Abstract
Geoid computation according to the Stokes-Helmert scheme requires accurate modelling of the variations of mass-density within topography. Current topographical models used in this scheme consider only horizontal variations, although in reality density varies three-dimensionally. Insufficient knowledge of regional three-dimensional density distributions prevents evaluation from real data. In light of this deficiency, we attempt to estimate the order of magnitude of the error in geoidal heights caused by neglecting the depth variations by calculating, for artificial but realistic mass-density distributions, the difference between results from 2D and 3D models.
Our previous work has shown that for simulations involving simple mass-density distributions in the form of planes, discs or wedges, the effect of mass-density variation unaccounted for in 2D models can reach centimeter-level magnitude in areas of high elevation, or where large mass-density contrasts exist. However, real mass-density distributions are more complicated than those we have modeled so far, and involve multiple structures whose effects might mitigate each other. We form a more complex structure by creating an array of discs that individually we expect to have a very significant effect, and show that while the contribution of such an array to the direct topographical effect on geoidal height is sub centimeter (0.85 cm for our simulation), the resulting primary indirect topographical effect may reach several centimeters or more (5 cm for our simulation).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baran I, Kuhn M, Claessens SJ, Featherstone WE, Holmes SA, Vaníček P (2006) A synthetic Earth gravity model designed specifically for testing regional gravimetric geoid determination algorithms. J Geod 80:1–16
Bassin C, Laske G, Masters G (2000) The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America. EOS Trans AGU 81:F897
Bessel FW (1813) Auszug aus einem Schreiben des Herrn Prof. Bessel. Zach’s Monatliche Correspondenz zur Beförderung der Erd- und Himmelskunde, XXVII, pp 80–85
Heck B, Seitz K (2007) A comparison of the tesseroid, prism and point-mass approaches for mass reductions in gravity field modelling. J Geod 81:121–136
Huang J, Vaníček P, Pagiatakis S, Brink W (2001) Effect of topographical density variation on geoid in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. J Geod 74:805–815
Kingdon R, Vaníček P, Santos M (2009) First results and testing of a forward modelling approach for estimation of 3D density effects on geoidal heights. Canad J Earth Sci 46(8):571–585. doi:10.1139/E09-018
Kuhn M (2003) Geoid determination with density hypotheses from isostatic models and geological information. J Geod 77:50–65
Martinec Z (1993) Effect of lateral density variations of topographical masses in improving geoid model accuracy over Canada. Contract Report for Geodetic Survey of Canada, Ottawa
Martinec Z (1998) Boundary value problems for gravimetric determination of a precise geoid (Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences). Springer, New York
Martinec Z, Vaníček P (1994a) Direct topographical effect of Helmert’s condensation for a spherical approximation of the geoid. Manuscripta Geodaetica 19:257–268
Martinec Z, Vaníček P (1994b) The indirect effect of topography in the Stokes-Helmert technique for a spherical approximation of the geoid. Manuscripta Geodaetica 19:213–219
Martinec Z, Vaníček P, Mainville A, Véronneau M (1995) The effect of lake water on geoidal height. Manuscripta Geodaetica 20:199–203
Mollweide KB (1813) Auflösung einiger die Anziehing von Linien Flächen und Köpern betreffenden Aufgaben unter denen auch die in der Monatl Corresp Bd XXIV. S, 522. vorgelegte sich findet. Zach’s Monatliche Correspondenz zur Beförderung der Erd- und Himmelskunde, XXVII, pp 26–38
Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2000) The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. J Geod 74:552–560. doi:10.1007/s001900000116
Nagy D, Papp G, Benedek J (2002) Corrections to “The gravi- tational potential and its derivatives for the prism”. J Geod 76:475. doi:10.1007/s00190-002-0264-7
Pagiatakis, S., D. Fraser, K. McEwen, A. Goodacre and M. Véronneau (1999). Topographic mass density and gravimetric geoid modelling. Bollettino di Geofisica
Paul MK (1974) The gravity effect of a homogeneous polyhedron for three dimensional interpretation. Pure Appl Geophys 112:553–561
Pohánka V (1998) Optimum expression for computation of the gravity field of a polyhedral body with linearly increasing density. Geophys Prospect 46:391–404
Seitz K, Heck B (2001) Tesseroids for the calculation of topographic reductions. IAG 2001 Scientific Assembly, Budapest, Hungary, September 2–7
Tzaivos IN, Featherstone WE (2001) First results of using digital density data in gravimetric geoid computation in Australia. In: Sideris MG (ed) Gravity, geoid and geodynamics. Springer, Berlin, pp 335–340
Vaníček P, Kleusberg A (1987) The Canadian geoid – stokesian approach. Manuscripta Geodaetica 12:86–98
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kingdon, R., Vaníček, P., Santos, M. (2012). Effects of Hypothetical Complex Mass-Density Distributions on Geoidal Height. In: Kenyon, S., Pacino, M., Marti, U. (eds) Geodesy for Planet Earth. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20337-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20338-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)