Abstract
Kennedy [9] proposes a semantics for positive form adjectives on which the standard for ascribing an adjective A makes the individuals that are A stand out from those that are not. To account for the differences between absolute and relative adjectives, Kennedy posits that the maximal and minimal degrees on closed scales naturally make individuals stand out in a way that degrees found away from the endpoints of a scale cannot. I argue that the ability of a degree to make individuals stand out is due less to scale structure than to the nature of the property the adjective describes. Thus, degrees that are not endpoints can behave like absolute standards as long as the application criteria for the property are clear. I relate the identifiability of such criteria to whether the property ascription can be modeled in terms of rule- vs. similarity-based classification (see e.g. [5]).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bale, A.: The Universal Scale and the Semantics of Comparison. PhD thesis, McGill University (2006)
Barker, C.: The dynamics of vagueness. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 1–36 (2002)
Foppolo, F., Panzeri, F.: Do children know when their room counts as clean? Ms., University of Milano-Bicocca (2010)
Gärdenfors, P.: Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Hahn, U., Chater, N.: Similarity and rules: distinct? exhaustive? empirically distinguishable? Cognition 65, 197–230 (1998)
Hay, J., Kennedy, C., Levin, B.: Scale structure underlies telicity in degree achievements. In: Matthews, T., Strolovitch, D. (eds.) Proceedings of SALT IX, Ithaca, NY, pp. 127–144. CLC Publications (1999)
Kennedy, C.: Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. Garland, New York (1999) (1997 UCSC Ph.D thesis)
Kennedy, C., McNally, L.: Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81(2), 345–381 (2005)
Kennedy, C.: Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30, 1–45 (2007)
Klein, E.: A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 1–45 (1980)
Lasersohn, P.: Pragmatic halos. Language 75, 522–551 (1999)
Rotstein, C., Winter, Y.: Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 12, 259–288 (2004)
Syrett, K.: Learning about the Structure of Scales: Adverbial Modification and the Acquisition of the Semantics of Gradable Adjectives. PhD thesis, Northwestern University (2007)
Unger, P.: Ignorance. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1975)
van Rooij, R.: Vagueness and linguistics. In: Ronzitti, G. (ed.) The Vagueness Handbook. Springer, Heidelberg (to appear)
Williamson, T.: Vagueness and ignorance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66, 145–162 (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
McNally, L. (2011). The Relative Role of Property Type and Scale Structure in Explaining the Behavior of Gradable Adjectives. In: Nouwen, R., van Rooij, R., Sauerland, U., Schmitz, HC. (eds) Vagueness in Communication. VIC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6517. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18445-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18446-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)