Skip to main content

Inconsistency-tolerant Description Logic: Motivation and Basic Systems

  • Chapter
Trends in Logic

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 21))

Abstract

In this paper, three systems of constructive and inconsistency-tolerant description logic are motivated and defined semantically. Moreover, sound and complete tableau calculi for these systems are presented.

S.P. Odintsou acknowledges support by the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Akama, On Constructive Modality, in: S. Akama (ed.), Logic, Language and Computation, Kluwer Academic Publishrs, Dordrecht, 1997, 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Almukdad and D. Nelson, Constructible Falsity and Inexact Predicates Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (1984), 231–233.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Baader and U. Sattler, An Overview of Tableau Algorithms for Description Logics Studia Logica 69 (2001), 5 40.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Baader et al. (eds.), The Description Logic Handbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Belnap, A Useful Four-Valued Logic, in: J.M. Dunn and G. Epstein (eds.) Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued LogicReidel, Dordrecht, 8–37, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Blackburn, M. de Rijke and Y. Venema, Modal Logic, Cambridge Tracts in Teoretical Computer Science 53, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Bull, MIPC as the Formalisation of an Intuitionistic Concept of Modality Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1966), 609–616.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. van Dalen, Intuitionistic Logic, in: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol.111: Alternatives to Classical Logic, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986, 225–339.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Donini, M. Lenzerini, D. Nardi, and A. Schaerf, Reasoning in Description Logics, in: G. Brewka (ed.), Principles of Knowledge Representation, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996, 191–236.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Bozié’s and K. Dosen, Models for Normal Intuitionistic Modal Logics Studio Logica 43 (1984), 217–245.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.M. Dunn, Partiality and its Dual Studio Logica66 (2000), 5–40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Fischer Servi, On Modal Logic with an Intuitionistic Base, Studio Logica, 36 (1977), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Fischer Servi, Axiomatizations for some Intuitionistic Modal Logics Rend. Sem. Mat. Univers. Polit.42 (1984), 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Gabbay, A. Kurucz, F. Wolter, and M. Zakharyaschev Many-Dimensional Modal Logics: Theory and Applicationsbook manuscript, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Grefe, Fischer Servi’s Intuitionistic Modal Logic has the Finite Model Property, in: M. Kracht et al. (eds.), Advances in Modal logic. Vol. 1., CSLI Lecture Notes 87, 1998, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu. Gurevich, Intuitionistic Logic with Strong Negation, Studia Logica 27 (1977), 49–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Lutz and U. Sattler, The Complexity of Reasoning with Boolean Modal Logic, in: F. Wolter et al. (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic. Volume 3, World Scientific Publishers, Singapore, 2002, 329–348.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. S.P. Odintsov, Algebraic Semantics for Paraconsitent Nelson’s Logic, 2002, to appear in: Journal of Logic and Computation.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.P. Odintsov, On the Embedding of Nelson’s Logics, Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 31 /4 (2002), 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Ono, On some Intuitionistic Modal Logics, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. Kyoto Univ. 13 (1977), 687–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Ono and N.-Y. Suzuki, Relations between Intuitionistic Modal Logics and Intermediate Predicate Logics, Reports on Mathematical Logic 22 (1989), 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P.F. Patel-Schneider, A Four-valued Semantics for Terminological Logics, Artificial Intelligence 38, No. 3 (1989), 319–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A.K. Simpson, The Proof Theory and Semantics of Intuitionistic Modal Logic, PhD Thesis, University of Edinburg, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. Sotirov, Modal Theories With Intuitionistic Logic, in: Mathematical Logic. Proceedings of the Conference on Mathematical Logic, Dedicated to the Memory of A.A. Markov (1903–1979), Sofia, September 22–23, 1980, Sofia, 1984, 139–171.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Thomason, A Semantical Study of Constructive Falsity, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik and Grundlagen der Mathematik, 15 (1969), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Waaler and L. Wallen, Tableaux for Intuitionistic Logic, in: M. D’Agostino et al. (eds.), Handbook of Tableaux Methods, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999, 255–296.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. H. Wansing, The Logic of Information Structures, Lecture Notes in Al 681, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Wansing, Tarskian Structured Consequence Relations and Functional Completeness, Math. Logic Quarterly 41 (1995), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Wansing, Negation, in: L. Goble (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic, Basil Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge/Ma., 2001, 415–436.

    Google Scholar 

  30. F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev, Intuitionistic Modal Logic, in: A. Cantini et al. (eds.), Logic and Foundations of Mathematics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999, 227–238.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev, Intuitionistic Modal Logics as Fragments of Classical Bimodal Logics, in: E. Orlowska (ed.), Logic at Work, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1999, 168–186.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Odintsov, S.P., Wansing, H. (2003). Inconsistency-tolerant Description Logic: Motivation and Basic Systems. In: Hendricks, V.F., Malinowski, J. (eds) Trends in Logic. Trends in Logic, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3598-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3598-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6414-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3598-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics