Abstract
Research on human cytogenetics began with the work of Arnold (1879) and Fleming (1882) who for the first time examined human mitotic chromosomes. The detailed study of human chromosome morphology began 1956 after Tijo and Levan improved the technique of squash preparation using hypotonic shock and added colchicine to arrest cells in metaphase in order to increase the number of countable cells (Vogel and Motulsky, 1986). In their now classic article they reported that the human chromosome number was 46 and not 48 as was believed from earlier reports. Their work was confirmed in the same year by Ford and Hamerton (1956). The two articles stimulated a renewed interest in human cytogenetics and soon several laboratories were engaged in the study of human chromosomes and a variety of classification and nomenclature systems were proposed. This resulted in confusion in the literature and a need to establish a common system of nomenclature that would improve communication between workers in the field (Harnden, 1985). 1960 “A proposed standard system of nomenclature of human mitotic chromosomes“ was reported by a study-group which convened in Denver, Colorado. This report, more usually known as the Denver Conference (1960), has formed the basis for all subsequent nomenclature reports. The present human chromosome nomenclature (ISCN 1995) is based on the results of the following international conferences: Denver 1960, London 1963, Chicago 1966, Paris 1971, Paris 1975, Stockholm 1977, Paris 1981, Memphis 1994.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold J (1879) Beobachtungen über Kernteilungen in den Zellen der Geschwülste. Virchows Arch (Pathol Anat) 78:279
Chicago Conference (1966): Standardization in Human Cytogenetics. Birth Defects: Original Article Series, Vol 2, No 2 (The National Foundation, New York 1966).
Chromosome analysis guidelines — preliminary report (1990) Developed by The Association of Cytogenetic Technologists Task Force: Knutsen T, Bixenman HA, Lawce H, Martin PK. Cytogenet Cell Genet 44:1–4
Claussen U, Schäfer H, and Trampisch HJ (1984) Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 67:23–28
Claussen U, Kleider W, Müller HG, Wille N, Baumann HA (1992) Quality control in routine chromosome analysis: prediction of total number of bands for the individual case analyzed. Clin Genet 41:100–104
Denver Conference (1960): A proposed standard system of nomenclature of human mitotic chromosomes. Lancet i:1063–1065 (1960)
Feeny D, Tomkins DJ (1981) Letter to the Editor: The Usefulness of Chromosome Banding in Pre-and Postnatal Service Cytogenetics: A Reconsideration. Am J Med Genet 9:79–87
Flemming W (1897) Über die Chromosomenzahl beim Menschen. Anat Anz 14:171
Ford CE, Hamerton JL (1956): The chromosomes of man. Nature 178:1020–1023
Harnden DG (1985) Historical Introduction. In: ISCN (1985):An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature, Harnden DG, Klinger HP (eds), Birth Defects: Original Article Series, Vol 21, 1 (March of Dimes Birth defects Foundation, New York 1985)
Hook EB (1977) Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: Tables of 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. Am J Hum Genet 29:94–97
Hook EB, Healy NP, Willey AM (1989) How much difference does chromosome banding make? Adjustment in prevalence and mutation rates of human structural cytogenetic abnormalities. Ann Hum Genet 53:237–242
ISCN (1995): An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature, Mitelman F (ed); S. Karger, Basel, 1995
Jacobs, PA, Browne C, Gregson N, Joyce CH, White H (1992) Estimates of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities detectable in unselected newborns using moderate levels of banding. J Med Genet 29:103–108
London Conference on the Normal Human Karyotype. Cytogenetics 2:264–268 (1963)
Paris Conference (1971): Standardization in Human Cytogenetics. Birth Defects: Original Article Series, Vol 8, No 7 (The National Foundation, New York 1972); also in Cytogenetics 11:313–362 (1972)
Tjio JH, Levan A (1956) The chromosome number of man. Hereditas 42:1–16
United Kingdom External Quality Assessment Scheme. Slide Assessment Scoring Guide. Edinburgh. ACC Clin Cytogenet Bull 1988 2:35–26
Vogel F, Motulsky AG (1986) History and Development of Human Cytogenetics. In: Vogel F, Motulsky AG (eds) Human Genetics. Problems and Approaches. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo pp 20–24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Held, K. (1999). Karyotyping and Data Interpretation. In: Wegner, RD. (eds) Diagnostic Cytogenetics. Springer Lab Manual. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59918-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59918-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-47813-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59918-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive