Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Debris flow hazard assessment with numerical simulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debris flow disasters are usually accompanied by serious loss of lives and properties. However, debris flows are also part of earth’s natural phenomenon, and so what is the reasonable budget to be spent on mitigation measures becomes an important issue for the budget allocation processes. This article utilizes economic concepts to propose a reasonable estimation of the hazard damage and the cost of proposed mitigation measures. The proposed method is composed of four steps, namely, delineating the area of the disaster with different return periods, itemizing the land use within those areas, calculating the hazard loss using official values, and computing the expected probable maximum loss with a probability distribution. The comparison between the assessment of hazard and the economic gains of any proposed mitigation measures can be used as a reference for future decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breaden JP (1973) The generation of flood damage time sequences. University of Kentucky Water Resources Institute Paper, No. 32

  • Chua KT, Lo KH (2004) Hazard assessment of debris flow for Leung King Estate of Hong Kong by incorporating GIS with numerical simulations. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council for Economic Planning and Development (2004) The investigation of typhoon aere and strategy for recovery. pp 5-7–5-9

  • Fisher A, Violette D, Chestnut L (1989) The value of reducing risks of death: a note on new evidence. J Policy Anal Manag 8(1):88–100. doi:10.2307/3324426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman AM III (1993) The measurement of environmental and resource values. Theory and methods. Resources of the Future, Washington, DC

  • Grigg NS, Helweg OJ (1975) State-of-the art of estimating flood damage in urban areas. Water Resour Bull 11(2):379–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg NS, Botham LH, Rice L, Shoemaker WJ, Tucker LS (1976) Urban drainage and flood control projects economic, legal and financial aspects. Hydrology Paper, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Hicks J (1946) Value and capital: an inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien PY, Lan Y (1991) Rheology of hyperconcentrations. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 117:346–353. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:3(346)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laigle D, Marchi L (2000) Example of mud/debris-flow hazard assessment, using numerical models. Debris-flow hazard mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Proceedings of international conference, Taipei, pp 417–424

  • Lee CH (2006) Household debris-flow disaster damage assessment in Taiwan. Master’s thesis in Institute of Natural Resource Management, National Taipei University

  • Lin GF, Chen LH, Lai JN (2006) Assessment of risk due to debris flow events: a case study in central Taiwan. Nat Hazards 39(1):1–14. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-1922-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu KF, Huang MC (2006) Engineering planning of debris flow protection measure with numerical simulation. Eng Geosci 10:221–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JT, Hammitt JK, Liu JL (1997) Estimated hedonic wage function and value of life in a developing country. Econ Lett 57:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo M, Vincenzo D (2004) Estimation of debris flow magnitude in eastern Italian Alps. Earth Surf Process Landf 29(2):207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monthly Bulletin of Statistics (2005) Directorate-General of budget, accounting and statistics, vol 420. Executive Yuan, R.O.C.

  • National science and technology Center for Disaster Reduction, NCDR (2005) Study on the design of debris flow hazard magnitude for non-structure strategy in Taiwan. pp 183–185

  • Shih BJ, Jern KY, Shieh CL, Chen LJ (1997) A study on the hazardous debris flow zoning. Proceedings of the 1st national debris flow conference, Taiwan, pp 141–155

  • Staffler H, Berger E, Zischg A (2006) Localization and assessment of potential damages in settlements and infrastructures caused by floods and debris flow as a decision basis for the prioritization of mitigation measures. Geophys Res Abstr 8:03308

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1980) Debris flow on prismatic open channel. J Hydraul Div ASCE 106(HY3):381–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Talanov EA (2007) Regional assessment of ecological and economic risk of water erosion and debris flows. Almaty, 352 pp (in Russian)

  • Tsai CT, Yu PS (1994) GIS system applied in flood disaster II. Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering of National Cheng Kung University

  • Tsai CT, Yu PS (1995) GIS system applied in flood disaster III. Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering of National Cheng Kung University

  • Xue LM, Wang SW (1987) Estimation of the value of life for employed workers in Taiwan: a wage-risk approach. Ching chi chuan lun, No. 108

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research is supported by National Science Council, Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ko-Fei Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, KF., Li, HC. & Hsu, YC. Debris flow hazard assessment with numerical simulation. Nat Hazards 49, 137–161 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9285-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9285-8

Keywords

Navigation