Skip to main content

Different Methods of Arterial Compliance Estimation Tested with Reservoir-Wave Model of Arterial System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 68/1))

Abstract

Arterial compliance (C) describes the ability of the arterial system to increase volume (V) with increasing pressure (P). Compliance is a marker of preclinical vascular diseases and cardiovascular risk factor. There are many different methods estimating arterial compliance. The aim of this study was to find out whether three of them: diastolic decay time method, pulse pressure method and area method are able to recover assumed value of C, when applied to reservoir-wave model of arterial system. This model assumes that arterial pressure is sum of two components: pressure caused by blood flow and pressure resulting from change in arterial blood volume. We calculate aortic blood pressure using reservoir-wave model for given blood flow and different values of model parameters Z—arterial impedance (0.1 < Z < 0.4) C—compliance (0.6 < C < 2.0), R—total peripheral resistance (0.5 < R < 3.0) Next, we use above mentioned three methods of compliance estimation and compared recovered value of C with value of C used in reservoir—wave model. We found, that area method showed best agreement between assumed and calculated arterial compliance C. Also diastolic decay time method can be used but estimated R may be misleading. Pulse pressure method produced erroneous estimates of assumed C values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dart, Anthony M., and Bronwyn A. Kingwell. “Pulse pressure—a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 37.4 (2001): 975–984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Giezen AM, Schopman-Geurts van Kessel JG, Schouten EG, Slotboom BJ, Kok FJ, Collette HJ. Systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular mortality among 13,740 Dutch women. Prev Med (1990); 19:456–465.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Domanski MJ, Mitchell GF, Norman JE, Exner DV, Pitt B, Pfeffer MA. Independent prognostic information provided by sphygmomanometrically determined pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol (1999); 33:951–958.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tyberg, John V., et al. “The case for the reservoir-wave approach.” International journal of cardiology 172.2 (2014): 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frank O. Die grundform des arteriellen pulses. Z Biol 1899; 37:483–526.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J. J., O’Brien A. B., Shrive N. G., Parker K. H., Tyberg J. V. Time-domain representation of ventricular-arterial. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003; 284: H1358–H1368.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stergiopulos, N., J-J. Meister, and N. Westerhof. “Simple and accurate way for estimating total and segmental arterial compliance: the pulse pressure method.” Annals of biomedical engineering 22.4 (1994): 392–397.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Zhaorong, Kenneth P. Brin, and F. C. Yin. “Estimation of total arterial compliance: an improved method and evaluation of current methods.” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 251.3 (1986): H588–H600.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Segers, Patrick, et al. “Pulse pressure method and the area method for the estimation of total arterial compliance in dogs: sensitivity to wave reflection intensity.” Annals of biomedical engineering 27.4 (1999): 480–485.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Żyliński .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Żyliński, M., Niewiadomski, W., Sadowiec, M., Cybulski, G. (2019). Different Methods of Arterial Compliance Estimation Tested with Reservoir-Wave Model of Arterial System. In: Lhotska, L., Sukupova, L., Lacković, I., Ibbott, G.S. (eds) World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 68/1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_131

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_131

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-9034-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-9035-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics