Skip to main content

Advances of Geo-Disaster Mitigation Technologies in Taiwan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress of Geo-Disaster Mitigation Technology in Asia

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

Abstract

Taiwan is located in the typhoon district of the Pacific Ocean and is hit by typhoons averaged 3.6 times annually. Many large scale hillside development projects were undertaken in the past decades. These areas have become very vulnerable to natural hazard and usually are subject to heavy damage under slope-land disasters. The loss of people’s lives and properties are severe. The average death toll was 8.26 casualties per event from 1981 to 1999. Starting from 1992, huge resources had been spent in the research of debris flows and landslides. After the assessment and warning system started on 2000, the number of casualties decreased to an averaged 2.23 per event between 2000 and 2008 and the average decreased as time progress. There were 22 large landslides or debris flows in 2008, but the average casualty was only 0.55 per event. This paper describes the technology advances from 2000 to 2010 in Taiwan. The most important advances are in the assessment technology, warning technology and mitigation concepts. The assessment method started with pure empirical formula, then improved to delimiting hazard zone numerically. The most recent change is to include social vulnerability in assessment. The warning system started with very local monitoring to nationwide warning with fine resolution quantitative precipitation estimation with multiple sensor radar system. The warning time has improved to more than 24 h before the disaster. The concept for mitigation changes from traditional structure countermeasures to ecological means. However the most fundamental change is the shifting emphasis from structure mitigation to non-structure mitigation with planning, education and drills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger WN, Brooks N, Graham B, Agnew M, Eriksen S (2004) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Final project report, Norwich UK: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Caine N (1980) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geografiska Annaler 62A(1/2):23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark G, Moser S, Ratick S, Dow K, Meyer W, Emani S, Jin W, Kasperson J, Kasperson R, Schwarz H (1998) Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: the case of revere, MA., USA. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 3(1):59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZY (2000) The impact force of debris flow on the slit dam, Department of Civil Engineering, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou BV, Li DJ, Lo DF, Lu JJ, Yang CH (1991) Guide of prevention for debris flow. Science Press, Beijing, pp 96–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20(4):529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourley JJ, Maddox RA, Burgess DW, Howard KW (2002) An exploratory multisensory technique for quantitative estimation of stratiform rainfall. J Hydrometeor 3:166–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo (2001) Introduction to ecological engineering methods, The 921 Earthquake Post-Disaster Recover Commission, Executive Yuan, Taiwan (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CL (1999) Potential Debris flow evaluation and classification. I, Project report, National Science Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh PY (2008) The effect stability of channel-bed equipted with incline type ground sills. Feng Chia university water resources engineering and conservation. Taichung, Taiwan (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CL, Wang CH, Chen LL (1992) Investigation and analysis of debris flows in Huai-Lien and Taitung. J Chin Soil Water Conserv 23(2):109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung YS, Chen JH (2002) Investigate into safety and engineering method of ecological engineering methods. Ecological engineering method conference. Taipei, Taiwan, pp 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan CD, Chen CL (2005) Debris flow caused by Typhoon Herb in Taiwan. In: Jakob M, Hungr O (eds) Chapter 21 in the book of Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer, published by Praxis Publishing Ltd., London, pp. 539–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan CD, Lee MH (2004) A debris-flow rainfall-based warning model. J Chin Soil Water Conserv 35(3):273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien PY Lan Y (1991) Rheology of hyperconcentrations, J Hydraul Eng ASCE 117:346–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer DK, Wilson RC, Mark RK, Brabb EE, Brown WM, Ellen SD, Harp EL, Wieczorek GF, Alger CS, Zatkin RS (1987) Real-time landslide warning during heavy rainfall. Science 238:921–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li HC, Chen ZE, Lin SW, Lee CH, Chen HL, Yu LF (2012) A study of the Social Vulnerability in Disaster-isolated Areas — the Case of Sanjhan Tribein Hualien",13th Cross-Strait symposium on Environmental Resources and Ecological Conservation, Haulien, Taiwan p 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HC, Liu KF (2010) Evaluation of the indirect loss from debris flow hazard—with Song-He village as an example. J Chin Inst Civ Hydraul Eng 22(2):159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HC, Young HH (2011) Establishment and application of household loss model for slope-land hazard. J Chin Inst Civ Hydraul Eng 23(4):437–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin PS, Lin JY, Chan KF, Chou WH (2007) An experimental study of the impact force of debris flows on slit dams, The Fourth International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin JY (2006) Flexible retaining structure for evaluation of debris-flow hazards mitigation. National Science Council, Council of Agriculture, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CY, Chiou YW (2003) Introduction of ecological engineering methods. Mingwen Press, Taipei, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu KF, Huang MC (2006) Numerical simulation of debris flow with application on hazard area mapping. Computat Geosci 10:221–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu KF (1998) The countermeasures of debris flow. Technique of civil, first issue, 178–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu KF, Li HC (2006) Assessment of direct loss from debris flow hazard. Chin J Soil Water Conserv 37(2):143–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu KF, Li HC, Hsu YC (2009) Debris flow hazard assessment with numerical simulation. Nat Hazards 49:137–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Council “Project result summary from 2000–2010” (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih BJ, Jern KY, Shieh CL, Chen LJ (1997) A study on the hazardous debris flow zoning. In: Proceedings of the 1st National debris flow conference Taiwan, pp 141–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil and Water Conservation Bureau (1992) The specifications of conservatively technique of soil and water. Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil and Water Conservation Bureau (1996) The guide of soil and water conservation. Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai YF (2002) Delimiting debris flow hazard zone. Chin J Mech 18(2):91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF (1987) Effect of rainfall intensity and duration on debris flows in Central Santa Cruz mountains, California. In: Costa, JE, Wieczorek GF (eds) Debris flows/avalanches: process, recognition, and mitigation. Rev Eng Geol 7:103–114. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Bureau (1992) Survey report of current status of dam in Taiwan. Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu HL (2003) Using the ideal of natural ecological engineering methods to straighten on the landslides of debris flow and case study. Soil and Water Conservation Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu FC, Lein HB (1999) Discussion of delimiting dangerous debris flow deposition fan. Geotech Res 74:7–66

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper requires a lot of information, special thanks should be given to Dr. Wei Liang-Rung from the National Science Council in Taiwan and Dr. Yin Shao-Yun from the Bureau of water and soil conservation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ko-Fei Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, KF., Jan, CD., Lin, P.S., Li, HC. (2013). Advances of Geo-Disaster Mitigation Technologies in Taiwan. In: Wang, F., Miyajima, M., Li, T., Shan, W., Fathani, T. (eds) Progress of Geo-Disaster Mitigation Technology in Asia. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29107-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics