Abstract
The problem of model choice in multiobjective decision making, that is, the selection of the appropriate multiobjective solution technique to solve an arbitrary multiobjective decision problem, is considered. Classifications of the available techniques are discussed, leading to the development of a set of 28 model choice criteria and an algorithm for model choice. This algorithm divides the criteria into four groups, only one of which must be reevaluated for each decision problem encountered. Through the evaluation of the available multiobjective techniques with respect to each of the model choice criteria, the model choice problem itself is modeled as a multicriterion decision problem. Compromise programming is then used to select the appropriate technique for implementation. The case study presented is a structural design problem where a pre-defined set of alternatives is to be ranked with respect to a set of criteria. Using the model choice algorithm, an appropriate multiobjective solution technique is selected.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gershon, M. (1981). Model choice in multiobjective decision making in water and mineral resource systems, Natural Resource Systems Technical Report Series #37, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Khairullah, Z. and S. Zionts (1979). An experiment with some approaches for solving problems with multiple criteria, 3rd Int’l. Conf. on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Konigswinter, Germany, August 20–24.
Despontin, M. and J. Spronk (1979). Comparison and evaluation of multicriteria decision models, Report No. 79231A, Center for Research in Business Economics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
Duckstein, L. (1978). Imbedding uncertainties into multiobjective decision models in water resources, Keynote paper, Session Ti, Int’l. Symp. on Risk and Reliability in Water Res., June 26–28, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Available as paper #78–21, Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Starr, M. and M. Zeleny (1977). MCDM-State and future of the arts, in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, North Holland and Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
Kisiel, C. and L. Duckstein (1972). General report on model choice and validation, Proceedings, Int’l. Symp. on Uncertainties in Hydrologic and Water Resource Systems, Vol. III, pp. 1282–1308, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Kazanowski, A. D. (1968). A standardized approach to cost-effectiveness evaluation, in Cost-Effectiveness: The Economic Evaluation of Engineered Systems, J. English, ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 113–150.
Goicoechea, A., D. Hansen and L. Duckstein (1982). Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business:Applications, Wiley and Sons, New York, New York.
Duckstein, L. (1981). Multiobjective optimization in structural design: the model choice, problem, Proceedings,Intl’1 Symp. on Optimum Structural Design, Oct. 19–22, Tucson, pp. 10–1 to 10–4, available as working paper #82–13, Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gershon, M., Duckstein, L. (1983). An Algorithm for Choosing of a Multiobjective Technique. In: Hansen, P. (eds) Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 209. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46473-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46473-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-11991-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-46473-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive