Skip to main content

Generation and Assessment of VMF1-Type Grids Using North-American Numerical Weather Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Earth on the Edge: Science for a Sustainable Planet

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 139))

Abstract

Numerical weather models (NWM) have become an important source of atmospheric data for modeling error sources in geodetic positioning. One example of this is the development of the Vienna Mapping Functions (VMF1) and ray-traced zenith delays which are derived from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) datasets. These products are provided on an operational basis through the GGOS Atmosphere project. In general, relatively little consideration has been given to the choice of NWM on the derived mapping functions and zenith delay products. In this investigation we compare the gridded-VMF1 mapping functions and ray-traced zenith delays derived from the ECMWF to equivalent products derived by ray-tracing through the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Reanalysis model. We have chosen to compare the gridded version of these products as they are available for any location on Earth, rather than only specific stations and have been shown to be essentially equivalent in terms of accuracy. This paper also includes a discussion about a systematic production of gridded-VMF1 and ray-traced zenith delays derived from the NCEP datasets (and from the Canadian Meteorological Center GEM model) on an operational basis. The benefits of the service would include: (1) a backup in the event of the ECMWF VMF1 or zenith delays being unavailable; (2) greater compatibility with other NWM derived corrections, such as atmospheric pressure loading and; (3) the availability of tropospheric delay products derived from an independent source and ray-tracing algorithms should provide more robustness for combination products which use these models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boehm J, van Dam T (2009) Modeling deficiencies and modeling based on external data. In: Second GGOS unified analysis workshop, IERS, Grand Hyatt, 11–12 December (oral presentation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm J, Niell AE, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006a) Global Mapping Function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07304. doi:10.1029/2005GL025546

  • Boehm J, Werl B, Schuh H (2006b) Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European Centre for medium-range weather forecasts operational analysis data. J Geophys Res 111:B02406. doi:10.1029/2005JB003629

  • Boehm J, Kouba J, Schuh H (2008) Forecast Vienna mapping functions 1 for realtime analysis of space geodetic observations. J Geodesy 83(5):397–401. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0216-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS Service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geodesy 83:191–198. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0300-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fund F, Morel L, Mocquet A (2009) Discussion and recommendations about the height correction for a priori zenith hydrostatic delays derived from ECMWF data [on-line]. www.hg.tuwien.ac.at/~ecmwf1/Reducing_ECMWF_ZHDs.pdf

  • Herring TA (1992) Modelling atmospheric delays in the analysis of space geodetic data. In: de Munck JC, Th Spoelstra TA (eds) Proceedings of the symposium refraction of transatmospheric signals in Geodesy, No. 36, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, The Hague, 19–22 May, pp. 157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J (2008) Implementation and testing of the gridded Vienna Mapping Function 1 (VMF1). J Geodesy 82(4):193–205. doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0170-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marini JW (1972) Correction of satellite tracking data for an arbitrary tropospheric profile. Radio Sci 7(2):223–231. doi:10.1029/RS007i002p00223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niell AE (1996) Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths. J Geophys Res 101(B2):3227–3246. doi:10.1029/95JB03048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nievinski FG (2009) Ray-tracing options to mitigate the neutral atmosphere delay in GPS. M.Sc.E. Thesis, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering technical report no. 262, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, 232 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nievinski FG, Santos MC (2010) Ray-tracing options to mitigate the neutral atmosphere delay in GPS. Geomatica 64(2):191–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit G, Luzum B (eds) (2010) IERS conventions (2010) (IERS technical note; 36). Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, 179 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen J (1972) Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging of satellites. In: Henriksen SW, Mancini A, Chovitz BH (eds) The use of artificial satellites for Geodesy, vol. 15 of Geophysical monograph series. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 247–251. ISBN 0-87590-015-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Teke K, Böhm J, Nilsson T, Schuh H, Steigenberger P, Dach R, Heinkelmann R, Willis P, Haas R, García-Espada S, Hobiger T, Ichikawa R, Shimizu S (2011) Multi-technique comparison of troposphere zenith delays and gradients during CONT08. J Geodesy 85(7):395–413. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0434-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesmer V, Boehm J, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H (2007) Effect of different tropospheric mapping functions on the TRF, CRF and position time-series estimated from VLBI. J Geodesy 81:409–421. doi:10.1007/s00190-006-0126-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart L (2010) Assessment of tropospheric slant factor models: comparison with three dimensional ray-tracing and impact of geodetic positioning. M.Sc.E thesis, Dept of Geodesy and geomatics Engineering technical report 275, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, 166 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Matthias Madzak (TU Vienna) for processing the VLBI results, the weather agencies (ECMWF, NCEP and CMC) for providing access to the NWM data, and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, project P20902) for funding the research. Dow et al. 2009 is kindly acknowledged for the IGS products

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo C. Santos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Urquhart, L., Santos, M.C., Nievinski, F.G., Böhm, J. (2014). Generation and Assessment of VMF1-Type Grids Using North-American Numerical Weather Models. In: Rizos, C., Willis, P. (eds) Earth on the Edge: Science for a Sustainable Planet. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 139. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37222-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics