Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Führung

  • Chapter
Arbeits-, Organisations- und Personalpsychologie für Bachelor

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Zusammenfassung

Was muss eine Führungskraft können? Jeder Chef und jede Chefin hat sich gegen Konkurrenz durchgesetzt und hohe Fachkompetenz bewiesen. Diese Fähigkeiten haben dabei geholfen aufzusteigen. Doch in der Rolle der Führungskraft sind neue Kompetenzen gefordert: Mitarbeitende müssen motiviert und inspiriert werden, um die beste Leistung zu bringen. Im Kapitel Führung werden deshalb theoretische Ansätze vorgestellt, die unterschiedliche Einflussfaktoren auf den Führungserfolg in den Mittelpunkt stellen. Diese reichen von Persönlichkeitseigenschaften und Verhaltensweisen der Führungskräfte über situative Bedingungen im Arbeitsalltag bis hin zu Interaktionsansätzen. Zudem wird zusätzlich ein Einblick in den Arbeitsalltag von Führungskräften gegeben. Welchen Dilemmata stehen sie gegenüber?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Alvesson, M., & Berg, P. O. (1992). Corporate Culture and Organizational Symbolism. Berlin, New York: de Guyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B., & Bass, B. (1987). Transformational leadership, charisma and beyond. In: J. Hunt, B. R. Baliga, H. P. Dachler & C. A. Schriesheim (Hrsg.), Emerging leadership vistas (S. 29–49) Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Reichard, R. J., Hannah, S. T., Walumbwa, F. O., & Chan, A. (2009). 100 Years of Leadership Intervention Studies: A Meta-Analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 764–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsay, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational Leadership: A Response to Critiques. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman. Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions (S. 49–80). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., … & Kern, J. (2001). The agile manifesto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, J. Z., Rentsch, J. R., Small, E. E., Davenport, S. W., & Bergman, S. M. (2012). The shared leadership process in decision-making teams. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(1), 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birasnav, M. (2013). Implementation of supply chain management practices: The role of transformational leadership. Global Business Review, 14(2), 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blickle, G. (2004): Einflusskompetenz in Organisationen. Psychologische Rundschau, 55 (2), 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blickle, G., & Witzki, A. (2008). New psychological contracts in the world of work: economic citizens or victims of the market? The situation in Germany. Society and Business Review, 3(2), 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 901–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2002). Separating the developmental and evaluative performance appraisal uses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 391–412. doi:10.1023/A:1012872907525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H., & Kowalevski, S. (2013). Gesunde Führung. Wie Unternehmen eine gesunde Performancekultur entwickeln. Überlingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, T. (1888) On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History. New York: Stokes & Brother.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carte, T. A., Chidambaram, L., & Becker, A. (2006). Emergent leadership in self-managed virtual teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(4), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 130–135. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.74.1.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor (NEO-FFI) Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Guinea, A. O., Webster, J., & Staples, D. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information & Management, 49(6), 301–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 421–433. doi:10.1037/apl0000085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeNisi, A. S., & Pritchard, R. D. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2, 253–277. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006. 00042.x

  • Drucker, P. F. (1998). Die Praxis des Managements. Düsseldorf: Econ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member-exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elger, C. E. (2009). Neuroleadership: Erkenntnisse der Hirnforschung für die Führung von Mitarbeitern. München: Haufe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felfe, J. (2009). Mitarbeiterführung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felfe, J., & Heinitz, K. (2010). The impact of consensus and agreement of leadership perceptions on commitment, OCB and customer satisfaction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 279–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S., Weber, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2017). Auf dem Weg zur agilen organisation – Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Untersuchung. Bisher unveröffentlichtes Arbeitspapier des Instituts für Personalforschung an der HS Pforzheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fittkau-Garthe, H., & Fittkau, B. (1971). Fragebogen zur Vorgesetzten-Verhaltens-Beschreibung (FVVB). Handanweisung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 419–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S. (2008), Total Leadership: Be a Better Leader, Have a Richer Life, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W., Avolio, B. and Walumbwa, F. (2005), Authentic Leadership Theory & Practice, Elsevier Science, Bridgewater, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghadiri, A., Habermacher, A., & Peters, T. (2012). Neuroleadership. A Journey Through the Brain for Business Leaders. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. (1996). Sprachspiele der Mikropolitik. Zwischen Aufklärung und Verwirrung. Organisationsentwicklung, 3, 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D. (2002). Führung und Innovation. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebert, D., & von Rosenstiel, L. (2002). Organisationspsychologie: Person und Organisation. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. E., & Stewart, L. P. (2009). Conversing about performance: Discursive resources for the appraisal interview. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 473–501. doi:10.1177/0893318908327159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grille, A., Kauffeld, S., Sauer, N, & Schulte, E.-M. (2017). Führung teilen, Leistung ernten mit dem Online-Tool SPLIT. PERSONALquarterly, 69, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grille, A., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). Development and preliminary validation of the Shared Professional Leadership Inventory for Teams (SPLIT). Psychology, 6(01), 75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grille, A., Schulte, E. M., & Kauffeld, S. (2015). Promoting shared leadership: A multilevel analysis investigating the role of prototypical team leader behavior, psychological empowerment, and fair rewards. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 324-339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groß, M. (2017). Innovationen im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung: Chancen und Herausforderungen für Topmanager und Mitarbeiter. Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grote, S., & Kauffeld, S. (2007). Stabilisieren oder dynamisieren: Das Balance-Inventar der Führung. In J. Erpenbeck & L. von Rosenstiel (Hrsg.), Handbuch Kompetenzmessung (S. 317–336). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, S., Kauffeld, S., & Weide, C. (2009). Stabilisierende und dynamisierende Kompetenzen von Führungskräften: Das Balance-Inventar der Führung. In S. Kauffeld, S. Grote & E. Frieling (Hrsg.), Handbuch Kompetenzentwicklung (S.107–123). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahnzog, S. (2016). Die Chance der Unvollkommenheit: Warum unsere Schattenseiten der Schlüssel zu unserem Potenzial sind. Kailash Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. B., Li, N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2014). Leader-member exchange (LMX) in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX’s influence on OCB and turnover intention. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 314–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häusling, A., & Rutz, B. (2017). Agile Führungsstrukturen und Führungskulturen zur Förderung der Selbstorganisation – Ausgestaltung und Herausforderungen. In Struktur und Kultur einer Leadership-Organisation (pp. 105–122). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentze, J., Kammel, A., & Lindert, K. (1997). Personalführungslehre: Grundlagen, Funktionen und Modelle der Führung. UTB Nr. 1374. Bern: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersey, B., & Blanchard, K. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, G., & Lauer, L. (2012). Führung auf Distanz und E-Leadership – die Zukunft der Führung? In Die Zukunft der Führung (pp. 103-118). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkin, T. R., & Tracey, J. B. (1999). The relevance of charisma for transformational leadership in stable organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmieleski, K. M., Cole, M. S., Baron, R. A. (2012). Shared authentic leadership and new venture performance. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1476–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J. E. (2013). Shared leadership and innovation: The role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(2), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 99(3), 390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Hall-Marenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossiep, R., Bittner, J., & Berndt, W. (2008). Mitarbeitergespräche – wirksam, nachhaltig, motivierend. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (2001). Allgemeine Umweltsoziologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, S. Z. (2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 106, 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P.K., Li, N.P, & Teicher, E.A. (2010). Who is James Bond? The Darf Triada s an Agentic Social Style. Individual Differences Research, 8(2),111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of Consideration and Initiating Structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D. Wu, A., & Chow, C. W. (2008). Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEOs’ transformational leadership on firm innovation. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 582–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N. (2001). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18 (4), 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S., Sauer, N., & Handke, L. (2017). Shared Leadership. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für angewandte Organisationspsychologie, 48, 235–238. doi: 10.1007/s11612-017-0381-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1993). Credibility: How leaders gain and lose it, why people demand it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leckelt, M., Küfner, A. C. P., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 856-871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created »social climates«. Journal of Social Psychology, 10 (3), 43–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, M., & Wheeler, R. (2005). LJI – Leadership judgement indicator. Oxford: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loth, N. (2016). Erfolgreiches Gesundheitsmanagement für Führungskräfte. Eine gesundheitsfördernde Führung als Fundament für gesunde Mitarbeiter. Diplomica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., Hodgetts, R. M., & Rosenkrantz, S. (1988). Real managers. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. (2007). The business brain in close-up. Business Week, 23, 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A., Smith, B. R., Dixon, A. L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 232-245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, A. L., Klonek, F. E., & Kauffeld, S. (2017). Appraisal participation and perceived voice in annual appraisal interviews: Uncovering contextual factors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24, 230–245. doi:10.1177/ 1548051816655990

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, A. L., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Kauffeld, S. (2017). What happens during annual appraisal interviews? How leader-follower interactions unfold and impact interview outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 1054–1074. doi:10.1037/apl0000219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzel, W., Grotzfeld, S., & Haub, C (2009). Mitarbeitergespräche: Mitarbeiter motivieren, richtig beurteilen und effektiv einsetzen. Planegg: Haufe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J., & Yukl, G. A. (1993). Managerial Level and Submit Function as Determinants of Networking Behavior in Organizations. Group & Organization Management, 18 (3), 328–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (2002). Führen und führen lassen. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (2004). Das Mitarbeitergespräch. Leonberg: Rosenberger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (2006). Mikropolitik: Stand der Forschung und Reflexion. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50 (4), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. L. (2005). Implicit theories and leadership perceptions in the thick of it: The effects of prototype matching, group setbacks, and group outcomes. In B. Schyns & J. R. Meindl (Hrsg.), The leadership horizon series. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. W., Holesgrove, M., & Pathak, R. (2015). Improving productivity with self-organised teams and agile leadership. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(1), 112–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. & Williams, K.M. (2002). The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissim, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. Journal of Research in personality, 36, 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L., & Manz, C. C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self- and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics, 6, 172–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peus, C., Braun, S., & Frey, D. (2015). Leadership Style Asessment (LSA). Ein Situational Judgment Test zur Erfassung von Führungsstilen. Manual. Göttinge: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, R. F., Bono, J. E., Heinitz, K., Rowold, J., Duehr, E., & Judge, T. A. (2012). The relative impact of complementary leader behaviors: Which matter most?. Leadership Quaterly, 23(3), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichel, I. & Becker, L. (2015). The Agile Mindset and Motivation: An Exploratory Work about the Connection of the Two Constructs. In Wald, A., Wagner, R., Schneider, C., & Gschwendtner, M. (Eds.): Advanced Project Management (Vol. 4) – Flexibility and Innovative Capacity (S. 107–128). Nürnberg: GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, M. T., Warka, J., Babasa, B., Betancourt, R., & Hooker, S. (1994). Development of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 793–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. (2000). Organizational behavior. Concepts-controversies-applications. Englewood Clifs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, D., & Ringleb, A. H. (2009). Defining NeuroLeadership as a field. NeuroLeadership Journal, 2, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. (2012). Leader-member-exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of LMX across 23 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1097–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowold, J., & Borgmann, L. (2009). Zum Zusammenhang zwischen ethischer Führung, Arbeitszufriedenheit und affektivem Commitment. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 2, 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, N. C., Honert, M., & Kauffeld, S. (2009). Leadership-Studie 2009 – Führen in Zeiten der Krise. Vortrag bei dem 8. Kongress für Wirtschaftspsychologie, Potsdam, 14.–15. Mai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, W. (1999). Restrictive control and information pathologies in organizations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schyns, B., & Von Collani, G. 2002. A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11 (2), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silversthorne, C. (2001). Leadership effectiveness and personality: A cross-cultural evaluation. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, E. E., & Rentsch, J. R. (2011). Shared leadership in teams. Journal of Personnel Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solansky, S. T. (2008). Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurk, D., Keller, A.C., & Hirschi, A. (2015). Do Bad Guys Get Ahead or Fall Behind? Relationships oft he Dark Triad of Personality with Objective and subjective Career Success. Social Psycological and Personality Science, 7(2), 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K. & Kessler, T. (2013) Leader performance and prototypicality: their inter-relationship and impact on leaders’ identity entrepreneurship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43 7: 606-613. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, N. K, Schuh, S., Haslam, S. A., Perez, A. and van Dick, R. (2015) ›Of the group‹ and ›for the group‹: How followership is shaped by leaders’ prototypicality and group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45 2: 180-190. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock-Homburg, R. (2008). Personalmanagement. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, R., & Schmidt, W. H. (1973). How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 162–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. A. (2005). Proactive personality and job performance. A social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1011–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türk, K. (1995). Entpersonalisierte Führung. In: A. Kieser, G. Reber & R. Wunderer (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch der Führung (S. 328–340). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., Russ, M. & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The leadership Quarterly, 18 (4), 298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, D. (2011). Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1078–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Quaquebeke, N., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2008). Entwicklung und erste Validierung zweier Instrumente zur Erfassung von Führungskräfte-Kategorisierung im deutschsprachigen Raum. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 52, 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigoda, E. (2003). Developments in Organizational Politics: How Political Dynamics affect Employee Performance in Modern Work Sites. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and Decision Making. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V.H., & Jago, A.G. (2007). The role of situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J. (1994). Führung von Arbeitsgruppen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J. (2001). Gruppenarbeit. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (S. 483–507). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J. (2002). Führung von Arbeitsgruppen (Habilitationsschrift). Dortmund: Universität Dortmund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J., & Rosenstiel, L. von (2004). Führung. In H. Schuler, Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie (S. 475–513). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibler, J. (2001). Personalführung. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R. (2000). Führung und Zusammenarbeit. Eine unternehmerische Führungslehre. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderer, R., & Grunewald, W. (1980). Führungslehre. Berlin: de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, D., & Immerwahr J. (1983). Putting the Work Ethic to Work: A Public Agenda Report on Restoring America’s Competitive Vitality. New York: The Public Agenda Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Theory and Research on Leadership in Organisations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 3 (pp. 147–197). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, K. (2015). Gesundheitsorientierte Führung: Der Einfluss der Führungskultur auf die Gesundheit der Mitarbeiter. Igel Verlag RWS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, W., Sosik, J. J., Riggio, R. E., & Yang, B. (2012). Relationships between transformational and active transactional leadership and followers’ organizational identification: The role of psychological empowerment. Leadership and Organizational Identification, 186–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwingmann, I., Wegge, J., Wolf, S., Rudolf, M., Schmidt, M., & Richter, P. (2014). Is transformational leadership healthy for employees? A multilevel analysis in 16 nations. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1–2), 24–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Spielmannstraße 19, 38106, Braunschweig, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Simone Kauffeld & Dr. Nils Christian Sauer

  2. Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Von-Liebig-Str. 20, 53359, Rheinbach, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Patrizia M. Ianiro-Dahm

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Simone Kauffeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Patrizia M. Ianiro-Dahm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dr. Nils Christian Sauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Deutschland

    Simone Kauffeld

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kauffeld, S., Ianiro-Dahm, P.M., Sauer, N.C. (2019). Führung. In: Kauffeld, S. (eds) Arbeits-, Organisations- und Personalpsychologie für Bachelor. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56013-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56013-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56012-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56013-6

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation