Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Labour and Energy Intensity: A Study of the Pulp and Paper Industries in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Capital and Development

Abstract

This chapter is an attempt to understand the relationship between the labour and energy intensity for firms drawn from pulp and paper industries in Indian manufacturing. Pulp and paper industry accounts for a considerable share of the industrial enterprises, production, employment and exports in the Indian economy and also one of the energy-intensive industries in Indian manufacturing. This chapter uses data from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE), at the unit level for the period 1992–2000. Analysis from the cross-tabulation of energy and labour intensity of the firms in this industry suggests that energy intensity is higher for the BSE-listed firms; however, the labour intensity is found higher for the non-listed firms. Further, energy and labour intensity is higher for the domestic when compared to foreign firms. The econometric analysis of the energy intensity and other firm-specific characteristics suggests that labour and energy intensity has an inverted U-shape relationship, suggesting a substitution possibility between energy and labour for the pulp and paper industries in India. The listed firms are found to be more energy intensive as compared to the non-listed firms. More importantly, technology import is found negatively related to energy intensity of firms, suggesting that firms in these industries could be using technology import and knowledge sharing from their foreign collaborators for energy saving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Industrialized countries that are listed in Annex-I of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change; for details, see http://www.oecd.org/document/13/0,3343,en_2649_34361_1849485_1_1_1_1,00.html

References

  • Ahluwalia IJ (1991) Productivity and growth in Indian manufacturing – trends in productivity and growth. Oxford University Press, New York/New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RGD (1938) Mathematical analysis for economists. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubrahmanya MH (2006) Labour productivity, energy intensity and economic performance in small enterprises: a study of brick enterprises cluster in India. Energy Conver Manage 47:763–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett AH, Reutter K, Thompson H (1998) Electricity substitution: some local industrial evidence. Energy Econ 20:411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caloghiro Y, Mourelatos A, Thompson H (1997) Industrial energy substitution during the 1980s in the Greek economy. Energy Econ 19:476–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron T, Schwartz SL (1980) Inflationary expectations and the demand for capital, labor, and energy in Canadian manufacturing industries. In: Ziemba WT et al (eds) Energy policy modeling: U.S. and Canadian experiences. Matinus Nijhoff Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang K (1994) Capital-energy substitution and the multi-level CES production function. Energy Econ 16:22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri S (2002) Economic reforms and industrial structure in India. Econ Pol Wkly 37(02):155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen LR, Jorgenson D, Lau LJ (1971) Conjugate duality and the transcendental logarithmic production function. Econometrica 39:255–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M (1998) Monitoring and enforcement of environmental policy. In: Tietenberg T, Folmer H (eds) International yearbook of environmental and resource economics, vol III. Edward Elgar Publishers, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Das D, Wadhwa D, Kalita G (2009) The employment potential of labor intensive industries in India’s organized manufacturing. Working paper no. 236. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison EF (1974) Accounting for United States economic growth 1929 to 1969. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison EF (1979) Accounting for slower economic growth. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison EF (1985) Trends in American economic growth 1929–1982. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny M, Fuss M, Waverman L (1981) Substitution possibilities for energy: evidence from US and Canadian manufacturing industries. In: Berndt ER, Field BC (eds) Modeling and measuring natural resource substitution. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Doonan J, Lanoie P, Laplante B (2005) Determinants of environment performance in Canadian pulp and paper industries: an assessment from inside the industry. Ecol Econ 55:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W, Levine R (2002) Chapter 3: It’s not factor accumulation: stylized facts and growth models. In: Klaus S-H (ed) Economic growth: sources, trends, and cycles, vol 6, 1st edn. Central Bank of Chile, Santiago, pp 061–114

  • Felipe J (1997) Total factor productivity growth in East Asia: a critical survey, EDRC report series number 65, Economics and Development Resource Center, Asian Development Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulon J, Lanoie P, Laplante B (2002) Incentives for pollution control: regulation or information? J Environ Econ Manage 44:169–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli I, Roy J (1995) Oil demand elasticities in India. Indian J Appl Econ 5(1):75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldar B (2000) Employment growth in organized manufacturing in India. Econ Pol Wkly 35(14):1191–1195

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldar B (2010) Energy intensity of Indian manufacturing firms: effect of energy prices, technology and other firm characteristics. Paper presented during the conference on frontier issues in technology, Development and Environment at MSE, Chennai

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan W, Jorgenson D (1991) Productivity trends and the cost of reducing CO2 emissions. Energy J 12(1):67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Hseu JS, Shang JK (2005) Productivity changes of pulp and paper industry in OECD countries 1991–2000: a non-parametric malmquist approach. For Policy Econ 7:411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson EA, Jorgenson D (1974) US energy policy and economic growth 1975–2000. Bell J Econ Manage Sci 5:461–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha R, Murty MN, Paul S, Rao BB (1993) An analysis of technological change, factor substitution and economies of scale in manufacturing industries in India. Appl Econ 25:1337–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Fraumeni BM (1981) Relative prices and technical change. In: Berndt ER, Fields B (eds) Modeling and measuring natural resources substitution. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Gollop FM, Fraumeni M (1987) Productivity and U.S. economic growth. North Holland, Amsterdam/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A (2003) Energy intensity: a quantitative exploration for Indian manufacturing. IGIDR Working paper no. 152. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.468440

  • Lashof D, Tirpak D (eds) (1990) Policy options for stabilizing global climate: report to Congress, Executive summary, US Environmental Protection Agency, No. 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Buongiorno J, Ince PJ (2004) Effects of size and age on the survival and growth of pulp and paper mills. J For Econ 10:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma H, Oxley L, Gibson J (2009) Substitution possibilities and determinants of energy intensity for China. Energy Policy 37:1793–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud S (2000) The energy demand in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan: some further results. Energy Econ 22:641–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongia P, Sathaye J (1998a) Productivity trends in India’s energy intensive industries: a growth accounting analysis, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Working paper no. 41838, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongia P, Sathaye J (1998b) Productivity growth and technical change in India’s energy intensive industries – a survey, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Working paper no. 41840, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongia P, Schumacher K, Sathaye J (2001) Policy reforms and productivity growth in India’s energy intensive industries. Energy Policy 29:715–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraj R (2004) Fall in organized manufacturing employment – a brief note. Econ Pol Wkly 39(30):3387–3390

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan G, Barik K (1999) Total factor productivity growth in developing economies: a study of selected industries in India. Econ Pol Wkly 34(31):M92–M97

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy J (1992) Demand for energy in Indian manufacturing industries. Daya Publishing, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy J, Sathaye J, Sanstad A, Mongia P, Schumacher K (1999) Productivity trends in India’s energy intensive industries. Energy J 20(3):33–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahu SK, Narayanan K (2010) Determinants of energy intensity in Indian manufacturing industries: a firm level analysis. MPRA paper no. 21646, University Library of Munich, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahu SK, Narayanan K (2011) Determinants of energy intensity in Indian manufacturing industries: a firm level study. Eurasian J Econ Bus 4(8):13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Roy J (1995) Inter-fuel substitution during post oil embargo period - case study of two energy intensive manufacturing industries in India. The Indian Econ J 43(2):33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathaye JA, Ravindranath NH (1998) Climate change mitigation in the energy and forestry sectors of developing countries. Annu Rev Eng Environ 23:387–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher K, Sathaye J (1999) India’s pulp and paper industry: productivity and energy efficiency. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-41843

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39:312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama A (1993) Analytical methods in economics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Uma R, Unni J (2004) Unorganized and organized manufacturing in India: potential for employment generating growth. Econ Pol Wkly 39(41):4568–4580

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (1998) Kyoto protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on climate change, available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf

  • Varian HR (1984) Microeconomic analysis. W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyant J, Davidson O, Dowlatabadi H, Edmonds J, Grubb M, Parson EA, Richels R, Rotmans J, Shukla PR, Tol RSJ, Cline W, Fankhauser S (1996) Integrated assessment of climate change: an overview and comparison of approaches and results. In: Bruce JP, Lee H, Erik HF (eds) Climate change 1995 – economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000) Greening industry: new roles for communities, markets, and governments. World Bank/Oxford University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi F (2000) Dynamic energy-demand models: a comparison. Energy Econ 22:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge comments and suggestions by Prof. B. N. Goldar and Prof. N. S. Siddharthan. The errors that remain are our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, India

    Santosh Kumar Sahu & K. Narayanan

Authors
  1. Santosh Kumar Sahu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Narayanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh Kumar Sahu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Madras School of Economics, Chennai, 600 004, Tamil Nadu, India

    Natteri Siddharthan

  2. , Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, 400 076, Maharashtra, India

    Krishnan Narayanan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sahu, S.K., Narayanan, K. (2013). Labour and Energy Intensity: A Study of the Pulp and Paper Industries in India. In: Siddharthan, N., Narayanan, K. (eds) Human Capital and Development. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0857-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation