Skip to main content

Innovation Communication as a Cross-Functional Dynamic Capability: Strategies for Organizations and Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategies and Communications for Innovations

Abstract

This book chapter draws on the dynamic capability approach to specify the elements of the dynamic capability innovation communication necessary to maintain the management of communication processes, tools and activities regarding the communication of a corporation’s or collaborative network’s innovation portfolio in the innovation economy. Dynamic capabilities can facilitate enterprise performance in a continuously changing environment with rapid innovation and globally spread resources, capacities, and stakeholders. In this context, innovation communication enables systematically planned transactional information transmissions related to innovations, context-issues of innovations and innovative capability and addresses communication markets, resource markets and sales markets based on a chosen innovation communication strategy. As one of a corporation’s dynamic capabilities, innovation communication may not only positively influence an innovation’s diffusion or innovation reputation in environmental dynamics but may also re-shape different markets and collaborative networks as well as create and extend strategic assets to communicate innovations in a highly competitive innovation economy. After introducing a foundation of sustainable enterprise performance by dynamic capabilities in the innovation economy, this book chapter presents a conceptual definition and description of the elements of the cross-functional dynamic capability innovation communication including a classification system as a fundamental basis on which future research might build on, in particular to specify the dynamic capability innovation communication for empirical research studies. Based on the characteristics of innovation communication, strategies and strategic tools for organizations and collaborative networks are also provided to support decision-making in strategic corporate communication management.

Author’s Note:

This book chapter represents ideas from the Ph.D. thesis work by Nicole Pfeffermann and thus is based on the publication (pending process).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Akdeniz, M.B., Gonzalez-Padron, T., & Calantone, R.J. (2010). An integrated marketing capability benchmarking approach to dealer performance through parametric and nonparametric analyses. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1): 150–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, V. & Bowman, V. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1): 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argenti, P.A. (2007). Corporate Communication. (4th ed.). New York: Mc-Graw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argenti, P.A. (2009). Strategic Corporate Communication. A Global Approach for Doing Business in the New India. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(August): 291–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, E.W. & Pinkleton, B.E. (2006). Strategic Public Relations Management (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoko, O., Härtel, C., Fisher, G., & Fujimoto, Y. (2004). Communication Competence in Cross-Cultural Business Interactions. In D. Tourish, & O. Hargie (Eds.), Key Issues in Organizational Communication (pp. 157–171). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Äyväri, A. & Möller, K. (1999). Marketing Capability of Small Firms Operating in Networks. Helsinki: Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulu. Working papers/Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration: W; 227; ISBN: 951-791-407-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, R.D. & Babcock, B.D. (2001). Language-based communication zones in international business communication. The Journal of Business Communication, 38(4): 372–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., Jermier, J., & Lafferty, B. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1): 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. (2007). Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering. A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belasen, A.T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Corporate Communication. A Competing Values Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. & Heath, C. (2008). Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3): 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, J.R. (1985). Fundamentals of Communication. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brem, A. (2008). The Boundaries of Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Conceptual Background and Essays on Selected Theoretical and Empirical Aspects. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W.F. & Nakamura, G.V. (1984). The Nature and Functions of Schemas. In R.S. Wyer Jr., & Srull, T.K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1; pp. 119–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, M. (2003). Integrierte Unternehmens- und Markenkommunikation (3rd ed.). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, M. (2005). Unternehmens- und Marketingkommunikation. Handbuch für ein integriertes Kommunikationsmanagement. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, M. (2008). Planning Integrated Marketing Communications. In H. Sievert, & D. Bell (Eds.), Communication and Leadership in the 21st Century (pp. 13–34). Gütersloh, Germany: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, M. (2009). Integrierte Unternehmens- und Markenkommunikation: Strategische Planung und operative Umsetzung. (5th ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, M. & Ahlers, G.M. (2011). Integrated Communication in the Innovation Process. In M. Hülsmann, & N. Pfeffermann (Eds.), Strategies and Communications for Innovations (Chapter 10). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfield, C.R., Goldney, J., & Gunning, S. (2008). Whiff. The Revolution of Scent Communication in the Information Age. New York: Quimby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, D.S. & Verona, G. (2009). Dynamic marketing capabilities in science-based firms: An exploratory investigation of the pharmaceutical industry. British Journal of Management, 20: 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A., Christensen, C.M., & Wheelwright, S.C. (2009). Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, M. & Ruffner, M. (1978). Human Communication. A Revision of Approaching Speech/Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, W., Park, J.E., & Chaiy, S. (2010). How does CRM technology transform into organizational performance? A mediating role of marketing capability. Journal of Business Research, 63: 849–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3): 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W. (2006). Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding IndustrialInnovation. In H.W. Chesbrough, J. West, & W. Vanhaverbeke (Eds.), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. & Poole, M.S. (2004). Strategic Organizational Communication in a Global Economy. (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J.P. (2004). Corporate Communication – Theory and Practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. (2008). Corporate Communication: A Guide to Theory and Practice. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, L.A., & Johnson, S.L. (2006). Customer-centric innovation. Marketing Management, 15(2): 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahinden, U. (2006). Framing. Eine integrative Theorie der Massenkommunikation. Konstanz, Germany: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daschkovska, K., Pfeffermann, N., Meyer-Larsen, N., & Hülsmann, M. (2010). Adoption Framework for Innovations in Logistic Transport Chains. In W. Kersten, T. Blecker, & C. Lüthje (Eds.), Pioneering Solutions in Supply Chain Management. A Comprehensive Insight into Current Management Approaches (pp. 347–364). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H., Leibold, M., & Voelpel, S. (Eds.) (2006). Strategic Management in the Innovation Economy. Strategy Approaches and Tools for Dynamic Innovation Capabilities. Erlangen: Publics Publishing and Wiley-VCH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente Sabate, J.M. & de Quevedo Puente, E. (2003). The concept and measurement of corporate reputation: An application to spanish financial intermediaries. Corporate Reputation Review, 5(4): 280–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, B. & Meyer, R. (2005). Strategy Synthesis: Resolving Strategy Paradoxes to Create Competitive Advantage. (2nd ed.) London: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, S. (2005). The Leader’s Guide to Storytelling: Mastering the Art and Discipline of Business Narrative. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • deVito, J.A. (1997). Human Communication; The Basic Course. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drejer, A. (2002). Situations for innovation management: towards a contingency model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(1): 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (1999). Success in high technology markets: Is marketing capability critical? Marketing Science Institute (Working Paper Report No. 99-119), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, A. & Butcher, T. (2008). Supply Chain Management and Knowledge Management – Integrating Critical Perspectives in Theory and Practice. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esch, F.-R. (2006). Wirkung integrierter Kommunikation. Ein verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Ansatz für Werbung. (4th ed.) Gabler, Germany: Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.S. & Pentland, B.T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administration Science Quarterly, 48(1): 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, S. (2009). Strategische Kommunikation für Technologie und Innovationen – Konzeption und Umsetzung. In A. Zerfaß & K.M. Möslein (Eds.), Kommunikation als Erfolgsfaktor im Innovationsmanagement: Strategien im Zeitalter der Open Innovation (pp. 209–226). Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fog, K., Budtz, C., Munch, P., & Blanchette, S. (2005). Storytelling: Branding in Practice. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, K., Müller, M., & Sottong, H. (2006). Storytelling. Das Praxisbuch. Wien: Carl Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galotti, K. (2003). Cognitive Psychology In and Out of the Laboratory. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golfetto, F. & Rinallo, D. (2008). Reshaping Markets Through Collective Marketing Strategies: Lesson from the Textile Industry. In K. Tollin & A. Carù (Eds.), Strategic Market Creation. A New Perspective on Marketing and Innovation Management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M.B. & Hirsch, P.B. (2010). Corporate Communication. Strategic Adaption for Global Practice. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. (2008). Contemporary Strategy Analysis (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grensing-Pophal, L. (2006). The Essentials of Corporate Communications and Public Relations (Compiler: Harvard Business School Press/Society for Human Resource Management). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, C., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M.A., Singh, H., Teece, D.J., & Winter, S.G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, P. (2008). Open and Closed Innovation: Different Cultures for Different Strategies. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, H.-W. (1987). Kommunikation und Diffusion von Produktinnovationen im Konsumgüterbereich : Prognose d. Erstkäufe bei kauffördernder und kaufhemmender Kommunikation mit Diffusionsmodellen. Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C.W.L. & Jones, G.R. (2008). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. Boston: Houghton Miffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer, G., Körner, R., Nikolaus, U., & Poost, A. (2009). Marketing von Innovationen. Strategien und Mechanismen zur Durchsetzung von Innovationen. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck, S. (2009). Innovationskommunikation in den Arenen der Medien. Campaigning, Framing und Storytelling. In A. Zerfaß & K.M. Möslein (Eds.), Kommunikation als Erfolgsfaktor im Innovationsmanagement. Strategien im Zeitalter der Open Innovation. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingenhoff, D. & Röttger, U. (2008). Issues Management. Ein zentrales Verfahren der Unternehmenskommunikation. In M. Meckel, & Schmid, B.F. (Eds.), Unternehmenskommunikation : Kommunikationsmanagement aus Sicht der Unternehmensführung (pp. 323–354). Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablin, F.M. & Sias, P.M. (2004). Communication Competence. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putman (Eds.) The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods (pp. 818–864). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. & Tollin, K. (2008). Marketing’s Role for Firms’ Renewal and Innovation Capability. In K. Tollin & A. Carù (Eds.), Strategic Market Creation. A New Perspective on Marketing and Innovation Management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. & Trochim, W.M.K. (2007). Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kima, S.-H. & Nam, S. (2004). Across the threshold: Role of performance and compatibility in innovative new products’ market penetration. Industrial Marketing Management, 33: 689–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koolman, K. (2006). Markenerfolg mit Marketinginnovationen. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A. (2010). (Ed.). Sensory Marketing: Research on the Sensuality of Products. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber-Riel, W. (1993). Bildkommunikation : Imagerystrategien für die Werbung. München, Germany: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichenthaler, U. & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for open innovation: complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8): 1315–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, M. & Bandhold, H. (2009). Scenario Planning. The Link Between Future and Strategy (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maathuis, O., Rodenburg, J., & Sikkel, D. (2004). Credibility, emotion or reason? Corporate Reputation Review, 6(4): 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Bass, F.M. (1990). New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. Journal of Marketing, 54: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Bass, F.M. (1995). Diffusion of new products: Empirical generalizations and managerial uses. Marketing Science, 14(3): 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Wind, Y. (2000). New-Product Diffusion Models: From Theory to Practice. In V. Mahajan, E. Muller, & Y. Wind (Eds.) New-Product Diffusion Models (pp. 3–27). Düsseldorf: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martilla, J.A. (1971). Word-of-mouth communication in the industrial adoption process. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(2): 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mast, C. & Zerfaß, A. (2005). Neue Ideen erfolgreich durchsetzen. Das Handbuch der Innovationskommunikation. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: F.A.Z.-Institut für Management-, Markt- und Medieninformation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mast, C., Huck, S., & Zerfass, A. (2005). Innovation communication. Outline of the concept and empirical findings from Germany. Innovation Journalism, 2(7): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mast, C., Huck, S., & Zerfaß, A. (2006). Innovationskommunikation in dynamischen Märkten. Empirische Ergebnisse und Fallstudien. Berlin, Germany: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol, T. (2011). The Role of Word of Mouth in the Diffusion of Innovation. In M. Hülsmann, & N. Pfeffermann (Eds.), Strategies and Communications for Innovations (Chapter 9). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J., Thomas, H., & Wilson, D. (2005). Strategy: Analysis and Practice. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. (2005). Communication Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Contexts. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J., Sengupta, S., & Slater, S. (2009). Marketing of High-Technology Products and Innovations. (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, K. & Anttila, M. (1987). Marketing capability – A key success factor in small business? Journal of Marketing Management, 3(2): 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, C.P., Lehmann, D.R., & Markman, A.B. (2001). Entrenched knowledge structures and consumer response to new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N.A., Zou, S., Vorhies, D.W., & Katsikeas, C.S. (2003). Experiential and informational knowledge, architectural marketing capabilities, and the adaptive performance of export ventures: A cross-national study. Decision Sciences, 34(2): 287–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N.A., Slotegraaf, R.J., & Vorhies, D.W. (2009a). Linking marketing capabilities with profit growth. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4): 284–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N.A., Vorhies, D.W., & Mason, C.H. (2009b). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8): 909–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath, P., Nachiappan, S., & Ramanathan, R. (2010). The impact of marketing capability, operations capability and diversification strategy on performance: A resource-based view. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(2): 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordfors, D. (2009). Innovation Journalism, Attention Work and the Innovation Economy A Review of the Innovation Journalism Initiative 2003–2009. Innovation Journalism, 6(May 1): 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J. & Gash, D.C. (1994). Technological frames – making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2): 174–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pablo, A., Reay, T., Dewald, J.R., & Casebeer, A.L. (2007). Identifying, enabling and managing dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 687–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pae, J.H., & Lehmann, D.R. (2003). Multigeneration innovation diffusion: The impact of intergeneration time. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(1): 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papa, M.J., Daniels, T.D., & Spiker, B.K. (2008). Organizational Communication. Perspective and Trends. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres, R., Muller, E., & Mahajan, V. (2010). Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 63: 849–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfannenberg, J. & Zerfaß, A. (2005). (Eds.) Wertschöpfung durch Kommunikation. Frankfurt am Main: Frankfurter Allgemeine Buch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffermann, N. (2011). The Scent of Innovation – Towards an Integrated Management Concept for Visual and Scent Communication of Innovation. In M. Hülsmann & N. Pfeffermann (Eds.), Strategies and Communications for Innovations (Chapter 12). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffermann, N., Hülsmann, M., & Scholz-Reiter, B. (2008). Framing Innovations to Grasp Stakeholders’ Attention: A Dynamic Capability-Based Conception of Innovation Communication. Research Report 2007/08 International Graduate School for Dynamics in Logistics, Vol. 01, 2008, pp. 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzi, M. (2001). The Terminological Definition: Conflicts Between Theory. In F. Mayer (Ed.), Language for Special Purposes: Perspectives for the New Millennium, Linguistics and Cognitive Aspects, Knowledge Representation and Computational Linguistics, Terminology, Lexikography, and Didactics (Vol. 1, pp. 272–281). Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prandelli, E., Sawhney, M., & Verona, G. (2008). Collaborating with Customers to Innovate. Conceiving and Marketing Products in the Networking Age. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Lioukas, S. (2008). Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance. Conference Paper on Entrepreneurship and Innovation – Organizations, Institutions, Systems, and Regions. Copenhagen, CBS, June 17–20, 2008. Available at: http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=3718&cf=29 [date: 30-01-2010].

  • Putman, L.L. & Fairhurst, G.T. (2004). Discourse Analysis in Organizations. Issues and Concerns. In F.M. Jablin, & L.L. Putman (Eds.) The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods (pp. 78–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, J.E. & Esch, F.-R. (2009). Olfaktorische Reize in der Kommunikation. In M. Bruhn, F.-R. Esch, & T. Langer (Eds.), Handbuch Kommunikation: Grundlagen, innovative Ansätze, praktische Umsetzungen (pp. 285–315). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringland, D. (2006). Scenario Planning, Managing for the Future (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. (5th ed.). New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, M., Pfeffermann, N., Echelmeyer, W., & Rasch, C. (2011). The High-Tech Innovation ‘ParcelRobot’ – Patent Strategy and Communication Tools. In M. Hülsmann, & N. Pfeffermann (Eds.), Strategies and Communications for Innovations (Chapter 25). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlfs, J.H. (2001). Bandwagon Effects in High-Technology Industries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E. & Norman, D.A. (1988). Representation in Memory. In R.C. Atkinson (ed.) Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology: Vol. 2 Learning and Cognition (2nd ed., pp. 511587). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E. & Ortony, A. (1977). The Representation of Knowledge in Memory. In R.C. Anderson, R.J. Spiro, & W.E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge (pp. 99135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, B. (2008). Managing and Marketing Radical Innovations. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele, D.A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1): 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele, B. (2003). Frames, Framing, Framing-Effekte. Theoretische und methodische Grundlegung des Framing-Ansatzes sowie empirische Befunde zur Nachrichtenproduktion. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M.A. (2008). Strategic Management of Technological Innovation (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G. & Kliesch-Eberl, M. (2007). How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 913–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scents in Arts (2010). Available at http://www.scents-in-arts.com [date: 01-08-2010].

  • Simmons, A. (2007).Whoever Tells the Best Story Wins: How to Use Your Own Stories to Communicate with Power and Impact. New York: Amacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotegraaf, R.J. & Dickson, P.R. (2004). The paradox of a marketing planning capability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(4): 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.D. (2009). Strategic Planning for Public Relations (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somaya, D. & Teece, D.J. (2007). Patents, Licensing and Entrepreneurship: Effecting Innovation in Multi-Invention Context. In E. Sheshinski, R.J. Strom, & W.J. Baumol (eds.), Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and the Growth Mechanism of the Free-Market Enterprise. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., van der Bij, H., & Weggeman, M. (2005). Determinants of the level of knowledge application: a knowledge-based and information-processing perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(5): 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Nason, R.W., & Benedetto, A.D. (2008). Distinctive marketing and information technology capabilities and strategic types: A cross national investigation. Journal of International Marketing, 16(1): 4−38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowter, C.V. (2000). Marketing High Technology Services. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhoff, F. & Trommsdorff, V. (2011). Innovation Marketing – An Introduction. In M. Hülsmann, & N. Pfeffermann (Eds.), Strategies and Communications for Innovations (Chapter 8). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H. & Schreyögg, G. (2005). Management: Grundlagen der Unternehmensführung: Konzepte – Funktionen – Fallstudien (6th ed.). Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talke, K. (2005). Einführung von Innovationen. Marktorientierte strategische und operative Aktivitäten als kritische Erfolgsfaktoren. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deut. Univ.-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13): 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomochi, M., Murata, H., & Kono, M. (2005). A consumer-based model of competitive diffusion: The multiplicative effects of global and local network externalities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15: 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorff, V. & Steinhoff, F. (2007). Innovations Marketing. München: Franz Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuominen, M. (1997). Marketing Capability and Market Orientation in Strategy Interface. Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja B-1, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bulte, C. & Stremersch, S. (2004). Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Science, 23(4): 530–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Riel, C. & Fombrun, C. (2008). Essentials of Corporate Communication. Implementing Practices for Effective Reputation Management. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorhies, D.W. (1998). An investigation of the factors leading to the development of marketing capabilities and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorhies, D.W. & Morgan, N.A. (2003). A configuration theory assessment of marketing organization fit with business strategy and its relationship with marketing performance. Journal of Marketing, 67(1): 100–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorhies, D.W. & Morgan, N.A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 96(1): 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorhies, D.W., Morgan, R.E., & Autry, C.W. (2009). Product-market strategy and the marketing capabilities of the firm: impact on market effectiveness and cash flow performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12): 1310–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waarts, E., van Everdingena, Y.M., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2002). The dynamics of factors affecting the adoption of innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19: 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldmann, M.R. (1990). Schema und Gedächnis: das Zusammenwirken von Raum- und Ereignisschema beim Gedächnis für Alltagssituationen. Heidelberg, Germany: Roland Asanger Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. & Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5): 961–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J. (2003). The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11: 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellmon, T. (1988). Conceptualizing organizational communication competence: A rules-based perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, May 1: 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, U. & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1): 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaremba, A.J. (2003). Organizational Communication: Foundations for Business & Management. Mason, Ohio: Thomson/South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaremba, A.J. (2006). Organizational Communication: Foundations for Business & Collaboration. Mason, Ohio : Thomson/South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfaß, A. (2007). Unternehmenskommunikation und Kommunikationsmanagement: Grundlagen, Wertschöpfung, Integration. In M. Piwinger, & Zerfaß A. (eds.), Handbuch der Unternehmenskommunikation (pp. 21–70).Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfaß, A. (2009). Kommunikation als konstitutives Element im Innovationsmanagement – Soziologische und kommunikationswissenschaftliche Grundlagen der Open Innovation. In A. Zerfaß & K.M. Möslein (Eds.), Kommunikation als Erfolgsfaktor im Innovationsmanagement: Strategien im Zeitalter der Open Innovation (pp. 23–56). Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zerfaß, A. & Ernst, N. (2008). Kommunikation als Erfolgsfaktor im Innovationsmanagement. Ergebnisse einer Studie in deutschen Zukunftstechnologie-Branchen. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfaß, A. & Möslein, K.M. (2009). Kommunikation als Erfolgsfaktor im Innovationsmanagement: Strategien im Zeitalter der Open Innovation. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zerfaß, A., Sandhu, S., & Huck, S. (2004). Innovationskommunikation – Strategisches Handlungsfeld für Corporate Communications. In G. Bentele, M. Piwinger, & G. Schönborn (Eds.), Kommunikationsmanagement. Strategien, Wissen, Lösungen (August 2006; 1.24, pp. 1–30) München: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, S., Fang, E., & Zhao, S. (2003). The effect of export marketing capabilities on export performance: An investigation of Chinese exporters. Journal of International Marketing, 11(4): 32–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Pfeffermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Illustration of Definitions of Organizational Communication Competence and Marketing Capability (sorted in chronological and then alphabetical order and is not to be understood as a complete review)

Appendix: Illustration of Definitions of Organizational Communication Competence and Marketing Capability (sorted in chronological and then alphabetical order and is not to be understood as a complete review)

Type

Definition

Source

Marketing capabilities

“The marketing capabilities include product development, the process to develop and manage product and service offerings; pricing, the strategy to extract the optimal revenue from firm’s sales; channel management, the course of action to establish and maintain the channels of distribution that effectively and efficiently deliver value to end-user customers; marketing communications, the ability to manage customer value perceptions; selling, the activity to fulfill customer orders; market information management, the practice to acquire and use market knowledge; marketing planning, the ability to create marketing strategies that optimize the match between the firm’s resources and its marketplace; marketing implementation, the process to transform marketing strategy into realized resource deployments” (p. 153; based on Vorhies and Morgan 2005)

Akdeniz et al. (2010)

Marketing capability

“… marketing capability to be firm’s ability derived from two prominent components: marketing planning ability and marketing implementation ability.” (p. 850)

Chang et al. (2010)

Marketing capability

“Marketing capability is defined as the integrative process, in which a firm uses its tangible and intangible resources to understand complex consumer specific needs, achieve product differentiation relative to competition, and achieve superior brand equity” (p. 319; based on Day 1994; Dutta et al. 1999; Song et al. 2005, 2008).

Nath et al. (2010)

Dynamic marketing capabilities

“Dynamic marketing capabilities reflect human capital, social capital and the cognition of managers involved in the creation, use and integration of market knowledge and marketing resources in order to match and create market and technological change” (p. 103)

Bruni and Verona (2009)

Marketing capability model

“… we focus on capabilities that are consistent with both Day’s (1994) marketing capability model and Srivastava et al.’s (1998) framework linking market-based assets with cash-flow growth”. = market-sensing capability; CRM capabilities, and brand management capabilities (p. 285)

Morgan et al. (2009a)

Two interrelated marketing capability areas

“Two interrelated marketing capability areas have been identified: capabilities concerning individual ‘marketing mix’ processes, such as product development and management, pricing, selling, marketing communications, and channel management (e.g. Vorhies and Morgan 2005), and capabilities concerned with the processes of marketing strategy development and execution (e.g. Morgan et al. 2003). These capabilities may be rare, valuable, non-substitutable, and inimitable sources of advantage that can lead to superior firm performance (e.g. Vorhies and Morgan 2005). Further, as knowledge-based processes that become embedded over time, such capabilities may be difficult for competitors to imitate (e.g. Teece et al. 1997)” (pp. 910–911)

Morgan et al. (2009b)

Architectural marketing capabilities and marketing capability integration

“… to simultaneously model the ways that product-market strategy influences specialized and architectural marketing capabilities and marketing capability integration” (p. 1321)

Vorhies et al. (2009)

Marketing capabilities

Marketing capabilities are divided into inside-out capabilities, spanning capabilities, and outside-in capabilities (based on Day 1994)

Jones and Tollin (2008)

 

“Marketing capabilities – such as skill in segmentation, Organizational Capabilities Information Technology Capabilities and Strategic Types 9 targeting, pricing, and advertising – enable the organization to take advantage of its market-sensing and technological capabilities and to implement effective marketing programs” (pp. 8).

Song et al. (2008)

Marketing-mix capabilities

“… the capabilities used to orchestrate marketing-mix capabilities and their resource inputs involving market information management and marketing strategy development and execution” (p. 82)

Vorhies and Morgan (2005)

Marketing planning capability

“… marketing planning capability, we focus on specific elements fundamental to the overall marketing planning process” (p. 372)

Slotegraaf and Dickson (2004)

Organizational communication competence along three dimensions (and an overview of several conceptualizations/definitions)

“… conceptualize organizational communication competence along three dimensions: competence assessment criteria, competence levels, and ecological systems. Such a conceptualization acknowledges the cognitive and behavioral components of communication competence, the developmental nature of communication competence, and the embeddedness of communication competence at various levels of analysis” (p. 833)

Jablin and Sias (2004)

Architectural marketing capabilities

“Architectural marketing capabilities are defined in the literature as the processes by which firms plan appropriate combinations of available knowledge and other resources to deploy into their marketplace(s) and execute these planned resource deployments, transforming them into realized value offerings for target market(s).” (p. 293)

Morgan et al. (2003)

Two types of marketing capabilities

“We identified and assessed two types of marketing capabilities: specialized capabilities regarding the specific marketing mix-based work routines used to transform available resources into valuable outputs […] and architectural capabilities regarding the marketing strategy formulation and execution work routines used to develop and coordinate specialized capabilities and their resource inputs …” (p. 106)

Vorhies and Morgan (2003)

Marketing capability

“… marketing capability is defined as integrative processes designed to apply the collective knowledge, skills, and resources of the firm to the market-related needs of the business, enabling the business to add value to its goods and services and meet competitive demands.” (p. 19)

Weerawardena (2003)

Four functional export marketing capabilities

“… we focus on four functional export marketing capabilities: pricing capability, product development capability, distribution capability, and communication capability” (p. 36)

Zou et al. (2003)

External marketing capability and internal marketing capability

MAC = Marketing Capability

“… External MAC is a function of the extension of a firm’s network positions and weak ties, and of such more individual competencies like the networking ability of key managers (or the owner–manager in micro firms), and their ability to develop valid cognitive maps of interrelated nets. … second MAC is labelled Strategic marketing capability. It is composed of two principal sub-capabilities, (1) market targeting and positioning capabilities, and (2) relationship developing capability.” (p. 20)

Äyväri and Möller (1999)

Marketing capability

“Marketing Capability. A firm with a strong marketing capability – exhibiting superiority in identifying customer’s needs and in understanding the factors that influence consumer choice behavior – will be able to achieve better targeting and positioning of its brands relative to competing brands.” (p. 8)

Dutta et al. (1999)

Marketing capabilities

“… marketing capabilities are the integrative processes designed to apply the collective knowledge, skills and resources of the firm to the market-related needs of the business, enabling the business to add value to its goods and services, adapt to market conditions, take advantage of market opportunities and meet competitive threats (Day 1994).” (p. 4)

Vorhies (1998)

Marketing capability (inside-out, outside-in, and spanning processes)

“… marketing capability represents both the upstream or outside-in processes as well as the downstream or inside-out and spanning processes in regard tp business processes.” (p. 73)

Tuominen (1997)

Inside-out capability, outside-in capability, and spanning capabilities

“Capabilities can be usefully sorted into three categories, depending on the orientation and focus of the defining processes […]. At one end of the spectrum are those that are deployed from the inside out and activated by market requirements, competitive challenges, and external opportunities. […] At the other end of the spectrum are those capabilities whose focal point is almost exclusively outside the organization. The purpose of these outside-in capabilities is to connect the processes that define the other organizational capabilities to the external environment and enable the business to compete by anticipating market requirements ahead of competitors and creating durable relationships with customers, channel members, and suppliers. Finally, spanning capabilities are needed to integrate the inside-out and outside-in capabilities” (p. 41)

Day (1994)

Organizational communication competence

Conceptual definition of organizational communication competence consists of 13 related categories based on telephone interviews listing: friends; personal manner; successful behaviors; good leadership skills; understanding human nature; motivation; professionalism; organizational involvement; organized; feedback; interaction skills; effective verbal style; demonstration of knowledge (pp. 524–529)

Wellmon (1988)

Marketing capability

“The marketing capability of a firm is a multi-faceted phenomenon. It is a complex combination of the human resources or assets, market assets, and organisational assets of a firm” (p. 187)

Möller and Anttila (1987)

  1. Source: by the author

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pfeffermann, N. (2011). Innovation Communication as a Cross-Functional Dynamic Capability: Strategies for Organizations and Networks. In: Hülsmann, M., Pfeffermann, N. (eds) Strategies and Communications for Innovations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17223-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics