Skip to main content

Carbon Sequestration Potential of Silvopastoral and Other Land Use Systems in the Chilean Patagonia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Agroforestry ((ADAG,volume 8))

Abstract

This study was undertaken to quantify the carbon (C) sequestration potentials in three predominant ecosystems on the volcanic soils in Patagonia, Chile. The systems were: Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex P. Laws. – based silvopastoral systems arranged in strips (silvopasture), 18-year-old managed exotic stands (plantation), and natural prairie (prairie), in Patagonia, Chile. Most of the data used in the construction of C models were derived from experimental plots, where litterfall, decomposition, soil respiration, and soil C were measured. The values for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by cattle and fertilizer application were obtained from the literature. In the silvopasture and the plantation, total above- and belowground tree C stock accounted for 69% and 64% of the total system C, respectively. Total above- and belowground C pools were 224, 199, and 177 Mg C ha−1, with the aboveground: belowground C pool ratios of 1:10, 1:5, and 1:177, respectively, for silvopasture, plantation, and prairie. Soil respiration decreased in the order prairie >silvopasture >plantation. The C leached beyond the root zone (in leachate collected at 80 cm soil depth) decreased in the order plantation >prairie >silvopasture. Estimated system net C flux was +1.8, +2.5, and −2.3 Mg C ha−1 year−1 for the silvopasture, plantation, and prairie, respectively. Based on this study it is estimated that establishing silvopastoral systems with cattle over a land area of approximately 481 km2 or 0.33% of the Chilean Patagonia territory would be adequate to offset all C losses from cattle-based livestock systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Silva (2004).

References

  • Abohassan RA (2004) Carbon dynamics in a temperate agroforestry system in southern Ontario, Canada. M.Sc. thesis, Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, 122 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambrick AD, Whalen JK, Bradley RL, Cogliastro A, Gordon AM, Olivier A, Thevathasan NV (2010) Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Agroforest Syst 79:343–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, Laskowski R (2006) Litter decomposition: a guide to carbon and nutrients turnover. Adv Ecol Res, vol 38. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 428 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buol SW, Hole FD, McCracken RJ, Southard RJ (1997) Soil genesis and classification, 4th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, 527 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne KA, Kiely G, Leahy P (2007) Carbon sequestration determined using farm scale carbon balance and eddy covariance. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRamus HA, Clement TC, Giampola DD, Dickison PC (2003) Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages: efficiency of grazing management systems. J Environ Qual 32:269–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK, Wimjum JK, Lee JJ, Schroeder PE (1994) Integrated systems: assessing of promising agroforest and alternative land use practices to enhance carbon conservation and sequestration. Clim Change 30:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube F (2010) Carbon dynamics and other interactions in Pinus ponderosa (Dougl. ex Laws) and natural prairie agroecosystems established on degraded volcanic soils in the Aysén Region, Chilean Patagonia. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Forest Sciences, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile, 140 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube F, Zagal E, Stolpe N, Espinosa M (2009) The influence of land use change on the organic carbon distribution and microbial respiration in a volcanic soil of the Chilean Patagonia. For Ecol Manag 257:1695–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards NT (1982) The use of soda-lime for measuring respiration rates in terrestrial systems. Pedobiologia 23:321–330

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falk JH (1976) Energetics of a suburban lawn ecosystem. Ecology 57:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisons Instrument (1990) Instruction manual for the EA 1108 elemental analyzer. Rev. A2-90. American Society of Agronomy, San Carlos, 44 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Flessa H, Ruser R, Dörsch P, Kamp T, Jimenez MA, Munch JC, Beese F (2002) Integrated evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) from two farming systems in southern Germany. Agric Ecosyst Environ 91:175–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frangi JL, Richter LL, Barrera MD, Aloggia M (1997) Decomposition of Nothofagus fallen woody debris in forests of Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Can J For Res 27:1095–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson DJ (2009) Grasses and grasslands ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, 313 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gisi U (1997) Bodenökologie (2. Auflage). Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 351 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AM, Thevathasan NV (2005) How much carbon can be stored in Canadian agroecosystems using a silvopastoral approach? In: Mosquera-Losada MR, Rigueiro-Rodriguez A, McAdam J (eds) Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 210–218

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AM, Thevathasan NV, Nair PKR (2009) An agroecological foundation for temperate agroforestry. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 25–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall SA, Burke IC, Hobbs NT (2006) Litter and dead wood dynamics in Ponderosa pine forests along a 160-year chronosequence. Ecol Appl 16(6):2344–2355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SC, Firestone MK, Paul EA (1992) Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of ponderosa pine needles in a Mediterranean-type climate. Can J For Res 22:306–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirata M, Hasegawa N, Nomura M, Ito H, Nogami K, Sonoda T (2009) Deposition and decomposition of cattle dung in forest grazing in Kyushu, Japan. Ecol Res 24:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huygens D, Boeckx P, Van Cleemput O, Oyarzun C, Godoy R (2005) Aggregate and soil organic carbon dynamics in South Chilean Andisols. Biogeosciences 2:159–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • INE (2007a) VII Censo agropecuario y forestal. Existencia de ganado en las explotaciones agropecuarias y forestales por especie. Santiago, Chile (in Spanish). http://www.censoagropecuario.cl/noticias/09/07042009.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2010

  • INE (2007b) División Político-Administrativa y Censal, 2007. Santiago, Chile (in Spanish). Available at http://www.ine.cl/canales/chile_estadistico/territorio/division_politico_administrativa/pdf/DPA_COMPLETA.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2010

  • IPCC (1997) Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC/OECD/IEA, IPCC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Mashell K, Johnson CA (eds) Contribution of working group I to third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 881 p

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf. Accessed 6 Oct 2010

  • Kimmins JP (2004) Forest ecology: a foundation for sustainable forest management and environmental ethics in forestry, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 611 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2005) Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manag 220:242–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agroforest Syst 61:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron 108:237–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Huss J, Abohassan R (2006) Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree-based intercropping systems, southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforest Syst 66:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raich JW, Tufekcioglu A (2000) Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochemistry 48:71–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross DJ, Tate KR, Scott NA, Wilde RH, Rodda NJ, Townsend JA (2002) Afforestation of pastures with Pinus radiata influences soil carbon and nitrogen pools and mineralization and microbial properties. Aust J Soil Res 40:1303–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (2003) SAS user’s guide: statistics. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH, Ismail S (2004) Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agroforest Syst 60:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva F (2004) Final report on the ecological status of the Aysén Region. SAG – Agricultural Ministry, Government of Chile, Santiago, 143 p (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotomayor A, Teuber O, Moya I (2009) Resultados y experiencia sobre manejo de sistemas silvopastorales en la Region de Aysén. In: Teuber O (ed) Sistemas agroforestales para la región de Aysén. INIA-INFOR, Coyhaique, 211 p (in Spanish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soussana JP, Loiseau P, Vuichard N, Ceschia E, Balesdent J, Chevallier T, Arrouays D (2004) Carbon cycling and sequestration opportunities in temperate grassland. Soil Use Manage 20:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps WT, Linit MJ (1999) The problem of experimental design in temperate agroforestry. Agroforest Syst 44:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolpe NB, Dube F, Zagal E (2010) Calibration of CO2FIX to native forest, pine plantation, and pasture on a volcanic soil of the Chilean Patagonia. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci 60(3):235–244

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tans P (2010) Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide – Mauna Loa. NOAA/ESRL. Available at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/. Accessed 6 Oct 2010

  • Teller A (1988) Biomass, productivity and wood waste evaluation in a spruce (Picea abies) forest (Strinchmps 983). Commonw For Rev 7(2):129–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuber O, Ganderats S (2009) Características geográficas y edafoclimáticas de la región de Aysén. In: Teuber O (ed) Sistemas agroforestales para la región de Aysén: Cortinas cortaviento y silvopastoreo. INIA-INFOR, Coyhaique, 211 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (1997) Poplar leaf biomass distribution and nitrogen dynamics in a poplar-barley intercropped system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforest Syst 37:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Undurraga P, Zagal E, Sepúlveda G, Valderrama N (2009) Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in Andisol for six crop rotations with different soil management intensity. Chil J Agric Res 69(3):445–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Woignier T, Pochet G, Doumenc H, Dieudonné P, Duffours L (2007) Allophane: a natural gel in volcanic soils with interesting environmental properties. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 41:25–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SS, Liu CM, Liu YL (2003) Estimation of methane and nitrous oxide emission from animal production sector in Taiwan during 1990–2000. Chemosphere 52:1381–1388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yin X (1999) The decay of forest woody debris: numerical modeling and implications based on some 300 data cases from North America. Oecologia 121:81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ackowledgements

We sincerely wish to acknowledge and express our sincere thanks to Mr. Victor “Titi” Mata for hosting the research sites in his property near Coyhaique, to Silvia Marchetti and Luis Alvarez for assistance in the field, to Forestal Mininco S.A. - Aysén Project for logistics, to the Center of Biotechnolgy, Laboratory of Soil Science and Natural Resources, and Laboratory of Environmental Organic Chemistry of the University of Concepción, and Celulosa Arauco S.A. - Arauco Pulpmill for processing the samples and numerous laboratory analysis. Special thanks are also given to the Trapananda Center (University Austral of Chile), and Center for Investigations of Ecosystems in the Patagonia (CIEP) for logistics and support. In addition, we sincerely thank INFOR for sharing valuable information and data and authorizing the establishment of the plots in the San Gabriel Agroforestry Unit. The excellent review recommendations from two anonymous reviewers are also appreciated. This study was funded by a grant (Project No. 207.142.025-1.0) from the Direction of Investigations of the University of Concepción. Additional financial support was also obtained from CONICYT of the Chilean Government through a doctoral scholarship to F.D. and indirectly from SAI Global Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Dube .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

The following assumptions and calculations were used in order to build the models of carbon pools and fluxes within the pine-based silvopastoral system arranged in strip, the 18-year old Pinus ponderosa plantation, and the managed natural prairie:

  1.  1.

    The silvopasture and plantation have a tree density of 400 and 800 stems ha−1, respectively. Pine strips in the silvopasture occupy 22% of the area available for pasture and have never been thinned. All trees were pruned to heights of 2.8 and 4 m in 2006 and 2009, respectively.

  2.  2.

    Using inventory data obtained since the establishment of the pine plantations, the mean above and belowground C sequestration rates were calculated for the 1991–2003 period at the initial tree density, and then for the 2003–2009 periods after thinning to a density of 800 trees ha−1 in the Plantation and 400 trees ha−1 in the silvopasture.

  3.  3.

    Aboveground tree C pools include trunks, branches, twigs, needles and cones. Belowground C pools include thick roots superior to 5 mm diameter.

  4.  4.

    It was assumed that cattle will consume most of the aboveground pasture biomass produced during the year in the silvopasture and prairie (part of it returning to the system as faeces, methane, nitrous oxide, and respiration) and that only belowground biomass C will be added to the soil C pool. The aboveground grass biomass present in the plantation remains in the system as no grazing occurs therein. The C content of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) was determined after manually harvesting grazing material three times a year over a 2-year period. The C content of belowground net primary productivity and net annual C sequestration by pasture alone could then be calculated, considering a 40% addition to the recalcitrant soil C pool (Falk 1976).

  5.  5.

    Knowing the stocking rates and the amount of faeces produced annually and C content, the cattle respiration (kg CO2 ha−1 year−1), methane emissions from enteric fermentation, and nitrous oxide emissions from dung and urine patches, as well as their CO2-equivalents (IPCC 2001) were calculated using data published by Flessa et al. (2002), Yang et al. (2003), and Byrne et al. (2007). Carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions from a single animal are estimated to be 996, 56, and 1.29 kg head−1 year−1, respectively, and depend on the amount and kind of feed that is consumed. The reference weight per head unit is 500 kg. CO2-equivalents were calculated using the Global Warming Potentials (GWP), which determine the relative contribution of a given gas to the greenhouse effect. The GWP values represent how many times more deleterious than CO2 in a 100 year period are CH4 (21) and N2O (310) in terms of global warming. In addition, the number of cows per hectare in order to attain C neutrality was calculated as follows, using the net C sequestration values of 3.80 and 1.09 Mg C ha−1 year−1 for the silvopasture and prairie. For the silvopasture, 3.80 = [(56*#cows/1,000*21)/3.67) + (996*#cows/1,000/3.67) + (1.29*#cows/1,000*310)/3.67)]. For the Prairie, 1.09 = [(56*#cows/1,000*21)/3.67) + (996*#cows/1,000/3.67) + (1.29*#cows/1,000*310)/3.67)].

  6.  6.

    The annual mass loss values of cattle faeces obtained after a 12 month litterbag decomposition experiment made possible the calculation of net C additions to soil C pools, considering that 2.2 and 2.5 years are required to get a maximum decomposition in the silvopasture and prairie, respectively. The net addition to soil C pool in each treatment represents therefore the sum of annual C incorporations over these periods. Hirata et al. (2009) reported similar results, where cattle dung reached an average decomposition of 79.1% after 2.2 years.

  7.  7.

    Annual litterfall and needle decomposition in the plantation and the silvopasture were obtained from field measurements over a 2-year period to illustrate the importance of annual C inputs and net additions to soil C pools. It was assumed that annual fine root C turnover in pines is 30% of litterfall (Abohassan 2004).

  8.  8.

    Since time constraints did not permit to undertake a long term experiment for the decomposition of the ponderosa pine needles, a maximum mass loss of 84.5% for Scots pine needles in Scandinavia was assumed to be representative of the situation, considering the similar climatic conditions encountered and values of initial N and lignin contents found in green litter (Berg and Laskowski 2006; Dube 2010). Theoretically, the C contribution to soil from litterfall and fine root turnover for the last 18 years was 25 and 32 Mg C ha−1 in silvopasture and plantation, respectively. However, an average of 14.2% in the silvopasture and 14.5% in the plantation of the C added annually via litterfall and fine roots was released back into the atmosphere through microbial decomposition. Based on the results of the decomposition experiment, approximately 6 years (84.5%/14.2% year−1 in the silvopasture and 84.5%/14.5% year−1 in the plantation) would be required to obtain maximum needle decomposition. This represents 0.20 Mg C ha−1 year−1 (25 Mg C ha−1/18 years * 14.2% year−1) in the silvopasture and 0.26 Mg C ha−1 year−1 (32 Mg C ha−1/ 18 years * 14.5% year−1) in the plantation that are lost due to decomposition. Considering a maximum mass loss after a period of 6 years, the amount of C incorporated into the stable soil C pools will be 0.04 Mg C ha−1 year−1 (25 Mg C ha−1/18 years * 15.5%/6 years) in the silvopasture and 0.05 (32 Mg C ha−1/18 years * 15.5%/6 years) in the plantation. However, these values represent what is lost and gained from the annual litterfall, and do not consider accumulated litterfalls from the previous years that are gradually decomposing and also being added to the soil C pool. Taking this process into account, the sum of annual losses as decomposition during the 6 year period in the silvopasture and plantation reached 1.2 and 1.6 Mg C ha−1 year−1, respectively, whereas the net annual additions to stable soil C pools were 0.24 and 0.29 Mg C ha−1 year−1 for the silvopasture and plantation, respectively.

  9.  9.

    With respect to decomposition of necromass and coarse woody debris (CWD), the annual mass loss was determined using published k values (year−1) for decomposition of dead branches of Pinus ponderosa (Hart et al. 1992; Yin 1999; Hall et al. 2006) and boles/stumps of N. pumilio (Frangi et al. 1997). Knowing the dry weight of dead branches after 2 years of decomposition and CWD, and assuming a 95% loss of initial weights, it was possible to calculate their mass losses and net addition to soil C pools. It should be noted that decomposition of the duff needle layer is not considered here as it has already been accounted for in the calculation of annual litterfall decomposition.

  10. 10.

    Soil C sequestration for the upper 0–40 cm layer was determined using weighted averages of C contents at three measured depths and a bulk density of 0.9 g cm−3 (Dube et al. 2009). In the silvopastoral system, an average value was calculated from the C contents obtained within the tree strips and at 2.5 m intervals on either side of strips (up to 10.5 m, corresponding to the middle of the 21 m wide pasture strip).

  11. 11.

    Soil respiration values refer to total respiration, including tree root, mycorrhizae and microbial respiration, and annual decomposition losses of needles, fine roots, cattle faeces, necromass, and coarse woody debris. Annual soil respiration for the three ecosystems was calculated from the monthly respiration rates presented in this study. For the months that soil respiration was not measured, estimates were done as follows: A regression between soil respiration and air temperature (+5 cm) was adjusted for every treatment (R² = 0.94), using the values obtained in the field. Knowing the mean monthly superficial air temperatures, these equations were then used to estimate monthly soil respiration and check the values calculated initially, the differences being less than 5%. Within the silvopasture, it was assumed that soil respiration in the tree strip accounts for 22% from the spatial area, while respiration from 1 and 7.5 m from the tree strip accounts for 78%. Since respiration chambers were installed within the pine strips, at 1 m and at 7.5 m from the strips, tree roots growing into the grass band could be taken into consideration in the calculations.

  12. 12.

    In order to determine the annual amount of leaching C, it was assumed that 24% of the annual rainfall leaches to the ground water (Gisi 1997; Peichl et al. 2006). Annual rainfall at the research site is 1,206 mm out of which 290 mm ha−1 year−1 is lost as leaching. The mean annual total C concentrations of leached soil solution from the land uses were then used to estimate the annual leached C losses in conjunction with total annual leaching losses. As above, C leaching within the tree strip was assumed to account for 22% of the spatial area, whereas leaching from 1 and 7.5 m from the tree strip account for 78% of the area.

  13. 13.

    The annual atmospheric C deposition to the systems was determined as follows: knowing that the annual rainfall is 1,206 mm year−1, the volume occupied by this amount over 1 ha was 1.2 × 104 m3. Since the density of water is 1 g cm−3, 1% C of 1 l leaching soil solution is equivalent to 10 g C. Therefore, 0.12 Mg C ha−1 year−1 represents the amount of atmospheric deposition.

  14. 14.

    Since approximately 1.25% of N fertilizer applied to the soil is lost in the form of N2O emissions (IPCC 1997), and knowing the amount of N fertilizer applied to the pasture every 3 years, annual emissions of N2O and CO2-equivalent were estimated.

  15. 15.

    Carbon storage in ecosystems pools was calculated using the following equation:

    $$ {\text{C}}_{\text{pools}}={\text{C}}_{\text{agt}}+{\text{C}}_{\text{bgt}}+{\text{C}}_{\text{agg}}+{\text{C}}_{\text{soil}},$$

    where Cpools = total carbon stored in ecosystem pools, Cagt = aboveground tree carbon, Cbgt = belowground tree carbon, Cagg = aboveground grass carbon in the Ponderosa pine plantation and Csoil = soil organic carbon pool.

  16. 16.

    Positive or negative carbon flux into or out of the ecosystems was calculated using the following equation:

    $$ {\text{C}}_{\text{flux}}={\text{C}}_{\text{TrU}}+{\text{C}}_{\text{GrU}}+{\text{C}}_{\text{AtD}}+{\text{C}}_{\text{FecS}}+{\text{C}}_{\text{CwdS}}-{\text{C}}_{\text{SRes}}-{\text{C}}_{\text{Lch}}-{\text{C}}_{\text{Fert}}-{\text{C}}_{\text{AnC}}$$

    where Cflux = net carbon flux in the ecosystem, CTrU = carbon input via total tree uptake, CGrU = carbon input via total grass uptake, CAtD = carbon input through atmospheric depositions (rain and snow), CFecS = net addition to soil carbon pool via faeces input, CCwdS = net addition to soil carbon pool via coarse woody debris and necromass decomposition, CSRes = carbon output via total soil respiration, CLch = carbon leachate output from the soil solution, CFert = volatile carbon-equivalent output from fertilizer application, and CAnC = carbon output through pasture consumption by animals (divided between cattle fattening, faeces production and GHG emissions). Therefore, losses as animal respiration, CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation and N2O from faeces have already been accounted for in cattle consumption.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dube, F., Thevathasan, N.V., Zagal, E., Gordon, A.M., Stolpe, N.B., Espinosa, M. (2011). Carbon Sequestration Potential of Silvopastoral and Other Land Use Systems in the Chilean Patagonia. In: Kumar, B., Nair, P. (eds) Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1630-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics