Abstract
This paper compares estimated terrestrial reference frames (TRF) and celestial reference frames (CRF) as well as position time-series in terms of systematic differences, scale, annual signals and station position repeatabilities using four different tropospheric mapping functions (MF): The NMF (Niell Mapping Function) and the recently developed GMF (Global Mapping Function) consist of easy-to-handle stand-alone formulae, whereas the IMF (Isobaric Mapping Function) and the VMF1 (Vienna Mapping Function 1) are determined from numerical weather models. All computations were performed at the Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut (DGFI) using the OCCAM 6.1 and DOGS-CS software packages for Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) data from 1984 until 2005. While it turned out that CRF estimates only slightly depend on the MF used, showing small systematic effects up to 0.025 mas, some station heights of the computed TRF change by up to 13 mm. The best agreement was achieved for the VMF1 and GMF results concerning the TRFs, and for the VMF1 and IMF results concerning scale variations and position time-series. The amplitudes of the annual periodical signals in the time-series of estimated heights differ by up to 5 mm. The best precision in terms of station height repeatability is found for the VMF1, which is 5–7% better than for the other MFs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altamimi Z, Sillard P, Boucher C (2002) ITRF2000: a new release of the international terrestrial reference frame for earth science applications. J Geophys Res 107(B10):2214. DOI: 10.1029/2001JN000561
Angermann D, Drewes H, Krügel M, Meisel B, Gerstl M, Kelm R, Müller H, Seemüller W, Tesmer V (2004) ITRS combination center at DGFI—a terrestrial reference frame realisation 2003. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission Reihe B Nr. 313, München
Boehm J, Werl B, Schuh H (2006a) Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European centre for medium-range weather forecasts operational analysis data. J Geophys Res 111(B2):B02406. DOI: 10.1029/2005JB003629
Boehm J, Niell A, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006b) The global mapping function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on data from numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07304. DOI: 10.129/2005GL025546
Boehm J, Mendes-Cerveira PJ, Schuh H, Tregoning P (2006c) The impact of mapping functions for the neutral atmosphere based on numerical weather models in GPS data analysis. In: IAG General Assembly, Cairns, Australia, Springer (in press)
Davis J, Herring T, Shapiro I, Rogers A, Elgered G (1985) Geodesy by radio interferometry: effects of atmospheric modelling errors on the estimates of baseline lengths. Radio Sci 20(6):1593–1607
Feissel-Vernier M (2003) Selecting stable extragalactic compact radio sources from the permanent astrogeodetic VLBI program. Astron Astrophys 403:105–110
IERS (1999) First extension of the ICRF, ICRF-Ext.1. In: Gambis D (ed) 1998 IERS annual report, chapter VI. Observatoire de Paris, pp 87–114
Ma C, Arias F, Eubanks M, Fey A, Gontier A-M, Jacobs C, Sovers OJ, Archinal B, Charlot P (1998) The international celestial reference frame as realised by very long baseline interferometry. Astron J 166:516–546
MacMillan D (1995) Atmospheric gradients from very long baseline interferometry observations. Geophys Res Lett 22(9):1041–1044
MacMillan D, Ma C (1994) Evaluation of very long baseline interferometry modeling improvements. J Geophys Res 99(B01):637–651
MacMillan D, Ma C (1997) Atmospheric gradients and the VLBI terrestrial and celestial references frames. Geophys Res Lett 24(4):453–456
Niell A (1996) Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelength. J Geophys Res 101(B2):3227–3246
Niell A (2001) Preliminary evaluation of atmospheric mapping functions based on numerical weather models. Phys Chem Earth 26(6–8):476–480
Niell A (2006) Interaction of atmosphere modeling and analysis strategy. In: Behrend D, Baver K (eds) IVS 2006 general meeting proceedings (in press)
Nothnagel A, Pilhatsch M, Haas R (1995) Investigations of thermal height changes of geodetic VLBI telescopes. In: Lanotte R, Bianco G (eds) Proceedings of the 10th working meeting on European VLBI for geodesy and astrometry. Matera, Agenzia Spatiale Italiana, pp 121–133
Petrov L, Boy JP (2004) Study of the atmospheric pressure loading signals in very long baseline interferometry observations. J Geophys Res 109:B03405. DOI: 10.1029/2003JB002500
Rothacher M (2002) Estimation of station heights with GPS. In: Drewes H, Dodson A, Fortes L, Sanchez L, Sandroval P (eds) International association of geodesy symposia: vertical reference systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 81–90
Saastamoinen J (1973) Contribution to the theory of atmospheric refraction. Bull Géod 105:279–298, 106:383–397, 107: 13–34
Tesmer V, Kutterer H, Drewes H (2004) Simultaneous estimation of a TRF, the EOP and a CRF. In: Vandenberg N, Baver K (eds) IVS 2004 general meeting proceedings. NASA/CP-2004–212255, pp 311–314
Tesmer V, Boehm J, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H (2006) Impact of analysis options on the TRF, CRF and position time series estimated from VLBI. In: Behrend D, Baver K (eds) IVS 2006 general meeting proceedings. NASA/CP-2006–214140, pp 243–251
Titov O, Tesmer V, Boehm J (2004) OCCAM v.6.0 software for VLBI data analysis. In: Vandenberg N, Baver K (eds) IVS 2004 general meeting proceedings. NASA/CP-2004–212255, pp 267–271
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tesmer, V., Boehm, J., Heinkelmann, R. et al. Effect of different tropospheric mapping functions on the TRF, CRF and position time-series estimated from VLBI. J Geod 81, 409–421 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0126-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0126-9