Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aktionsforschung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspektiven kritischer Psychologie und qualitativer Forschung

Zusammenfassung

Martin Dege rekonstruiert in seinem Beitrag die Entwicklung der Aktionsforschung von ihren Anfängen bei Jacob Levy Moreno und Kurt Lewin zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts bis hin zu den zeitgenössischen Dialog-Ansätzen und der in Lateinamerika, Asien und Afrika entstandenen Participatory Action Research. Dabei verfolgt Dege die These, dass der Aktionsforschungsprozess häufig impliziten Ideologieannahmen folge, die den abschließenden Evaluationsprozess zu einem pragmatischen Aussöhnen verschiedener Interessen machen. Dennoch handele es sich bei der Aktionsforschung um einen radikalen Ansatz empirischer Sozialwissenschaft, dessen Kern in der Aufhebung des scheinbaren Gegensatzes von wissenschaftlicher Wissensproduktion einerseits und politisch-eingreifendem Handeln andererseits bestehe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    So zum Beispiel: „An Action Program,“ 1945; Lewin 1946; Moreno 1934; Watson 1948; Carr und Kemmis 1986; Fals Borda und Rahman 1991; Gustavsen und Hunnius 1981; Herbst 1976; Pagès 1974; Trist 1963; Greenwood und Gonzalez Santos 1992; Gustavsen 1992; McNiff 1993; Naschold et al. 1993; Sagor 1992; Whyte 1991; Atweh et al. 1998; Emery und Purser 1996; Greenwood 1999; Gustavsen et al. 2001; McNiff und Whitehead 2000; Pålshaugen et al. 1998; Zuber-Skerritt 1996; Costello 2003, 2011; Fricke und Totterdill 2004; Kapoor und Jordan 2009; Kindon et al. 2007; Levin 2002; Reason und Bradbury 2001; Somekh 2006; Stringer 2007; Whitehead und McNiff 2006.

  2. 2.

    Detailliertere Lewin-Biograpfien finden sich in Marrow (1969) und Lück (2001).

  3. 3.

    Die aussagekräftigsten Beschreibungen finden sich bei Alex Bavelas, John French, und später Lester Coch (Bavelas und Lewin 1942; Coch und French Jr. 1948; French Jr. 1945; Marrow und French Jr. 1945) bzw. weit verteilt in den Publikationen Alfred Marrows (1964, 1967, 1969, 1972; Marrow et al. 1967).

  4. 4.

    Diese Regeln basieren auf dem Konzept der Deliberativen Demokratie, wie es zuerst in Bessette (1980) vorgestellt und dann unter anderem von Cohen (1989) und Habermas (1998) weiterentwickelt wurde. Siehe auch Steiner (2012). Für die Aktionsforschung stellt Gustavsen (1992, S. 3 f.) 13 Regeln für einen gelungenen Dialog auf.

Literatur

  • Ameln, F., Gerstmann, R., & Kramer, J. (2009). Psychodrama. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • An Action Program. (1945). Congress Weekly, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Announcement of the Opening of the Sociometric Institute. (1942). Sociometry, 5(2), i–lix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atweh, B., Kemmis, S., & Weeks, S. (1998). Action research in practice: Partnership for social justice in education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G., Dembo, T., & Lewin, K. (1943). Frustration and regression. In R. G. Barker, J. S. Kounin, & H. F. Wright (Hrsg.), Child behavior and development: A course of representative studies (S. 441–458). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, A., & Lewin, K. (1942). Training in democratic leadership. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 37(1), 115–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessette, J. M. (1980). Deliberative democracy: The majority principle in republican government. In R. A. Goldwin & W. A. Schambra (Hrsg.), How democratic is the constitution? (S. 102–116). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., & Tandon, R. (1983). Ideology and political economy in inquiry: Action research and participatory research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19, 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. F., Roosevelt, E., & Cohen, I. J. (2002). Confinement and ethnicity: An overview of world war II japanese american relocation sites. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellanet, C., & Jordan, C. (2002). Participatory action research in natural resource management: A critique of the method based on five years’ experience in the transamazonica region of brazil. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D., & Torbert, B. (2003). Transforming inquiry and action. Action Research, 1(2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coal Industry Nationalisation Act. (1946). 1946 Chapter 59 9 and 10 Geo 6. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/9-10/59.

  • Coch, L., & French, J. R. S, Jr. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1(4), 512–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberative democracy and democratic legitimacy. In A. S. Hamlin & S. Pettit (Hrsg.), The good polity: Normative analysis of the state (S. 17–34). Oxford: B. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J. (1945). United States Indian administration as a laboratory of ethnic relations. Social Research, 12(3), 265–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, S. J. M. (2003). Action research. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, S. J. M. (2011). Effective action research: Developing reflective thinking and practice. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elden, M. (1983). Democratization and participative research in developing local theory. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 4(1), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E. (1993 [1959]). Characteristics of socio-technical systems. In E. L. Trist & H. Murray (Hrsg.), The social engagement of social science: A tavistock anthology; originally published in tavistock document #527 (Bd. 3). London: The Tavistock Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, M. (1999). Searching: The theory and practice of making cultural change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, M., & Purser, R. E. (1996). The search conference: A powerful method for planning organizational change and community action (illustrated ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Thorsrud, E. (1976). International series on the quality of working life: Democracy at work: The report of the Norwegian industrial democracy program. Leiden: M. Nijhoff Social Sciences Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., Thorsrud, E., & Trist, E. L. (1969). Form and content in industrial democracy: Some experiences from Norway and other European countries. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals Borda, O. (1987). The application of participatory action-research in Latin America. International Sociology, 2(4), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fals Borda, O. (1991). Some basic ingredients. In M. Rahman & M. Fals Borda (Hrsg.), Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research (S. 3–12). New York: Apex.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fals Borda, O. (2006). The north-south convergence: A 30-year first-person assessment of PAR. Action Research, 4(3), 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fals Borda, O., & Rahman, M. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. New York: Apex.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, R. (1944). In memoriam: Fannie french morse: 1866–1944. Sociometry, 7(1), 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, S. (1996 [1970]). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, S. (2005 [1974]). Education for critical consciousness. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. S, Jr. (1945). Role-Playing as a method of training foremen. Sociometry, 8(3/4), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, W., & Totterdill, S. (2004). Action research in workplace innovation and regional development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A. (2010). Trauma in America. In E. Leveton (Hrsg.), Healing collective trauma with sociodrama and drama therapy (S. 3–24). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graebner, W. (1987). Confronting the democratic paradox: The ambivalent vision of Kurt Lewin. Journal of Social Issues, 43(3), 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. J. (1999). Action research: From practice to writing in an international action research development program. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D., & Gonzalez Santos, J. (1992). Industrial democracy as process: Participatory action in the fagor cooperative group of mondragon. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change (2. Aufl.). London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B. (1985). Workplace reform and democratic dialogue. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 6(4), 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B. (1992). Dialogue and development: Theory of communication, action research and the restructuring of working life. Maastricht: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B. (2003). New forms of knowledge production and the role of action research. Action Research, 1(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B. (2008). Action research, practical challenges and the formation of theory. Action Research, 6(4), 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B., & Engelstad, S. (1986). The design of conferences and the evolving role of democratic dialogue in changing working life. Human Relations, 39(2), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B., & Hunnius, G. (1981). New patterns of work reform: The case of Norway. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B., Finne, H., & Oscarsson, B. (2001). Creating connectedness: The role of social research in innovation policy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1978). Einige Schwierigkeiten beim Versuch, Theorie und Praxis zu vermitteln. In J. Habermas (Hrsg.), Theorie und Praxis: Sozialphilosophische Studien (S. 9–47). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, P. G. (1974). Socio-Technical design: Strategies in multidisciplinary research. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, S. G. (1976). Alternatives to hierarchies. Leiden: M. Nijhoff Social Sciences Division.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1953). Vorwort. In K. Lewin (Hrsg.), Die Lösung sozialer Konflikte. Bad Nauheim: Christian-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Council for the Quality of Working Life. (1979). Working on the quality of working life: Developments in Europe. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, A., & Lindhult, E. (2008). Emancipation or workability? Critical versus pragmatic scientific orientation in action research. Action Research, 6(1), 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S. (2009). From a methodology of the margins to neoliberal appropriation and beyond: The lineages of PAR. In D. Kapoor & S. Jordan (Hrsg.), Education, participatory action research, and social change: International perspectives (S. 15–28). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, I. (2002). The devil’s in the theory: A critical assessment of robert chambers’ work on participatory development. Third World Quarterly, 23(1), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D., & Jordan, S. (2009). Education, participatory action research, and social change: International perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jürgen Habermas. In S. Reason & H. Bradbury (Hrsg.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry & practice (S. 91–102). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2011). A self-reflective practitioner and a new definition of critical participatory action research. In N. Mockler & J. Sachs (Hrsg.), Rethinking educational practice through reflexive inquiry: Essays in honour of susan groundwater-smith (S. 11–29). Dordrecht: Springer Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin & Y. Linclon (Hrsg.), Handbook of qualitative research (3. Aufl., S. 559–603). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Routledge studies in human geography: Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M. (2002). Researching enterprise development: Action research on the cooperation between management and labour in Norway. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1916). Die psychische Tätigkeit bei der Hemmung von Willensvorgängen und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. Leipzig: Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1920). Die Sozialisierung des Taylorsystems. Eine grundsätzliche Untersuchung zur Arbeits- und Berufspsychologie. Praktischer Sozialismus, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1922a). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation, II. Psychologische Forschung, 2(1), 65–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1922b). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation I. Psychologische Forschung, 1, 191–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1931). The conflict between aristotelian and galileian modes of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 141–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1936a). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1936b). Some social-psychological differences between the United States and Germany. Journal of Personality, 4(4), 265–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1943a). Cultural reconstruction. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(2), 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1943b). Psychology and the process of group living. Journal of Social Psychology, 17(1), 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947a). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947b). Frontiers in group dynamics: II. Channels of group life, social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1999, orig. 1948). Group decision and social change. In M. Gold (Hrsg.), The complete social scientist: A Kurt Lewin reader (S. 265–284). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., & Lippitt, R. L. (1938). An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: A preliminary note. Sociometry, 1(3/4), 292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., & Rupp, H. (1928). Untersuchungen zur Textilindustrie II. Psychotechnische Zeitschrift, 3(2), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippitt, R. (1940). An experimental study of the effect of democratic and authoritarian group atmospheres. University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, 16(3), 7–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lück, H. (2001). Kurt Lewin - Eine Einführung in sein Werk. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykes, M. B., & Mallona, A. (2008). Towards transformational liberation: Participatory and action research and praxis. In S. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2. Aufl., S. 106–121). London: SAGE. http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-sage-handbook-of-action-research/d10.xml.

  • Marineau, R. F. (1989). Jacob levy moreno, 1889–1974: Father of psychodrama, sociometry, and group psychotherapy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, M. (1991). Methodik subjektwissenschaftlicher Forschung: Jenseits des Streits um quantitative und qualitative Verfahren. Hamburg: Argument Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, A. J. (1964). Risks and uncertainties in action research (Kurt Lewin memorial award address). Journal of Social Issues, 20(3), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, A. J. (1967). Events leading to the establishment of the national training laboratories. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 3(2), 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, A. J. (1969). The practical theorist: The life and work of Kurt Lewin. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, A. J. (1972). The failure of success. New York: Amacom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, A. J., & French, J. R. S, Jr. (1945). Changing a stereotype in industry. Journal of Social Issues, 1(3), 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrow, A. J., Bowers, D. G., & Seashore, S. E. (1967). Management by participation. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A. (2007). Participatory action research. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J. (1993). Teaching as learning: An action research approach. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2000). Action research in organisations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations (1. Aufl.). Washington, DC: Nervous and mental disease publishing co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1937). Sociometry in relation to other social sciences. Sociometry, 1(1/2), 206–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1940). A frame of reference for testing the social investigator. Sociometry, 3(4), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1949). Sociometry and marxism. Sociometry, 12(1/3), 106–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1955). Preludes to my autobiography: Introduction to who shall survive? New York: Beacon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1989a). The autobiography of J. L. Moreno, MD, part 1. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama & Sociometry, 42(1), 13–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1989b). The autobiography of J. L. Moreno, MD, part 2. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama & Sociometry, 42(2), 53–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L., & Fox, J. (1987). The essential moreno: Writings on psychodrama, group method, and spontaneity by J.L. Moreno. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L., & Jennings, H. H. (1938). Statistics of social configurations. Sociometry, 1(3/4), 342–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, H. (1978). Einige Aspekte der Aktionsforschung im internationalen Vergleich. In H. Moser & H. Ornauer (Hrsg.), Internationale Aspekte der Aktionsforschung (S. 173–189). München: Kösel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naschold, F., Cole, R. E., Gustavsen, B., & Beinum, H. (1993). Constructing the new industrial society. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagès, M. (1974). Das affektive Leben der Gruppen: Eine Theorie der menschlichen Beziehung. Stuttgart: Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pålshaugen, Ø., Gustavsen, B., Østerberg, D., & Shotter, J. (1998). Dialogues on work and innovation: The end of organization theory? Language as a tool in action research and organizational development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petzold, H. (1980a). Moreno – nicht Lewin – der Begründer der Aktionsforschung. Gruppendynamik, 11, 142–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petzold, H. G. (1980b). Moreno und Lewin und die Ursprünge der psychologischen Gruppenarbeit. Gruppenpädagogik, 6, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. (1991). The theoretical standpoint of PAR. In O. Fals Borda & M. A. Rahman (Hrsg.), Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research (S. 13–23). New York: Apex.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, S., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry & practice (1. Aufl.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagor, R. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somekh, B. (2006). Action research: A methodology for change and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, J. (2012). The foundations of deliberative democracy: Empirical research and normative implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steininger, R. (2003). South tyrol: A minority conflict of the twentieth century. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. (2007). Action research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L. (1963). Organizational choice: Capabilities of groups at the coal face under changing technologies: The loss, re-discovery & transformation of a work tradition. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L. (1981). The sociotechnical perspective: The evolution of sociotechnical systems as a conceptual framework and as an action research program. In A. H. van de Ven & W. F. Joyce (Hrsg.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior (S. 19–75). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L. (1993). Guilty of enthusiasm. In H. I. Ansoff & A. G. Bedeian (Hrsg.), Management laureates: A collection of autobiographical essays (Bd. 6, S. 193–221). Amsterdam: Jai Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E., & Bamforth, K. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting: An examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. L., & Murray, H. (1993). Historical overview: The foundation and development of the tavistock institute. In E. L. Trist, & H. Murray (Hrsg.), The social engagement of social science: A tavistock anthology (Vol. 3, S. 1–34). London: Tavistock Institute. http://moderntimesworkplace.com/archives/ericsess/sessvol2/sessvol2.html.

  • Watson, G. (1948). Action for unity. Jewish Affairs, 2(4), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. K., & Lippitt, R. (1960). Autocracy and democracy: An experimental inquiry. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action research living theory. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1996). New directions in action research. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 10827, Berlin, Deutschland

    Martin Dege

Authors
  1. Martin Dege
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Dege .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Denise Heseler

  2. Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Robin Iltzsche

  3. Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Olivier Rojon

  4. Institut für Soziologie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany

    Jonas Rüppel

  5. Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Tom David Uhlig

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dege, M. (2017). Aktionsforschung. In: Heseler, D., Iltzsche, R., Rojon, O., Rüppel, J., Uhlig, T. (eds) Perspektiven kritischer Psychologie und qualitativer Forschung. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14020-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14020-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14019-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14020-5

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation