Zusammenfassung
Es liegen zwei Hauptansätze zur Bestimmung akzeptabler Risiken vor. Der von Starr (1969) verbreitete Ansatz der „Revealed Preferences- („revealed preference approach“) benützt die Analyse vergangenen Verhaltens gegenüber Risiko zur Begründung zukünftiger Entscheidungen. Der andere Ansatz verwendet psychometrische Methoden, um festzustellen, welche Risiken von der Bevölkerung bewußt als akzeptabel gesehen werden (Fischhoff, Slovic, Lichtenstein, Combs, 1978; Green, Brown, 1978a; Svenson, 1967; Slovic, Fischhoff, Lichtenstein, 1979; Green, 1979d).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Brown, R. A.; Green, C. H. (1979): Precepts of Safety Assessment. Journal of the Operational Research Society.
Fischhoff, B.; Slovic, P.; Lichtenstein, S.; Combs, B. (1978): How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits. Policy Sciences 9, 127–152.
Green, C. H. (1974): Measures of Safety. Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois. Urbana.
Green, C. H. (1977): Measuring Human Life Safety. In: Rüssel, J. A. (Ed.): Behavioral Basis of Design. Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchins and Ross.
Green, C. H. (1979a): Risk: Attitudes and Beliefs. In: Canter, D. V. (Ed.): Behaviour in Fires. New York: Wiley.
Green, C. H. (1979b): Someone out there is trying to kill me: Acceptable Risk as a Problem Definition. International Conference on Environmental Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford.
Green, C. H. (1979c): Risk: Beliefs and Attitudes in Regard to Major Hazards. Regional Studies Association Symposium über Entwicklung der Petrochemie. Dundee.
Green, C. H. (1979d): Public Perceptions of Risk. Symposium über „Acceptability of Risk“. UMIST, Manchester.
Green, C. H.; Brown, R. A. (1977): Hazards. Brief an New Scientist 74 (1056), 667–668.
Green, C. H.; Brown, R. A. (1978 a): Counting Lives. Journal of Occupational Accidents 2, 55–70.
Green, C. H.; Brown, R. A. (1978b): Life Safety: what is it and how much is it worth? Current Paper 52/78, Building Research Establishment, Garston.
Green, C. H.; Brown, R. A. (1978c): The Dimbleby Lecture. Brief an The Listener 100 (1589), 759.
Jones-Lee, M. (1969): Valutation of Reduction in Probability of Death by Road Accident. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 37–67.
Kietz, T. A. (1971): Hazard Analysis-A Quantitative Approach to Safety, Symposium Series No. 34, London: Institute of Chemical Engineers.
Linnerooth, J. (1978): Revaluating the Value of Life: Theoretical Considerations. Joint Operations Research Society of America Institute of Management Sciences Conference, Los Angeles.
Lowrance, W. W. (1976): Of Acceptable Risk. Los Altos: Kaufmann.
McClelland, G.; Rohrbaugh, J. (1978): Who Accepts the Pareto Axiom? The Role of Utility and Equity in Arbitration Decisions. Behavioral Science 23, 446–456.
Mishan, E. J. (1971): Evaluation of Life and Limb: A Theoretical Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 79 (4), 687–705.
Rittel, H.; Webber, M. M. (1973): Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4, 155–169.
Rowe, W. D. (1977): An Anatomy of Risk, New York: Wiley.
Slovic, P.; Fischhoff, B.; Lichtenstein, S. (1979): Perceived Risk. Environment 21 (3), 14–20 u. s.
Starr, C. (1969): Social Benefit vs Technological Risk. Science 165, 1232–1238.
Starr, C.; Rudman, R.; Whipple, C. (1976): Philosophical Basis for Risk Analysis. Annual Review of Energy 1, 629–662.
Svenson, O. (1976): Experienced Risk of Death as a Function of How the Risk is Presented. Working Paper No. 1, Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Green, C.H. (1983). Die „Revealed Preferences“-Theorie: Annahmen und Mutmaßungen. In: Conard, J. (eds) Gesellschaft, Technik und Risikopolitik. BMFT — Risiko- und Sicherheitsforschung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68743-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68743-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-68744-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-68743-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive