Skip to main content

Habituation and Sensitization of the Landing Response of Drosophila Melanogaster: II. Receptive Field Size of Habituating Units

  • Conference paper
Modulation of Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity in Nervous Systems

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASIH,volume 19))

Abstract

The landing response ofDrosophila can easily be elicited by visual stimuli. The response probability decreases with repeated stimulus presentation. The present paper shows that this habituation of the response occurs near to the level of the sensory input. The neurons habituating have relatively small receptive fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bausenwein B, Wolf R and Heisenberg M (1986) Genetic Dissection of Optomotor Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Studies on Wildtype and the Mutantoptomotor-blind H31. J. Neurogenetics 3, 87–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borst A and Bahde S (1987) Comparison between the Movement Detection System Underlying the Optomotor and the Landing Response in the Housefly. Biol.Cybem. 56. 217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner E (1976) Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol. Cybernet. 24, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner E, Buchner S, Bülthoff I (1984) Deoxyglucose mapping of nervous activity induced in Drosophila brain by visual movement Part I. Wildtype. J.Comp.Physiol. (A) 155, 471–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner E, Götz K G, Straub C (1978) Elementary Movement Detectors for Vertical Movement in the Visual System of Drosophila. Biol. Cybern, 31, 235–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bülthoff I and Buchner E (1985) Deoxyglucose mapping of nervous activity induced in Drosophila brain by visual movement. II. optomotor blind H31 and lobulaplate-less N684, visual mutants. J. Comp. Physiol (A) 156, 25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Ortega, J and Strausfeld, N J (1972) Columns and layers in the second synaptic region of the fly’s visual system. The case for two superimposed neuronal architectures. In Information processing in the visual system of arthropods. Ed. R Wehner. Springer Verlag. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Duerr J S and Quinn W G (1982) Three Drosophila mutations that block associative learning also affect habituation and sensitization. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci. USA 79, 3646–3650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson E S (1984) Vector analysis in a neural network. J. Insect Physiol. 30, 363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach K F (1981) Habituation and sensitization of the landing response of Drosophila melanogaster. Naturwissenschaften 68, 332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach, KF (1983) Neurogenetic am Beispiel des visuellen Systems von Drosophila melanogaster.Habilitation Thesis, Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach, K F and Heisenberg, M (1984) Neurogenetics and Behaviour in Insects. J. Exp.Biol. 112, 65–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz K G and Wenking H (1973) Visual control of locomotion in the walking fruitfly Drosophila. J. Comp. Physiol. 85, 235–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K (1984) The Lobula Complex of the Fly: Structure, Function and Significance in Visual Behaviour, in: Photoreception and Vision in Invertebrates Ed. MA Ali Plenum,New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg M and Buchner E (1977) The role of retinula cell types in visual behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. 117, 127–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg M and Wolf R (1984) Vision in Drosophila. Springer Verlag Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg M, Wonneberger R, and Wolf R (1978) Optomotorblind H31 - a Drosophila mutant of the lobula plate giant neurons. J. Comp. Physiol. 124, 287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengstenberg R (1982) Common Visual Response Properties of Giant Vertical Cells in the Lobula Plate of the BlowflyCalliphora. J. Comp.Physiol. (A) 149, 179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob K G, Willmund R, Folkers E, Fischbach KF, and Spatz HCh (1977) T-maze phototaxis of Drosophila melanogaster and several mutants in the visual systems. J. Comp. Physiol. 116, 209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel E R (1976) Cellular basis of behavior. An introduction to behavioral neurobiology. WH Freeman and Company San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel E R (1981) Behavioral Biology of Aplysia. W.H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddess T and Laughlin SB (1985) Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency. Proc.R.Soc.Lond B 225, 251–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowell C H F and H Reichert (1986) Three descending interneurons reporting deviation from course in the locust II. Physiology. J. Comp. Physiol. (A) 158, 775–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruyter van Steveninck R R de, Zaagman W H and Mastebroek HAK (1986) Adaptation of transient responses of a movement sensitive neuron in the visual system of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala. Biol. Cybern. 53, 451–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw S R (1981) Anatomy and physiology of identified non-spiking cells in the photoreceptor-lamina complex of the compound eye of insects especially Diptera. In Neurones without impulses (Ed. A Roberts and BMH Bush). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea M and Rowell C H F (1976) The neuronal basis of a sensory Analyser, the Acridic Movement Detector System II. Response Decrement, Convergence, and the Nature of the Excitatory Afferents to the Fan-like Dendrites of the LGMD. J.Exp. Biol. 65, 289–308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittekind W (1987) Analyse des stereotypen und insbesondere plastischen Landeverhaltens von Drosophila melanogaster. Dissertation. Universität Freiburg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fischbach, KF., Bausenwein, B. (1988). Habituation and Sensitization of the Landing Response of Drosophila Melanogaster: II. Receptive Field Size of Habituating Units. In: Hertting, G., Spatz, HC. (eds) Modulation of Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity in Nervous Systems. NATO ASI Series, vol 19. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73160-0_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73160-0_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73162-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73160-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics