Skip to main content

Multi-Objective Decision Analysis — the Right Objectives?

  • Conference paper
Large-Scale Modelling and Interactive Decision Analysis

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 273))

Abstract

A number of different authors, over a considerable period of time, have pointed out that there is a discernable lack of applications of MODM techniques in practice (cf. Hwang and Masud 1979; Lockett et al. 1984). Whilst at first glance there appears to be a marked increase in reported applications in the recent literature, a closer examination reveals that many of the papers in fact merely put forward generalised models — i.e. proposals for applications — or deal with the solution of highly idealised problems. Certainly, there are not a great many papers which describe applications involving a real decision maker and even fewer where the results obtained in the analysis are reported to have actually been implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvord, C.H. (1983). The Pros and Cons of Goal Programming: A Reply. Computers and Operations Research, 10(1): 61–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benayoun, R., de Montgolfier, J., Tergny, J., and Larichev, O. (1971). Linear Programming with Multiple Objective Functions: Step Method (STEM). Mathematical Programming, 1(3): 366–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff, E.E. (1984). A-Posteriori Trade-Off Analysis in Reference Point Approaches. In: Grauer, M. and Wierzbicki, A.P. (Eds.), Interactive Decision Analysis. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 229. Springer-Verlag, Berlin : 139–145.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Kluyver, C.A. (1979). An Exploration of Various Goal Programming Formulations — with Application to Advertising Media Scheduling. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30(2): 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.S. (1973). An Empirical Investigation of a Man-Machine Interactive Approach to the Solution of the Multiple Criteria Problem. In: Cochrane, J.L., and Zeleny, M. (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina: 202–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion, A.M., Dyer, J.S. and Feinberg, A. (1972). An Interactive Approach for Multicriterion Optimization with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department. Management Science, 19(4): 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C.-L. and Masud, A.S.M. (1979) Multiple Objective Decision Making — Methods and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 164. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ignizio, J.P. (1976). Goal Programming and Extensions. Lexington Books, Massachussetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, G., Hetherington, B., and Yallup, P. (1984). Subjective Estimation and its Use in MCDM. In: Haimes, Y.Y. and Chankong, V. (Eds.), Decision Making with Multiple Objectives. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 242. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 358–374.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Monarchi, D.E., Kisiel, C.C., and Duckstein, L. (1973). Interactive Multiobjective Programming in Water Resources: A Case Study. Water Resources Research, 9(4): 837–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, K.R. (1978). A Proxy Approach to Multi-Attribute Decision Making. Management Science, 24(6): 675–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothermel, M.A. and Schilling, D.A. (1984). A Comparative Study of Three Methods of Elliciting Preference Information. Omega, 12(4): 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, M.K. and Zeleny, M. (1977). MCDM – State and Future of the Arts. In: Starr, M.K. and Zeleny, M. (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Studies in the Management Sciences, Vol. 6. North-Holland, Amsterdam: 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenius, J. (1975). Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multicriterion Optimization. Management Science, 21(12): 1387–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. (1981). The Pros and Cons of Goal Programming. Computers and Operations Research, 8(4): 357–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bischoff, E.E. (1986). Multi-Objective Decision Analysis — the Right Objectives?. In: Fandel, G., Grauer, M., Kurzhanski, A., Wierzbicki, A.P. (eds) Large-Scale Modelling and Interactive Decision Analysis. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 273. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02473-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02473-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-16785-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-02473-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics