Skip to main content

An Approach to General Proof Theory and a Conjecture of a Kind of Completeness of Intuitionistic Logic Revisited

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Natural Deduction

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 39))

Abstract

Thirty years ago I formulated a conjecture about a kind of completeness of intuitionistic logic. The framework in which the conjecture was formulated had the form of a semantic approach to a general proof theory (presented at the 4th World Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science at Bucharest 1971 [6]). In the present chapter, I shall reconsider this 30-year old conjecture, which still remains unsettled, but which I continue to think of as a plausible and important supposition. Reconsidering the conjecture, I shall also reconsider and revise the semantic approach in which the conjecture was formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Prawitz [4]. The elimination rules are there said to be the inverse of the corresponding introduction rules.

  2. 2.

    One may argue that to allow the value to contain new inferences is too liberal, since the justifying operation then produces an argument that goes beyond what was present in the arguments for the premisses. However, this is an angle that is not taken up here.

References

  1. Dummett, M. (1991). The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Howard, W. (1980). The formulae-as-types notion of construction. In J. R. Hindley & J. Seldin (Eds.), To H. B. Curry: Essays on combinatory logic, lambda calculus, and formalism (pp. 479–490). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin-Löf, P. (1971). Hauptsatz for the intuitionistic theory of iterated inductive definitions. In J. E. Fenstad (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium (pp. 179–216). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prawitz, D. (1965). Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wicksell. (Reprinted 2006. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prawitz, D. (1970). Constructive semantics. In Proceedings of the First Scandinavian Logic Symposium, Åbo 1968, Filosofiska studier 8 (pp. 96–114) Uppsala: Filosofiska Föreningen och Filosofiska institutionen vid Uppsala Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prawitz, D. (1971). Ideas and results in proof theory. In J. E. Fenstad (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium (pp. 225–250). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prawitz, D. (1973). Towards a foundation of a general proof theory. In P. Suppes, et al. (Eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV (pp. 225–250). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Prawitz, D. (2005). Logical consequence from a constructivist point of view. In S. Shapiro (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic (pp. 671-695). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prawitz, D. (2006). Meaning approached via proofs. Synthese, 148, 507–524.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schroeder-Heister, P. (2006). Validity concepts in proof-theoretic semantics. Synthese, 148, 525–571.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tait, W. (1967). Intentional interpretation of functionals of finite type I. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 32, 198–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Work on this chapter was done within the project Interpretation and Meaning, funded by Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dag Prawitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prawitz, D. (2014). An Approach to General Proof Theory and a Conjecture of a Kind of Completeness of Intuitionistic Logic Revisited. In: Pereira, L., Haeusler, E., de Paiva, V. (eds) Advances in Natural Deduction. Trends in Logic, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7548-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics