Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plagiarism and the Internet: Fears, Facts, and Pedagogies

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Academic Integrity

Abstract

Despite widespread fears about the Internet as a cause of or contributor to plagiarism, no empirical research demonstrates that relationship. These fears that the Internet has facilitated and accelerated the number of cases of student plagiarism are incorrect. Scholarship on the topic indicates the complexity of writing in the online environment. The fact is that writing with sources, especially sources found on the Internet, is difficult, sophisticated work. This chapter demonstrates the limitations of and alternatives to automated plagiarism-detecting software as a response to online plagiarism. Rather, pedagogies that mentor students’ critical reading practices are an important part of preventing online plagiarism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkins, T., & Nelson, G. (2001). Plagiarism and the Internet: Turning the tables. English Journal, 90, 101–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2010). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. (2008). Insider writing: Plagiarism-proof assignments. In C. Eisner & M. Vicinus (Eds.), Originality, imitation, and plagiarism: Teaching writing in the digital age (pp. 208–218). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, D. (2007). “Who’s the President?” Ghostwriting and shifting values in literacy. College English, 69, 549–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., Fallon, B., Lott, J., Matthews, E., & Mintie, E. (2007). Taking on Turnitin: Tutors advocating change. Writing Center Journal, 27, 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (2013). A handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education (2nd ed.). Headington: Oxford Brookes University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, V., Hensley, R., & O’Neill, E. (1994). Beyond information retrieval: Transforming research assignments into genuine inquiry. Journal of Teaching Writing, 13, 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dant, D. (1986). Plagiarism in high school: A survey. English Journal, 75, 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Carroll, J. (2009). Formative feedback within plagiarism education: Is there a role for text-matching software? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 5. http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/614

  • Dyke, J. F. (2004). Knowledge transfer across disciplines: Tracking rhetorical strategies from a technical communications classroom to an engineering classroom. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47(4), 301–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2012). Streamlining plagiarism detection: The role of electronic assessment management. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 8. http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/809/603.

  • Emerson, L. (2008). Plagiarism, a Turnitin trial, and an experience of cultural disorientation. In C. Eisner & M. Vicinus (Eds.), Originality, imitation, and plagiarism: Teaching writing in the digital age (pp. 183–194). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercegovac, Z., & Richardson, J. (2004). Academic dishonesty, plagiarism included, in the digital age: A literature review. College and Research Libraries, 65, 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eret, E., & Ok, A. (2014). Internet plagiarism in higher education: Tendencies, triggering factors, and reasons. Assessment and Evaluation In Higher Education, 39, 1002–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabos, B. (2008). The Price of Information: Critical Literacy Information and Today's Internet. In D. J. Leu, J. Coiro, M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies. (pp. 1109–1159). Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, L. (2013, December 11). Reading to write in East Asian studies. Across the Disciplines, 10. http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/reading/freedman.cfm

  • Gavin, C. (1994). Guiding students along the information highway: Librarians collaborating with composition instructors. Journal of Teaching Writing, 13, 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, K., Lang, S., Norris, M., Palmer, L. (2009, November). Electronic plagiarism checkers: Barriers to developing an academic voice. The WAC Journal, 20. http://wac.colostate.edu/journal/vol20/gillis.pdf

  • Glatt, B., & Haertel, E. (1982). The use of the cloze testing procedure for detecting plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Education, 50, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, D. (1991). The Bedford handbook for writers (3rd ed.). Boston: Bedford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haviland, C. P., & Mullin, J. (2008). Connecting plagiarism, intellectual property, and disciplinary habits. In Who owns this text? Plagiarism, authorship, and disciplinary cultures (pp. 1–19). Utah: Utah State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, N., & Introna, L. (2005). Systems for the production of plagiarists? The implications arising from the use of plagiarism detection systems in UK universities for Asian learners. Journal of Academic Ethics, 3, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, T. (2010). Intellectual property on campus: Students’ rights and responsibilities. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horning, A. (2011, October). Where to put the manicules: A theory of expert reading. Across the Disciplines, 8. http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/articles/horning2011/index.cfm

  • Howard, R. (2000). The ethics of plagiarism. In M. A. Pemberton (Ed.), The ethics of writing instruction: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 79–89). Stamford: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. (2007). Understanding ‘Internet plagiarism’. Computers and Composition, 24, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English, 57, 708–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. (1993). A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, 11, 233–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R., & Davies, L. (2009). Plagiarism in the Internet age. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introna, L., & Hayes, N. (2011). On sociomaterial imbrications: What plagiarism detection systems reveal and why it matters. Information and Organization, 21, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, D. (1993). The ethics of plagiarism: How genre affects writers’ use of source materials. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 56, 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, S. (2013, December 11). What students’ use of sources reveals about advanced writing skills. Across the Disciplines, 10. http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/reading/jamieson.cfm

  • JISC and the British Library. (2012, June 28). Researchers of tomorrow: The research behaviour of generation Y doctoral students. http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140614205429/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/reports/2012/Researchers-of-Tomorrow.pdf

  • Krulwich, R. (2012, February 24). Is the ‘right to be forgotten’ the ‘biggest threat to free speech on the Internet’? NPR. http://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2012/02/23/147289169/is-the-right-to-be-forgotten-the-biggest-threat-to-free-speech-on-the-Internet

  • Laird, E. (2001). Internet plagiarism: We all pay the price. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J. (2013). Cheating lessons: Learning from academic dishonesty. Cambridge: Harvard.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop, A., & Foss, K. (2000). Student cheating and plagiarism in the Internet era: A wake-up call. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop, A., & Foss, K. (2005). Guiding students from cheating and plagiarism to honesty and integrity: Strategies for change. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. (1929). Summary of investigations relating to grammar, language, and composition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, B. (2007). Plagiarism: Alchemy and remedy in higher education. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., & Stephens, J. (2006, November 30). ‘Epidemic’ as opportunity: Internet plagiarism as a lever for cultural change. Teachers College Record.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, G., & Rogerson, A. (2009). Links are not enough: Using originality reports to improve academic standards, compliance and learning outcomes among postgraduate students. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 5. http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/613/470

  • McClure, R., & Clink, K. (2009). How do you know that? An investigation of student research practices in the digital age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeough, A., Lupart, J., & Marini, A. (Eds.). (1995). Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (2010). Review of Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6. http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/707/533.

  • Norgaard, R. (2003). Writing information literacy: Contributions to a concept. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 43, 124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odom, M. (2013, December 11). Not just for writing anymore: What WAC can teach us about reading to learn. Across the Disciplines, 10. http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/reading/odom.cfm

  • Pecorari, D. (2013). Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., Friedrich, L., Jacklin, A., . . . Zickuhr, K. (2012, November 1). How teens do research in the digital world. Pew Research Internet Project. http://www.pewInternet.org/2012/11/01/how-teens-do-research-in-the-digital-world/

  • Purdy, J. (2005). Calling off the hounds: Technology and the visibility of plagiarism. Pedagogy, 5, 275–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, M., & Emerson, L. (2009). The impact that Turnitin has had on text-based assessment practice. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 5. http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/479

  • Rhodes, L. (2013, December 11). When is writing also reading? Across the Disciplines 10. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/reading/rhodes.cfm. Accessed 30 Oct 2014.

  • Roig, M. (1999). When college students’ attempts at paraphrasing become instances of plagiarism. Psychological Reports, 84, 973–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, P., & Neumann, D. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 374–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schab, F. (1980). Cheating among college and non-college bound pupils, 1969–1979. The Clearing House, 53, 379–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt S. (2004, March 31). Term papers axed to obliterate plagiarism. Calgary Herald. http://www.canada.com/calgary/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=849ee48c-7aae-4551-9cc9-7ad274743c4c

  • Scholes, R. (2002). The transition to college reading. Pedagogy, 2, 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selinger, E. (2014, May 22). Google vs. our humanity: How the emerging ‘Internet of things’ is turning us into robots. Salon. http://www.salon.com/2014/05/22/google_vs_our_humanity_how_the_emerging_Internet_of_things_is_turning_us_into_robots/?utm_source=twitter

  • Silva, M. L. (2013). Can I Google that? A case study of the online navigational literacy and information literacy strategies of undergraduate students in a research writing course. In R. McClure & J. Purdy (Eds.), The New Digital Scholar: Exploring and Enriching the Research and Writing Practices of NextGen Students. New Jersey: Information Today, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, S. (1999). Competing notions of authorship: A historical look at students and textbooks on plagiarism and cheating. In L. Buranen & A. Roy (Eds.), Perspectives on plagiarism and intellectual property in a postmodern world (pp. 41–54). Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisti, D. (2007). How do high school students justify internet plagiarism? Ethics and Behavior, 17, 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaar, H., & Hammer, H. (2013). Why students plagiarise from the Internet: The views and practices in three Norwegian upper secondary classrooms. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 9, 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sourceforge (2014). Patchcatcher: Software for patchwriting detection. Slashdot Media. http://sourceforge.net/projects/patchcatcher/?source=directory

  • Sohrabi, B., Ghollpour, A., & Mohammadesmaelli, N. (2011). Effects of personality and information technology on plagiarism: An Iranian perspective. Ethics and Behavior, 21, 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, L., & Gorassini, D. (1986). An evaluation of the cloze procedure as a test for plagiarism. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 130–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Weaving the literacy web: Changes in reading from page to screen. The Reading Teacher, 55, 662–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the Internet and student learning: Improving academic integrity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2010). Retribution, deterrence, and reform: The dilemmas of plagiarism management in universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, T. (2004). A radical step: Implementing a critical information literacy model. Libraries and the Academy, 4(2), 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2009). Plagiarism or intertextuality? A study of the politics of knowledge, identity and textual ownership in undergraduate student writing. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley, C., & Parsell, M. (2004). Technology and academic virtue: Student plagiarism through the looking glass. Ethics and Information Technology, 6, 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukpebor, C., & Ogbebor, A. (2013). Internet and plagiarism: Awareness, attitude, and perception of students in secondary schools. International Research: Journal of Library and Information Science, 3, 254–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber-Wulff, D. (2014). False feathers: A perspective on academic plagiarism. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wurman, R. (2001). Information anxiety 2. Indianapolis: Que.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey, K. (2004). Episodes in the space of the plural commons: Curriculum, administration, and the design of composition in the twenty-first century. Newark: Plenary address, Council of Writing Program Administrators.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. English Department, State University of New York College at Cortland, Cortland, NY, USA

    Laura J. Panning Davies

  2. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA

    Rebecca Moore Howard

Authors
  1. Laura J. Panning Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecca Moore Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura J. Panning Davies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Australia, School of Management, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Tracey Bretag

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Davies, L.J.P., Howard, R.M. (2016). Plagiarism and the Internet: Fears, Facts, and Pedagogies. In: Bretag, T. (eds) Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation