Skip to main content
Log in

Intuitionistic logic with strong negation

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. M. C. Fitting,Intuitionistic logic, model theory and forcing, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Grzegorczyk,A philosophically plausible formal interpretation of intuitionistic logic,Indagationes Mathematicae 26 (1964), pp. 596–601.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. C. Kleene,Introduction to metamathematics, Van Nostrand, New York, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Kripke,Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic I, inFormal systems and recursive functions, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 94–130.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. A. Markov,Konstruktivnaja logika (in Russian),Uspekhi Matematičeskih Nauk 5.3 (1950), pp. 187–188.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. C. C. McKinsey,Proof of independence of the primitive symbols of Heyting's calculus of propositions,Journal of Symbolic Logic 4 (1939), pp. 155–158.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Nelson,Constructible falsity,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 14 (1949), pp. 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Rasiowa,N-lattices and constructive logic with strong negation,Fundamenta Mathematicae 46 (1958), pp. 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. H. Thomason,A semantical study of constructible falsity,Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 15 (1969), pp. 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. N. Vorob'ev,Constructive propositional calculus with strong negation (in Russian),Transactions of Steklov's Institute 72 (1964), 195–227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gurevich, Y. Intuitionistic logic with strong negation. Stud Logica 36, 49–59 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02121114

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02121114

Keywords

Navigation