Skip to main content

Predicting Student Knowledge Level from Domain-Independent Function and Content Words

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6095))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We explored the possibility of predicting the quality of student answers (error-ridden, vague, partially-correct, and correct) to tutor questions by examining their linguistic patterns in 50 tutoring sessions with expert human tutors. As an alternative to existing computational linguistic methods that focus on domain-dependent content words (e.g., velocity, RAM, speed) in interpreting a student’s response, we focused on function words (e.g., I, you, but) and domain-independent content words (e.g., think, because, guess). Proportional incidence of these word categories in over 6,000 student responses to tutor questions was automatically computed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), a computer program for analyzing text. Multiple regression analyses indicated that two parameter models consisting of pronouns (e.g., I, they, those) and discrepant terms (e.g., should, could, would) were effective in predicting the conceptual quality of student responses. Furthermore, the classification accuracy of discriminant functions derived from the domain-independent LIWC features competed with conventional domain-dependent assessment methods. We discuss the possibility of a composite assessment algorithm that focuses on both domain-dependent and domain-independent words for dialogue-based ITSs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J., Corbett, A., Koedinger, K., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(2), 167–207 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Taylor, L., Weinstein, A., Shelby, R., Schulze, K.: Minimally Invasive Tutoring of Complex Physics Problem Solving. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 367–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Koedinger, K., Anderson, J., Hadley, W., Mark, M.: Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8, 30–43 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kurup, M., Greer, J.E., McCalla, G.: The Fawlty Article Tutor. In: Frasson, C., McCalla, G.I., Gauthier, G. (eds.) ITS 1992. LNCS, vol. 608, pp. 84–91. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heift, T., Schulze, M.: Error Diagnosis and Error Correction in Computer-Assisted Language Learning. CALICO 20(3), 433–436 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Graesser, A., Penumatsa, P., Ventura, M., Cai, Z., Hu, X.: Using LSA in AutoTutor: Learning Through Mixed-Initiative Dialogue in Natural Language. In: Landauer, T., McNamara, D., Dennis, S., Kintsch, W. (eds.) Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis, pp. 243–262. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Graesser, A., Lu, S., Jackson, G., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., Louwerse, M.M.: AutoTutor: A Tutor with Dialogue in Natural Language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36, 180–193 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Landauer, T., McNamara, D., Dennis, S., Kintsch, W. (eds.): Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, R.S., Pennebaker, J.W.: The Secret Life of Pronouns: Flexibility in Writing Style and Physical Health. Psychological Science 14, 60–65 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Mello, S., Dowell, N., Graesser, A.: Cohesion Relationships in Tutorial Dialogue as Predictors of Affective States. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay, B., Graesser, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 9–16. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hancock, J.T., Curry, L., Goorha, S., Woodworth, M.T.: On Lying and Being Lied to: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception. Discourse Processes 45, 1–23 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mairesse, F., Walker, M.A., Mehl, M.R., Moore, R.K.: Using Linguistic Cues for the Automatic Recognition of Personality in Conversation and Text. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 30, 457–500 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Pennebaker, J.W., Stone, L.D.: Words of Wisdom: Language Use Over the Life Span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(2), 291–301 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pennebaker, J.W.: Writing About Emotional Experiences as a Therapeutic Process. Psychological Sciences 8, 162–166 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., Booth, R.J.: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). Erlbaum, Mahway (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stiles, W.B.: In Describing Talk: A Taxonomy of Verbal Response Modes. Sage, Newbury Park (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pennebaker, J.W., King, L.A.: Linguistic Styles: Language Use as an Individual Difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77, 1296–1312 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boroditsky, L.: Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conception of Time. Cognitive Psychology 43, 1–22 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Whorf, B.: In Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press, Cambridge (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, T., Hasegawa-Johnson, M., Levinson, S.E.: Cognitive State Classification in a Spoken Tutorial Dialogue System. Speech Communication 48, 616–632 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Person, N., Lehman, B., Ozbun, R.: Pedagogical and Motivational Dialogue Moves Used by Expert Tutors. In: 17th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Glasgow, Scotland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Groom, C.J., Pennebaker, J.W.: Words. Journal of Research in Personality 36, 615–621 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pennebaker, J.W., Lay, T.C.: Language Use and Personality During Crises: Analyses of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s Press Conference. Journal of Research in Personality 36, 271–282 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kitayama, S.: Interaction Between Affect and Cognition in Word Perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58(2), 209–217 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen, J.: A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1), 155–159 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chipman, P.: An Analysis and Optimization of AutoTutor’s Student Model (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). The University of Memphis, Memphis (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Williams, C., D’Mello, S. (2010). Predicting Student Knowledge Level from Domain-Independent Function and Content Words. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6095. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13436-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13437-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics