Skip to main content
Log in

Learning to detect deception from three communication channels

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Lie Detection Test—a videotape of senders delivering truthful and deceptive messages—was administered to subjects via one of three channels: Face only, speech only, or face plus speech. Feedback information, identifying the messages as truthful or deceptive, was given to some subjects (learning condition) but not to others (control). It was found that subjects in the learning condition performed better overall relative to control subjects, regardless of the channel presented to them. In addition, however, accuracy of subjects in the learning condition improved progressively over the course of the test (relative to control), for the speech only and face plus speech channels but not for the face only channel. This effect was interpreted in terms of the limited number of deception cues offered by the face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. Nonverbal leakage and cues to deception.Psychiatry, 1969,32, 88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,29, 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L.Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. A single, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982,74, 166–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Amidon, M.D., Bishop, S.E., & Pomerantz, S.D. Face and tone of voice in the communication of deception.Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 1982,43, 347–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. The verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 14. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., & Alton, A.O. Learning to detect deception.Journal of Personality and Social PSychology, 1984,46, 519–528.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R. & Colella, M.J. Learning to detect deception from three communication channels. J Nonverbal Behav 9, 188–194 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000739

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000739

Keywords

Navigation