016–1018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Power JB, Frearson EM, Hayward C, George D, Evans PK, Berry SF, Cocking EC (1976) Somatic hybridization ofPetunia hybrida andPetunia parodii. Nature 263: 500–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primke M, Berger S, Schweiger H (1978) Protoplasts fromAcetabularia: isolation and fusion. Cytobiologie 16: 375–380.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DG & Schlösser UG (1978) Cell wall regeneration by protoplasts ofChlamydomonas. Planta 141: 83–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saga N, Polne-Fuller M, Gibor A (1986) Protoplasts from seaweeds: production and fusion. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 83: 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieder O, Vasil IK (1980) Protoplast fusion and somatic hybridization. Int. Rev. Cytol. Suppl. 11B: 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlösser UG, Sachs H, Robinson DG (1976) Isolation of protoplasts by means of a ‘species-specific’ autolysine inChlamydomonas. Protoplasma 88: 51–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam NC, Kasha KJ (1973) Selective chromosomal elimination during haploid formation in barley following interspecific hybridization. Chromosoma (Berl.) 42: 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrey JG (1985) The development of plant biotechnology. Am. Scientist 73: 354–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin A, Glimelius K, Eriksson T (1974) The induction of aggregation and fusion ofDaucus carota protoplasts by polyethylene glycol. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 74: 64–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (1983) Some experiments and observations on the tissue and cell culture ofUndaria pinnatifida. J. Shandong Coll. Oceanology 12: 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kapraun, D.F. Recovery and development of parasexual fusion products inEnteromorpha linza (L.) J. Ag. (Ulvales, Chlorophyta). J Appl Phycol 1, 239–246 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003649

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003649

Key words

Navigation