Skip to main content

The Possibility of Philosophy of Action

  • Chapter
Human Action, Deliberation and Causation

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 77))

Abstract

Fred moves his finger, thereby flicking the switch, turning on the light, illuminating the room and alerting the prowler (Davidson 1963). What explains the action or actions he performs?

I would like to thank Anita Avaramides, John Bigelow, Bill Brewer, John Campbell, Bill Child, Henry Fitzgerald, Elizabeth Fricker, Steve Gardner, Frank Jackson, Dale Jamieson, Jakob Hohwy, Richard Holton, Jeannette

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dancy, Jonathan (1994), “Why there is really No Such Thing as the Theory of Motivation”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald (1963), “Actions, Reasons and Causes”, reprinted in Donald Davidson Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H.P. (1961), “The Causal Theory of Perception”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 121–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind (1991), “Arational Actions”, Journal of Philosophy. 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Mark (1989), “Dispositional Theories of Value”, Proceed-ings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 139–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, Jeanette and Michael Smith (1994), “Philosophy and Commonsense: The Case of Weakness of Will”, in Michaelis Michael and John O’Leary Hawthorne, eds, Philosophy in Mind. Dordrecht. Kluwer Press. 141–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, Jeannette and Michael Smith (1996), “Frog and Toad Lose Control”, Analysis. 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David (1989), “Dispositional Theories of Value”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 113–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, John (1978), “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, Alfred (1987), Irrationality: An Essay on Akrasia, Self-Deception and Self-Control. New York. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Philip (1987), “Humeans, Anti-Humeans and Motivation”, Mind. 530–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Philip and Michael Smith (1993), “Brandt on Self-Control”, in Brad Hooker, ed., Rationality Rules and Utility. Boulder. West-view Press. 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, Mark (1979), Ways of Meaning. London. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael (1987), “The Humean Theory of Motivation”, Mind. 36–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael (1988), “On Humeans, Anti-Humeans and Motivation: A Reply to Pettit”, Mind. 589–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael (1989), “Dispositional Theories of Value”, Proceed-ings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael (1992), “Valuing: Desiring or Believing?”, in David Charles and Kathleen Lennon, eds, Reduction, Explanation, Realism. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 323–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael (1994a), The Moral Problem. Oxford. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael (1994b), “Minimalism, Truth-Aptitude and Belief’, Analysis. 21–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael (1995), “Internal Reasons”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 109–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Michael (forthcoming), “Amoralism, Moralism and the Argument for Internalism”, Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, Michael (1981), “Values and Purposes: The Limits of Teleology and the Ends of Friendship”, Journal of Philosophy. 747–765.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, M. (1998). The Possibility of Philosophy of Action. In: Bransen, J., Cuypers, S.E. (eds) Human Action, Deliberation and Causation. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 77. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5082-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5082-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6134-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5082-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics