Abstract
Although the term science education implies that both science and education are integral to our field, most science teacher educators only have a background in classroom science teaching. Most of their experiences are thus grounded in the classroom and school context and rarely in the science laboratory. This chapter was motivated by my experiences seeking a university appointment after completing my doctorate in science education. It seemed to be presumed and was sometimes required that an applicant possessed science classroom experience, which I lacked. I became troubled that my experience in a science laboratory might not meet the requirements of the position as framed by the social and cultural contexts of elementary and secondary schooling. This self-study considers whether and to what extent my doctoral program prepared me to be a science teacher educator: Was I doomed because I lacked classroom experience, or did my doctoral program help bridge the gap between my laboratory past and my science teacher educator future? Through autobiographical accounts of my doctoral program, I reached the broad conclusion that through the individualized nature of my doctoral training, I was prepared to become both a researcher and an educator.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abell, S. K., Park Rogers, M. A., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. (2009). Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: A model of developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 77–93.
Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A., & Evans, C. (2007). Inquiry in the classroom: Necessary components of a useful definition. In E. Abrams, S. A. Southerland, & P. Silva (Eds.), Inquiry in the science classroom: Realities and opportunities. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (2nd ed., pp. 493–535). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berry, A. (2008). Tensions in teaching about teaching: Understanding practice as a teacher educator. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. B., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577–616.
Brown, M. L., Davis, G., Fagen, A. P., Niebur, S. M., & Wells, K. S. (2001). The 2000 National Doctoral Program Survey. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from http://survey.nagps.org
Bullock, S. M. (2007). Finding my way from teacher to teacher educator: Valuing innovative pedagogy and inquiry into practice. In T. Russell & J. Loughran (Eds.), Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education: Values, relationships and practices (pp. 77–94). London: Routledge.
Bullock, S. M. (2009). Learning to think like a teacher educator: Making the substantive and syntactic structures of teaching explicit through self-study. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 291–304.
Bullough, R. V., Jr., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.
Chin, P. (1997). Teaching and learning in teacher education: Who is carrying the ball? In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Teaching about teaching: Purpose, passion, and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 117–130). London: Falmer Press.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 5–18.
Dinkelman, T. (2003). Self-study in teacher education: A means and ends tool for promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 6–18.
Dinkelman, T., Margolis, J., & Sikkenga, K. (2006). From teacher to teacher educator: Experiences, expectations, expatriation. Studying Teacher Education, 2(1), 5–23.
Fagen, A. P., & Niebur, S. M. (2000, December). Preliminary results for the national doctoral program survey: 32,000 student experiences. Paper presented at meeting of the Council of Graduate Schools, New Orleans, LA.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731–767.
Goodlad, J. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hamilton, M. L. (2004). Professional knowledge, teacher education and self-study. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 375–419). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Jablon, P. C. (2002). The status of science education doctoral programs in the United States: The need for core knowledge and skills. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(1). Retrieved May 13, 2010, from http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/ejse.html
Kennedy, M. (1998). Education reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 249–263.
Korthagen, G., Loughran, J., & Lunenberg, M. (2005). Teaching teachers–studies into the expertise of teacher educators: An introduction to this theme issue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 107–115.
Labaree, D. F. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lederman, N. G., Kuerbis, P., Loving, C., Ramey-Gassert, L., Roychoudhury, A., & Spector, B. S. (1997). Professional knowledge standards for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 233–240.
Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of Âpedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343–1363.
Lee, O., Luykx, A., Buxton, C. A., & Shaver, A. (2007). The challenge of altering elementary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding linguistic and cultural diversity in science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1269–1291.
Loughran, J. J. (2007). Science teacher as learner. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (2nd ed., pp. 1043–1065). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mueller, A. (2003). Looking back and looking forward: Always becoming a teacher educator through self-study. Reflective Practice, 4(1), 67–84.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nyquist, J. D., & Woodford, B. J. (2000). Re-envisioning the Ph.D. What concerns do we have? Seattle, WA: University of Washington Center for Instructional Development and Research.
Pinnegar, S. (1998). Introduction to methodology. In M. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teacher education (pp. 31–33). London: Falmer.
Ritter, J. K. (2007). Forging a pedagogy of teacher education: The challenges of moving from classroom teacher to teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, 3, 5–22.
Ritter, J. K. (2009). Developing a vision of teacher education: How my classroom teacher understandings evolved in the university environment. Studying Teacher Education, 5, 45–60.
Romberg, T. A., Carpenter, T., & Dremock, F. (Eds.). (2005). Understanding mathematics and science matters. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Russell, T. (1997). Teaching teachers: How I teach IS the message. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Teaching about teaching: Purpose, passion, and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 32–47). London: Falmer Press.
Russell, T. (2007). Tracing the development of self-study in teacher education research and practice. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 1191–1210). London: Routledge.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Tidwell, D., & Fitzgerald, L. (2004). Self study as teaching. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 69–102). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Wilson, M. S. (2006). Finding a canon and core: Meditations on the preparation of teacher educator-researchers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 315–325.
Zeichner, K. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: A personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 117–124.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Santau, A.O. (2012). Bridging the Gap Between a Science Laboratory Past and a Science Teacher Educator Present: Rethinking the Doctoral Program in Science Education. In: Bullock, S., Russell, T. (eds) Self-Studies of Science Teacher Education Practices. Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3904-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3904-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3903-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3904-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)