Skip to main content

Delta-ADC (Apparent Diffusion Coefficient) Analysis in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XIV

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 114))

Abstract

We have developed the delta-apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), a new parameter of the water dynamics of brain tissue using MRI. Delta-ADC is the changes in regional ADC values of the brain during the cardiac cycle. The study included 6 idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients (iNPH group) and 12 healthy volunteers (control group). ECG-triggered single-shot diffusion echo planar imaging (b = 0 and 1,000 s/mm2) was used on a 1.5-T MRI. The delta-ADC image was calculated from the maximum minus the minimum ADC value of all cardiac phase images (20 phases) on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Delta-ADC values in the white matter of the frontal, temporal, and occipital lobe were obtained. Delta-ADC values in the iNPH group were significantly higher than those in the control group in all regions. ADC values in the iNPH were also significantly higher than those in the control group, but the differences in the ADC between the groups in each region were much lower than those for the delta-ADC. Although the changes in the delta-ADC and ADC values were similar, there was no significant correlation between the delta-ADC and the ADC. These results suggest that the ADC and the delta-ADC may reflect different kinds of water dynamics. The ADC depends on the water content in brain tissue. On the other hand, delta-ADC depends on not only the water content, but also on the degree of the fluctuation of the water molecules. Delta-ADC analysis makes it possible to obtain non-invasively new and more detailed information on the regional brain condition in iNPH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson AW, Gore JC (1994) Analysis and correction of motion artifacts in diffusion weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 32(3):379–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anik Y, Demirci A, Anik I, Etus V, Arslan A (2008) Apparent diffusion coefficient and cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements in patients with hydrocephalus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(3):392–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brockstedt S, Borg M, Geijer B et al (1999) Triggering in quantitative diffusion imaging with single-shot EPI. Acta Radiol 40(3):263–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chenevert TL, Pipe JG (1991) Effect of bulk tissue motion on quantitative perfusion and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 19(2):261–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Corkill RG, Garnett MR, Blamire AM, Rajagopalan B, Cadoux-Hudson TA, Styles P (2003) Multi-modal MRI in normal pressure hydrocephalus identifies pre-operative haemodynamic and diffusion coefficient changes in normal appearing white matter correlating with surgical outcome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 105(3):193–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Del Bigio MR (1993) Neuropathological changes caused by hydrocephalus. Acta Neuropathol 85(6):573–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dorenbeck U, Schlaier J, Feuerbach S, Seitz J (2005) Diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnostic evaluation of the hydrocephalus in patients with acute or chronic increase in cerebral pressure. Rofo 177(1):99–104, German

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Greitz D, Wirestam R, Franck A et al (1992) Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. Neuroradiology 34(5):370–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hattingen E, Jurcoane A, Melber J et al (2010) Diffusion tensor imaging in patients with adult chronic idiopathic hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 66(5):917–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leliefeld PH, Gooskens RH, Braun KP, Ramos LM, Uiterwaal CS, Regli LP, Tulleken CA, Kappelle LJ, Hanlo PW (2009) Longitudinal diffusion-weighted imaging in infants with hydrocephalus: decrease in tissue water diffusion after cerebrospinal fluid diversion. J Neurosurg Pediatr 4(1):56–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura T, Miyati T, Kasai H et al (2009) Bulk motion-independent analyses of water diffusion changes in the brain during the cardiac cycle. Radiol Phys Technol 2(2):133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nunes RG, Jezzard P, Clare S (2005) Investigations of the efficiency of cardiac-gated methods for the acquisition of diffusion-weighted images. J Magn Reson Imaging 177(1):102–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Robson MD, Porter DA (2005) Reconstruction as a source of artifact in nongated single-shot diffusion-weighted EPI. Magn Reson Imaging 23:899–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Skare S, Andersson JL (2001) On the effects of gating in diffusion imaging of the brain using single shot EPI. Magn Reson Imaging 19(8):1125–1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Summers P, Staempfli P, Jaermann T et al (2006) A preliminary study of the effects of trigger timing on diffusion tensor imaging of the human spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(9):1952–1961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Mase .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Osawa, T. et al. (2012). Delta-ADC (Apparent Diffusion Coefficient) Analysis in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. In: Schuhmann, M., Czosnyka, M. (eds) Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XIV. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 114. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0955-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0956-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics