Skip to main content

Totally Non-invasive Continuous Cardiac Output Measurement with the Nexfin CO-Trek

  • Chapter
Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2011

Part of the book series: Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2011 ((AUICEM,volume 1))

Abstract

Cardiac output is one of the most important physiological parameters as it is the major determinant of oxygen delivery (DO2). Its measurement is of special importance since so many of our efforts in the care of critically ill and high-risk surgical patients are aimed at optimizing its value by various therapeutic means. The importance of measuring cardiac output is further highlighted by the many studies that have repeatedly shown that clinical evaluation and conventional monitoring alone are inaccurate and unreliable for the assessment of cardiac output, and that adequate resuscitation cannot be based on normalization of vital signs alone [1]–[4]. Although there is little evidence that the measurement of cardiac output per se improves outcome, this is also true for all other hemodynamic parameters that are in common daily use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wo CCJ, Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Bishop MH, Kram HB, Hardin E (1993) Unreliability of blood pressure and heart rate to evaluate cardiac output in emergency resuscitation and critical illness. Crit Care Med 21: 218–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meregalli A, Oliveira RP, Friedman G (2004) Occult hypoperfusion is associated with increased mortality in hemodynamically stable, high-risk, surgical patients. Crit Care 8: R60–R65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Veale WN Jr, Morgan JH, Beatty JS, Sheppard SW, Dalton ML, Van de Water JM (2005) Hemodynamic and pulmonary fluid status in the trauma patient: are we slipping? Am Surg 71: 621–625

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grissom CK, Morris AH, Lanken PN, et al (2009) Association of physical examination with pulmonary artery catheter parameters in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 37: 2720–2726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Camporota L, Beale R (2010) Pitfalls in hemodynamic monitoring based on the arterial pressure waveform. Crit Care 14: 124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wesseling KH, de Wit B, Weber JA, Smith NT (1983) A simple device for continuous measurement of cardiac output. Adv Cardiovasc Phys 5: 16–52

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wesseling KH, Jansen JRC, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ (1993) Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 74: 2566–2573

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jansen JRC, Schreuder JJ, Mulier JP, Smith NT, Settels JJ, Wesseling KH (2001) A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 87: 212–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. de Wilde RBP, Schreuder JJ, van den Berg PCM, Jansen JR (2007) An evaluation of cardiac output by five pulse contour techniques during cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 62: 760–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Wilde RBP, Geerts BF, Cui J, van den Berg PCM, Jansen JRC (2009) Performance of three minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring systems. Anaesthesia 64: 762–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stover JF, Stocker R, Lenherr R, Neff TA, Cottini SR, Zoller B, B’echir M (2009) Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiology 9:6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Jorgensen CC, Jørgensen TB, Ruhnau B, Secher NH, Kehlet H (2009) Orthostatic intolerance and the cardiovascular response to early postoperative mobilization. Br J Anaesth 102: 756–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Ruhnau B, Secher NH, Kehlet H (2007) Flow-related techniques for preoperative goal-directed fluid optimization. Br J Anaesth 98: 38–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perel, A., Settels, J.J. (2011). Totally Non-invasive Continuous Cardiac Output Measurement with the Nexfin CO-Trek. In: Vincent, JL. (eds) Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2011. Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2011, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18081-1_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18081-1_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18080-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18081-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics