Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behavioral Correlates of Statement Credibility: Theories, Paradigms, and Results

  • Chapter
Criminal Behavior and the Justice System

Part of the book series: Research in Criminology ((RESEARCH CRIM.))

Abstract

A central goal of each trial process is the reconstruction of past events. The available information, whether it be factual evidence or verbal statements of the accused or of eyewitnesses, has to be evaluated in the light of this basic task. In the case of factual evidence, the evaluation task is basically a question of interpretation of facts while the facts themselves are only seldom in question. Things are quite different, however, if the evaluation has to be based on witness statements. Witness statements cannot be taken at face value. There are, in fact, numerous factors which might lead to discrepancies between the actual course of past events and details of a statement. The degree of congruence between a statement and the original stimuli will be referred to as the reliability of that statement. The various reasons for unreliable witness accounts can be classified into two basically different groups of factors: First, witnesses, although trying to give a correct and complete report of an event or a precise description of a person, may be subject to unconscious and unintended errors, caused for example by simple forgetting, suboptimal perception conditions, misleading postevent information, or biased instructions (see, e.g., Clifford & Bull, 1978; Davies, Ellis, & Shepherd, 1981; Lloyd-Bostock & Clifford, 1983; Loftus, 1979; Shepherd, Ellis, & Davies, 1982; Wegener, Köhnken, & Steller, in press; Wells & Loftus, 1984, for reviews of this line of research). These factors affect an aspect of the reliability of a statement which will be referred to as the accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arntzen, E (1983). Psychologie der Zeugenaussage. Systematik der Glaubwürdigkeitsmerkmale. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Vol. 1 (pp. 119–160 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (Eds.). (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, B., & Bull, R. (1978). The psychology of person identification. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M. J., & O’Hair, H. D., (1983). Nonverbal communication and deception: differences in deception cues due to gender and communicator dominance. Communication Monographs, 50, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrow, R. J., Parks, A., Lucas, N., & Thomas, K. (1972). The objective use of multiple physiological indices in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 9, 578–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G.M., Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W. (Eds.). (1981). Perceiving and remembering faces. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbacher, K. A. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Jordan, A. (1982). Age changes in deceiving and detecting deceit. In R. S. Feldman (Ed.), Development of nonverbal behavior in children (pp. 151–180 ). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Ambivalence, discrepancy, and deception in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication (pp. 204–248 ). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B.M., Jordan, A., Irvine, A., & Laser, P. S. (1982). Age changes in the detection of deception. Child Development, 53, 701–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Lassiter, G. D., & Stone, J. I. (1982). Attentional determinants of success at detecting deception and truth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Rosenthal, R., Green, C. R., & Rosenkrantz, J. (1982). Diagnosing deceptive and mixed messages from verbal and nonverbal cues. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 18, 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Rosenthal, R., Rosenkrantz, J., & Green, C. R. (1982). Actual and perceived cues to deception: a closer look at speech. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B.M., Lanier, K., & Davis, T. (1983). Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1096–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. I., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985a). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 323–370 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B.M., Stone, J.I., & Lassiter, G.D. (1985b). Telling ingratiating lies: effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTurck, M.A., & Miller, G. R. (1985). Deception and arousal: isolating the behavioral correlates of deception. Human Communication Research, 12, 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. J. (1980). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 1–20 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1981). Mistakes when deceiving. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 364, 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32, 88–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1972). Hand movements. Journal of Communication, 22, 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 288–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Scherer, K. R. (1976). Body movement and voice pitch in deceptive interaction. Semiotica, 16, 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R. V., Thibaut, J., Hickey, C. B., & Gumpert, P. (1970). Visual interaction in relation to machiavellianism and an unethical act. In R. Christie & F. L. Geis (Eds.), Studies in machiavellianism (pp. 53–75 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. S. (1976). Nonverbal disclosure of teacher deception and interpersonal affect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 807–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. S., & White, J. B. (1980). Detecting deception in children. Journal of Communication, 30, 121–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. S., Devin-Sheehan, L., & Allen, V. L. (1978). Nonverbal cues as indicators of verbal dissembling. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman R. S., Jenkins, L., & Popoola, O. (1979). Detection of deception in adults and children via facial expressions. Child Development, 50, 350–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman-Eisler, E (1968). Psycholinguistics: experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., & Nakamura, G. V. (1982). The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 16 (pp. 60–109 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass, R.G. (1981). Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 141–172 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley, G. D. (1977). Experimental studies in the behavioral indicants of deception. Thesis, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley, G. D., & Doob, A. N. (1979). The detection of deception from nonverbal behaviors. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, J. E., & Leathers, D. G. (1980). Nonverbal indicators of deception: a new theoretical perspective. Communication Monographs, 47, 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvarth, F. (1984). Detecting deception in eyewitness cases: problems and prospects in the use of the polygraph. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 214–255 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G. (1982). Sprechverhalten und Glaubwürdigkeit: eine experimentelle Studie zur extralinguistischen und textstilistischen Aussageanalyse. Thesis, University of Kiel, FRG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G. (1984). Zum Beweiswert von Identifizierungen durch Augenzeugen: eine methodologische Analyse. Forensia, 5, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G. (1985). Speech and deception of eyewitnesses: an information processing approach. Proceedings of the XXIII International Congress of Psychology: Vol. 7 (pp. 117–139). Acapulco, 1984. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G. (1986). Verhaltenskorrelate von Täuschung und Wahrheit–neue Perspektiven in der Glaubwürdigkeitsdiagnostik. Psychologische Rundschau 37, 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements. Does it work? Social Behavior, 1, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G., & Steller, M. (1988). The evaluation of the credibility of child witness statements in the German procedural system. In G. Davies (Ed.), The child witness: Do the courts abuse children? Leicester, British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G., & Wegener, H. (1982). Zur Glaubwürdigkeit von Zeugenaussagen. Experimentelle Überprüfung ausgewählter Glaubwürdigkeitskriterien. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 29, 92–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M., Geller, V., & Olson, C. (1976). Modalities and cues in the detection of deception. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E. (1978). Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 380–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R.E. (1980). Humans as lie detectors: some second thoughts. Journal of Communication, 30, 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E., & Poe, D. (1980). On the line: the deception judgements of customs inspectors and laymen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 784–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlepage, G.E., & Pineault, M. A. (1981). Detection of truthful and deceptive interpersonal communications across information transmission modes. Journal of Social Psychology, 114, 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littlepage, G. E., McKinnie, R., & Pineault, M.A. (1983). Relationship between nonverbal sensitivities and detection of deception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57, 651–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littmann, E., & Szewczyk, H. (1983). Zu einigen Kriterien und Ergebnissen forensisch-psychologischer Glaubwürdigkeitsbegutachtung von sexuell mißbrauchten Kindern und Jugendlichen. Forensia, 4, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd-Bostock, S.M.A., & Clifford, B. R. (1983). Evaluating witness evidence: recent psychological research and new perspectives. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (Eds.). (1977). Personality at the crossroads: current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, R. S., & Devine, R G. (1984). Research on suggestion in lineups and photospreads. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: psychological perspectives (pp. 64–91 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, R. (1971). Nonverbal betrayal of feeling. Journal of Experimental Research on Personality 5, 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, J.K. (1981). Factors affecting assessments of witness credibility. In R. Bray & N. Kerr (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. R., Bauchner, J. E., Hocking, J. E., Fontes, N.E., Kaminski, E. R, & Brandt, D. R. (1981) “… And nothing but the truth”: How well can observers detect deceptive testimony? In B. D. Sales (Ed.) Perspectives in law and psychology: Vol. II. The trial process (pp. 145–179 ). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.R., Délùrck, M.A., & Kalbfleisch, P.J. (1983). Self-monitoring, rehearsal, and deceptive communication. Human Communication Research, 10, 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morency, N. L., & Krauss, R. M. (1982). The nonverbal encoding and decoding of affect in first and fifth graders. In R. S. Feldman (Ed.), Development of nonverbal behavioral skill (pp. 181–199 ). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion. Dubuque: Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitz, G. F., & Sachs, N. J. (1984). Judgment and decision: theory and application. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 139–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podlesny, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. (1977). Psychological measures in the detection of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 782–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B., & Day, J. D. (Eds.). (1985). The development of social cognition. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, D.C. (1982). The scientific basis of polygraph techniques and their use in the judicial process. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: the role of psychologists in criminal trial (pp. 317–371 ). Stockholm: Norstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1983). Individual differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 899–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1978). Personality inference from voice quality: the loud voice of extroversion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1982). Methods of research on vocal communication: paradigms and parameters. In K. R. Scherer & R Ekman (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 136–198 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1984). The nonverbal dimension: a fad, a field, or a behavioural modality? In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (pp. 160–183 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R., & Bergmann, G. (1984). Vocal communication. German Journal of Psychology, 8, 57–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, D., & Loftus, E. E. (1986). Qualities of the unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, J. W., Ellis, H.D., & Davies, G.M. (1982). Identification evidence: a psychological examination. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, S. J., & Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In R. S. Wyer & T.K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Vol. I (pp. 189–286 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steller, M. (1987). Psychophysiologische Aussagebeurteilung - wissenschaftliche Grundlagen and Anwendungen der Lügendetektion. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steller, M., & Köhnken, G. (1988). Statement analysis: credibility assessment of children’s testimonies in sexual abuse cases. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological techniques in law enforcement (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, G.M. (1984). Accuracy and confidence in testimony: a critical review and some fresh evidence. In D. J. Müller, D. E. Blackman, & A. T. Chapman (Eds.), Topics in psychology and the law (pp. 229–248 ). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1984). Proof of fact in criminal trials. Edinburgh: Green and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Undeutsch, U. (1967). Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen. In U. Undeutsch (Ed.), Handbuch der Psychologie: Vol 11. Forensische Psychologie (pp. 26–181 ). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past (pp. 27–56 ). Stockholm: Norstedt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Undeutsch, U. (1984). Courtroom evaluation of eyewitness testimony. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waid, W. M., & Orne, M. T. (1981). Cognitive, social and personality processes in the physiological detection of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 14 (pp. 61–106 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, H., Köhnken, G., & Steller, M. (in press). Forensische Aussagepsychologie Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., & Loftus, E. F. (Eds.). (1984). Eyewitness testimony: psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G.L., & Murray, D.M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 155–170 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1984). Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context. Psychological Review, 93, 322–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–147 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 14 (pp. 1–59 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Amidon, M. D., Bishop, S.E., & Pomerantz, S.D. (1982). Face and tone of voice in the communication of deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Driver, R., & Koestner, R. (1982). Discrepancy as a cue to actual and perceived deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7, 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Kernis, M. R., Driver, R., & Koestner, R. (1984). Segmentation of behavior: effects of actual deception and expected deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Alton, A. O. (1984). Learning to detect deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 519–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Colella, M. J. (1985). Learning to detect deception from three communication channels. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 188–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Günter Köhnken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychology, University of Kiel, New University, Building N 30, Olshausenstraße 40, 2300, Kiel, Germany

    Hermann Wegener

  2. Institute of Psychology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bismarckstraße 1, 8520, Erlangen, Germany

    Friedrich Lösel

  3. Department of General Medicine, University of Ulm, Am Hochstraäß 8, 7900, Ulm, Germany

    Jochen Haisch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Köhnken, G. (1989). Behavioral Correlates of Statement Credibility: Theories, Paradigms, and Results. In: Wegener, H., Lösel, F., Haisch, J. (eds) Criminal Behavior and the Justice System. Research in Criminology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86017-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86017-1_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-86019-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-86017-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation