Abstract
This chapter provides a definition of allelopathy, processes included and excluded from plant–plant allelopathic interactions, criteria needed to establish plant–plant allelopathic interactions, application of the Scientific Method, use of laboratory and field bioassays, and a short paragraph on the subject matter of the rest of the book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
An M, Johnson IR, Lovett J (1993) Mathematical modeling of allelopathy: biological response to allelochemicals and its interpretation. J Chem Ecol 19:2379–2388
Belz RG, Hurle K, Duke SO (2005) Dose response – a challenge for allelopathy? Nonlin Biol Toxicol Med 3:173–211
Bertin C, Harmon R, Akaogi M, Weidenhamer JD, Weston LA (2009) Assessment of the phytotoxic potential of m-tyrosine in laboratory soil bioassays. J Chem Ecol 35:1288–1294
Blum U (1999) Designing laboratory plant debris-soil bioassays: some reflections. In: Inderjit, Daskshini KMM, Foy CL (eds) Principles and practices in plant ecology: allelochemical interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 17–23
Blum U (2006) Allelopathy: a soil system perspective. In: Reigosa MJ, Pedrol N, González L (eds) Allelopathy: a physiological process with ecological implications. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 299–340
Blum U (2007) Can data derived from field and laboratory bioassays establish the existence of allelopathic interactions in nature? In: Fujii Y, Hiradate S (eds) Allelopathy: new concepts and methodologies. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, pp 31–38
Blum U, Shafer SR, Lehman ME (1999) Evidence for inhibitory allelopathic interactions involving phenolic acids in field soils: concepts vs. an experimental model. Crit Rev Plant Sci 18:673–693
Connell JH (1990) Apparent versus “real” competition in plants. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives of plant competition. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 9–26
Grodzinsky AM (1971) Problems and results of allelopathy in the work of Soviet scientists. In: National Academy of Sciences (ed) Biochemical interactions among plants. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp 44–51
Harper JL (1975) Allelopathy (a review). Q Rev Biol 50:493–495
Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, New York, NY
Inderjit, Del Moral R (1997) Is separating resource competition from allelopathy realistic? Bot Rev 63:221–230
Laidler KJ (1998) To light such a candle chapters in the history of science and technology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mahall BE, Callaway RM (1992) Root communication mechanisms and intracommunity distribution of two Mojave desert shrubs. Ecology 73:2145–2151
Molisch H (1937) Der Einfluss einer Pflanze auf die andere – allelopathie. Fisher, Jena
Molisch H (2001) The influence of one plant on another: allelopathy. In: Narwal SS (ed) LaFleur LJ and Mallik MAB (trans: from German). Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India
Nilsson MC (1994) Separation of allelopathy and resource competition by the boreal dwarf shrub Empetrum hermaphroditum hagerup. Oecologia 98:1–7
Rice EL (1974) Allelopathy. Academic Press, Orlando, FL
Rice EL (1979) Allelopathy An update. Bot Rev 45:15–109
Rice EL (1983) Pest control with nature’s chemicals: allelochemics and pheromones in gardening and agriculture. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK
Rice EL (1984) Allelopathy. Academic Press, Orlando, FL
Ridenour WM, Callaway RM (2001) The relative importance of allelopathy in interference: the effects of an invasive weed on a native bunchgrass. Oecologia 126:444–450
Romeo JT (2000) Raising the beam: moving beyond phytotoxicity. J Chem Ecol 26:2001–2014
Romeo JT, Weidenhamer JD (1998) Bioassays for allelopathy in terrestrial plants. In: Haynes KF, Millar JG (eds) Methods in chemical ecology: bioassay methods. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, pp 179–211
Sinkkonen A (2001) Density-dependent chemical interference – an extension of the biological response model. J Chem Ecol 27:1513–1523
Sinkkonen A (2003) A model describing chemical interference caused by decomposing residues at different densities of growing plants. Plant Soil 250:315–322
Sinkkonen A (2007) Modeling the effects of autotoxicity on density-dependent phytotoxicity. J Theor Biol 244:218–227
Stowe LG (1979) Allelopathy and its influence on the distribution of plants in an Illinois old-field. J Ecol 67:1065–1085
Thijs H, Shann JR, Weidenhamer JD (1994) The effects of phytotoxins on competitive outcome in a model system. Ecology 75:1959–1964
Weidenhamer JD (1996) Distinguishing resource competition and chemical interference: overcoming the methodological impasse. Agron J 88:866–875
Weidenhamer JD, Hartnett DC, Romeo JT (1989) Density-dependent phytotoxicity: distinguishing resource competition and allelopathic interference in plants. J Appl Ecol 26:613–624
Whittaker RH, Feeny PP (1971) Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. Science 171:757–770
Williamson GB (1990) Allelopathy, Koch’s postulates, and the neck riddle. In: Grace JB, Tilman GD (eds) Perspectives in plant competition. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 143–162
Willis RJ (1985) The historical bases of the concept of allelopathy. J Hist Biol 18:71–102
Willis RJ (1994) Terminology and trends in allelopathy. Allelopathy J 1:6–28
Willis RJ (2007) The history of allelopathy. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Wu H, Pratley J, Lemerle D, Haig T (2000) Laboratory screening for allelopathic potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum) accessions against annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Aust J Agric Res 51:259–266
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blum, U. (2011). Plant–Plant Allelopathic Interactions. In: Plant-Plant Allelopathic Interactions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0683-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0683-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0682-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0683-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)