Abstract
Previous research demonstrates that multiple representations of learning content can enhance students’ learning, but also that students learn deeply from multiple representations only if the learning environment supports them in making connections between the representations. We hypothesized that connection-making support is most effective if it helps students make sense of the content across representations and in becoming fluent in making connections. We tested this hypothesis in a classroom experiment with 599 4th- and 5th-grade students using an ITS for fractions. The experiment further contrasted two forms of support for sense making: auto-linked representations and the use of worked examples involving one representation to guide work with another. Results confirm our main hypothesis: A combination of worked examples and fluency support lead to more robust learning than versions of the ITS without connection-making support. Therefore, combining different types of connection-making support is crucial in promoting students’ deep learning from multiple representations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Suh, J., Moyer, P.S.: Developing Students’ Representational Fluency Using Virtual and Physical Algebra Balances. Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 26, 155–173 (2007)
Ainsworth, S.: DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 16, 183–198 (2006)
Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N.: Intelligent tutoring systems with multiple representations and self-explanation prompts support learning of fractions. In: 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 441–448. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)
Bodemer, D., et al.: Supporting learning with interactive multimedia through active integration of representations. Instructional Science 33, 73–95 (2005)
van der Meij, J., de Jong, T.: Supporting Students’ Learning with Multiple Representations in a Dynamic Simulation-Based Learning Environment. Learning and Instruction 16, 199–212 (2006)
Rau, M.A., et al.: How to schedule multiple graphical representations? A classroom experiment with an intelligent tutoring system for fractions. In: To appear in the Proceedings of ICLS 2012 (accepted, 2012)
Bodemer, D., et al.: The Active Integration of Information during Learning with Dynamic and Interactive Visualisations. Learning and Instruction 14, 325–341 (2004)
National Mathematics Advisory Panel: Foundations for Success: Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Board Panel, U.S. Government Printing Office (2008)
Charalambous, C.Y., Pitta-Pantazi, D.: Drawing on a Theoretical Model to Study Students’ Understandings of Fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics 64, 293–316 (2007)
Siegler, R.S., et al.: Developing effective fractions instruction: A practice guide. In: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. IES, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC (2010)
Koedinger, K.R., et al.: Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning. Cognitive Science (in press)
Seufert, T., Brünken, R.: Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20, 321–331 (2006)
Bodemer, D., Faust, U.: External and mental referencing of multiple representations. Computers in Human Behavior 22, 27–42 (2006)
Renkl, A.: The worked-out example principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 229–246. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Salden, R.J.C.M., Koedinger, K.R., Renkl, A., Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M.: Accounting for beneficial effects of worked examples in tutored problem solving. Educational Psychology Review 22, 379–392 (2010)
Berthold, K., Eysink, T., Renkl, A.: Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science 37, 345–363 (2009)
Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.: Cognitive Tutors: Technology Bringing Learning Sciences to the Classroom. In: Sawyer, R.K. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 61–77. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)
Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.: Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)
Rittle-Johnson, B., Koedinger, K.R.: Designing Knowledge Scaffolds to Support Mathematical Problem Solving. Cognition and Instruction 23, 313–349 (2005)
Aleven, V., et al.: A new paradigm for intelligent tutoring systems: Example-tracing tutors. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 19, 105–154 (2009)
Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S.: Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., Rohrbach, S. (2012). Sense Making Alone Doesn’t Do It: Fluency Matters Too! ITS Support for Robust Learning with Multiple Representations. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7315. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30949-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30950-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)