Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uterine Fehlbildungen

  • Chapter
Reproduktionsmedizin

Zusammenfassung

Uterine Fehlbildungen haben in der weiblichen Bevölkerung eine Prävalenz von 2–5%. Diese liegt bei Kinderwunschpatientinnen, insbesondere bei Patientinnen mit habituellen Aborten, deutlich höher (Saravelos et al. 2008; ◘ Tab. 33.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Akar ME, Bayar D, Yildiz S, Ozel M, Yilmaz Z (2005) Reproductive outcome of women with unicornuate uterus. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45: 148–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alborzi S, Asadi N, Zolghadri J, Alborzi S, Alborzi M (2009) Laparoscopic metroplasty in bicornuate and didelphic uteri. Fertil Steril 92: 352–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Fertility Society – AFS (1988) The American Fertility Society classification of adnexal adhaesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhaesions. Fertil Steril 49: 944–955

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell NF, Domingo J (2002) Uterine rupture at term after uncomplicated hysteroscopic metroplasty. Obstet Gynecol 100: 1089–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelman Z, Hazan Y, Hagay Z (2003) High prevalence of müllerian anomalies diagnosed by ultrasound in women with polycystic ovaries. J Reprod Med 48: 362–364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aubriot FX, Chapron C (2007) Diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero. Polemics about metroplasty. The pros. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35: 826–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkkanoglu M, Isikoglu M, Arici F, Ozgur K (2008) What is the best time to perform intracytoplasmic sperm injection/embryo transfer cycle after hysteroscopic surgery for an incomplete uterine septum? Fertil Steril 90: 2112–2115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braun P, Grau FV, Pons RM, Enguix DP (2005) Is hysterosalpingography able to diagnose all uterine malformations correctly? A retrospective study. Eur J Radiol 53: 274–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brucker SY, Gegusch M, Zubke W, Rall K, Gauwerky JF, Wallwiener D (2008) Neovagina creation in vaginal agenesis: development of a new laparoscopic Vecchietti-based procedure and optimized instruments in a prospective comparative interventional study in 101 patients. Fertil Steril 90: 1940–1952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe – DGGG (2010) Weibliche genitale Fehlbildungen. in: Leitlinien der Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Band I, Verlag S. Kramarz, Berlin, S. 31–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayez JA (1986) Comparison between abdominal and hysteroscopic metroplasty. Obstet Gynecol 68: 399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P (2001) Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 7: 161–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grünberger W (2006) Operative Korrektur kongenitaler Fehlbildungen. Frauenarzt 47: 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen PK (1982) Longitudinal vaginal septum. Euro J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 13: 253–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen PK (2000) Clinical implications of the didelphic uterus: long-term follow-up of 49 cases. Euro J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 91: 183–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khalifa E, Toner JP, Jones HW Jr (1993) The role of abdominal metroplasty in the era of operative hysteroscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176: 208–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kupesse S, Kurjah A (1998) Septate uterus defection and prediction of obstetrical complication by different forms of ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 17: 631–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollo A, De Franciscis P, Colacurci N, Cobellis L, Perino A, Venezia R, Alviggi C, De Placido G (2008) Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial. Fertil Steril 91: 2628–2631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nahum GG (1998) Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med 43: 877–887

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nawroth F, Rahimi G, Nawroth C, Foth D, Ludwig M, Schmidt T (2006) Is there an association between septate uterus and endometriosis? Hum Reprod 21 542–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S, Strissel PL, Strick R, Oppelt PG, Doerr HG, Schott HG, Schott GE, Hucke J, Wallwiener D, Beckmann MW (2005) The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex-associeted Mal-formation) Classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril 84: 1493–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oppelt P, von Have M, Paulsen M, Strissel PL, Strick R, Brucker S, Wallwiener D, Beckmann MW (2007) Female genital malformations and their associated abnormalities. Fertil Steril 87: 335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raga F, Bauset C, REmohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simón C, Pellicer A (1998) Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 12: 2277–2281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Römer T (2007) Hysteroskopischer Wegweiser für Gynäkologen, 2. Aufl. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Römer T (2009) Operative Hysteroskopie, 2. Aufl. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Römer T (2010) Uterine Fehlbildungen. In: Ludwig M (Hrsg) Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin. Marseille- Verlag, München, S 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Römer T (2011) Uterusfehlbildungen. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Römer T, Lober R (1997) Hysteroscopic correction of a complete septate uterus using a ballon technique. Hum Reprod 12: 478–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Römer T, Schmidt T, Foth D (2000) Pre- and postoperative hormonal treatment in patients with hysteroscopic surgery. Contrib Gynecol Obstet 20: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rózewicki S, Bielewicz W, Iwanicki M, Puchalski A (1992) Developmental anomalies of the uterus in a population of 3000 women with various causes of infertility. Ginekol Pol 63: 515–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saleem SN (2003) MR imaging diagnosis of uterovaginal anomalies: current state of the art. Radiographics 23: e13 Epub 2003 Jun 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC (2008) Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 14: 415–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomazevic T, Ban-Frangez H, Ribic-Pucelj M, Premrusren T, Verdenik I (2007) Small uterine septum ist an important risk variable for preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135: 154–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ugur M, Turan C, Mungan T, Kuscu E, Senöz S, Agis HT, Gökmen O (1995) Endometriosis in association with müllerian anomalies. Gynecol Obstet Invest 40: 261–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Köln-Weyertal, Weyertal 76, 50931, Köln

    Prof. Dr. med. T. Römer

  2. amedes, Zentrum für Endokrinologie, Kinderwunsch und Pränatale Medizin im Barkhof, Mönckebergstraße 10, 20095, Hamburg

    Prof. Dr. med. F. Nawroth

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. med. T. Römer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. med. F. Nawroth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck

    Klaus Diedrich  & Georg Griesinger  & 

  2. amedes, Zentrum für Endokrinologie, Kinderwunsch und Pränatale Medizin im Barkhof, Hamburg

    Michael Ludwig

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Römer, T., Nawroth, F. (2013). Uterine Fehlbildungen. In: Diedrich, K., Ludwig, M., Griesinger, G. (eds) Reproduktionsmedizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30181-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30181-0_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30180-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30181-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation