Summary
For use in prenatal diagnosis, tables were prepared giving the number of metaphases or clones, respectively, which must be analysed in order to detect fetal mosaicism of a given degree (=percentage of the aberrant cell population) or higher with at least 95% or 99% probability. Different tables are provided for the two techniques of chromosomal preparation: the colony method and the flask method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bochkov NP, Kuleshov NP, Chebotarev AN, Alekhin VI, Midian SA (1974) Population cytogenetic investigation of newborn in Moscow. Humangenetik 22:139–152
Claussen U (1980) The pipette method: A new rapid technique for chromosome analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 54: 277–278
Claussen U, Stutz R, Schmidt M (1984) The pipette method. (in preparation)
Hook EB (1977) Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: Tables of 90%, 95%, and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. Am J Hum Genet 29:94–97
Knörr-Gärtner H, Härle I (1972) A modified method of culturing amniotic fluid cells for prenatal detection of genetic disorders. Humangenetik 14:333–334
Paton GR, Silver MF, Allison AC (1974) Comparison of cell cycle time in normal and trisomic cells. Humangenetik 23:173–182
Schmid W (1975) Pranatale genetische Diagnostik. Eine Standort-bestimmung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Züricher Erfahrungen. Schweiz Rdsch Med 64:612–619
Schmid W (1977) Cytogenetical problems in prenatal diagnosis. Hereditas 86:37–44
Therkelsen AJ (1979) Cell-culture and cytogenetic techniques. In: Murken JD, Stengel-Rutkowski S, Schwinger E (eds) Prenatal diagnosis. F Enke Publ Stuttgart, pp 258–275
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Claussen, U., Schäfer, H. & Trampisch, H.J. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 67, 23–28 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270553
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270553