Skip to main content

Bridging the Gap Between a Science Laboratory Past and a Science Teacher Educator Present: Rethinking the Doctoral Program in Science Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Self-Studies of Science Teacher Education Practices

Part of the book series: Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices ((STEP,volume 12))

Abstract

Although the term science education implies that both science and education are integral to our field, most science teacher educators only have a background in classroom science teaching. Most of their experiences are thus grounded in the classroom and school context and rarely in the science laboratory. This chapter was motivated by my experiences seeking a university appointment after completing my doctorate in science education. It seemed to be presumed and was sometimes required that an applicant possessed science classroom experience, which I lacked. I became troubled that my experience in a science laboratory might not meet the requirements of the position as framed by the social and cultural contexts of elementary and secondary schooling. This self-study considers whether and to what extent my doctoral program prepared me to be a science teacher educator: Was I doomed because I lacked classroom experience, or did my doctoral program help bridge the gap between my laboratory past and my science teacher educator future? Through autobiographical accounts of my doctoral program, I reached the broad conclusion that through the individualized nature of my doctoral training, I was prepared to become both a researcher and an educator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abell, S. K., Park Rogers, M. A., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. (2009). Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: A model of developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A., & Evans, C. (2007). Inquiry in the classroom: Necessary components of a useful definition. In E. Abrams, S. A. Southerland, & P. Silva (Eds.), Inquiry in the science classroom: Realities and opportunities. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (2nd ed., pp. 493–535). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. (2008). Tensions in teaching about teaching: Understanding practice as a teacher educator. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. B., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. L., Davis, G., Fagen, A. P., Niebur, S. M., & Wells, K. S. (2001). The 2000 National Doctoral Program Survey. Retrieved August 8, 2010, from http://survey.nagps.org

  • Bullock, S. M. (2007). Finding my way from teacher to teacher educator: Valuing innovative pedagogy and inquiry into practice. In T. Russell & J. Loughran (Eds.), Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education: Values, relationships and practices (pp. 77–94). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, S. M. (2009). Learning to think like a teacher educator: Making the substantive and syntactic structures of teaching explicit through self-study. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R. V., Jr., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, P. (1997). Teaching and learning in teacher education: Who is carrying the ball? In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Teaching about teaching: Purpose, passion, and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 117–130). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelman, T. (2003). Self-study in teacher education: A means and ends tool for promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelman, T., Margolis, J., & Sikkenga, K. (2006). From teacher to teacher educator: Experiences, expectations, expatriation. Studying Teacher Education, 2(1), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagen, A. P., & Niebur, S. M. (2000, December). Preliminary results for the national doctoral program survey: 32,000 student experiences. Paper presented at meeting of the Council of Graduate Schools, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. L. (2004). Professional knowledge, teacher education and self-study. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 375–419). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jablon, P. C. (2002). The status of science education doctoral programs in the United States: The need for core knowledge and skills. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(1). Retrieved May 13, 2010, from http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/ejse.html

  • Kennedy, M. (1998). Education reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, G., Loughran, J., & Lunenberg, M. (2005). Teaching teachers–studies into the expertise of teacher educators: An introduction to this theme issue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Kuerbis, P., Loving, C., Ramey-Gassert, L., Roychoudhury, A., & Spector, B. S. (1997). Professional knowledge standards for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of ­pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., Luykx, A., Buxton, C. A., & Shaver, A. (2007). The challenge of altering elementary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding linguistic and cultural diversity in science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1269–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2007). Science teacher as learner. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (2nd ed., pp. 1043–1065). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, A. (2003). Looking back and looking forward: Always becoming a teacher educator through self-study. Reflective Practice, 4(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, J. D., & Woodford, B. J. (2000). Re-envisioning the Ph.D. What concerns do we have? Seattle, WA: University of Washington Center for Instructional Development and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnegar, S. (1998). Introduction to methodology. In M. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teacher education (pp. 31–33). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. K. (2007). Forging a pedagogy of teacher education: The challenges of moving from classroom teacher to teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, 3, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. K. (2009). Developing a vision of teacher education: How my classroom teacher understandings evolved in the university environment. Studying Teacher Education, 5, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romberg, T. A., Carpenter, T., & Dremock, F. (Eds.). (2005). Understanding mathematics and science matters. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. (1997). Teaching teachers: How I teach IS the message. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Teaching about teaching: Purpose, passion, and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 32–47). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. (2007). Tracing the development of self-study in teacher education research and practice. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 1191–1210). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell, D., & Fitzgerald, L. (2004). Self study as teaching. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 69–102). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. S. (2006). Finding a canon and core: Meditations on the preparation of teacher educator-researchers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: A personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra O. Santau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Santau, A.O. (2012). Bridging the Gap Between a Science Laboratory Past and a Science Teacher Educator Present: Rethinking the Doctoral Program in Science Education. In: Bullock, S., Russell, T. (eds) Self-Studies of Science Teacher Education Practices. Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3904-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics