Skip to main content

The Second Answer Set Programming Competition

  • Conference paper
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5753))

Abstract

This paper reports on the Second Answer Set Programming Competition. The competitions in areas of Satisfiability checking, Pseudo-Boolean constraint solving and Quantified Boolean Formula evaluation have proven to be a strong driving force for a community to develop better performing systems. Following this experience, the Answer Set Programming competition series was set up in 2007, and ran as part of the International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR). This second competition, held in conjunction with LPNMR 2009, differed from the first one in two important ways. First, while the original competition was restricted to systems designed for the answer set programming language, the sequel was open to systems designed for other modeling languages, as well. Consequently, among the contestants of the second competition were a CLP(FD) team and three model generation systems for (extensions of) classical logic. Second, this latest competition covered not only satisfiability problems but also optimization ones. We present and discuss the set-up and the results of the competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Marek, V., Truszczyński, M.: Stable models and an alternative logic programming paradigm. In: Apt, K., Marek, W., Truszczyński, M., Warren, D. (eds.) The Logic Programming Paradigm: a 25-Year Perspective, pp. 375–398. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Niemelä, I.: Logic programming with stable model semantics as a constraint programming paradigm. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 25(3-4), 241–273 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baral, C.: Knowledge Representation, Reasoning and Declarative Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing 9(3-4), 365–385 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Colmerauer, A., Kanoui, H., Pasero, R., Roussel, P.: Un systeme de communication homme-machine en Francais. Technical report, University of Marseille (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kowalski, R.: Predicate logic as a programming language. In: Rosenfeld, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Congress of the International Federation for Information Processing, pp. 569–574. North Holland, Amsterdam (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy, J.: Circumscription — a form of nonmonotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13(1-2), 27–39 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Reiter, R.: A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13(1-2), 81–132 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Kowalski, R., Bowen, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eiter, T., Leone, N., Mateis, C., Pfeifer, G., Scarcello, F.: A deductive system for non-monotonic reasoning. In: Dix, J., Furbach, U., Nerode, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pp. 364–375. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niemelä, I., Simons, P.: Smodels — an implementation of the stable model and well-founded semantics for normal logic programs. In: Dix, J., Furbach, U., Nerode, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pp. 420–429. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lifschitz, V.: Answer Set Planning. In: De Schreye, D. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 23–37. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borchert, P., Anger, C., Schaub, T., Truszczyński, M.: Towards Systematic Benchmarking in Answer Set Programming: The Dagstuhl Initiative. In: Lifschitz, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) LPNMR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2923, pp. 3–7. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Gebser, M., Liu, L., Namasivayam, G., Neumann, A., Schaub, T., Truszczyński, M.: The first answer set programming system competition. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds.) LPNMR 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4483, pp. 3–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Biere, A., Heule, M., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.): Handbook of Satisfiability. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Tinelli, C.: Solving SAT and SAT modulo theories: From an abstract Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland procedure to DPLL(T). Journal of the ACM 53(6), 937–977 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rossi, F., van Beek, P., Walsh, T. (eds.): Handbook of Constraint Programming. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Denecker, M., Kakas, A.C.: Abduction in Logic Programming. In: Kakas, A.C., Sadri, F. (eds.) Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2407, pp. 402–436. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell, D., Ternovska, E.: A framework for representing and solving NP search problems. In: Veloso, M., Kambhampati, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 430–435. AAAI Press / MIT Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kakas, A., Michael, A.: Air-Crew scheduling through abduction. In: Imam, I., Kodratoff, Y., El-Dessouki, A., Ali, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, pp. 600–611. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pelov, N., De Mot, E., Denecker, M.: Logic programming approaches for representing and solving constraint satisfaction problems: A comparison. In: Parigot, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1955, pp. 225–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Hentenryck, P.: Constraint Satisfaction in Logic Programming. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  23. http://asparagus.cs.uni-potsdam.de

  24. http://www.cs.kuleuven.be/~dtai/events/ASP-competition

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Denecker, M., Vennekens, J., Bond, S., Gebser, M., Truszczyński, M. (2009). The Second Answer Set Programming Competition. In: Erdem, E., Lin, F., Schaub, T. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5753. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_75

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_75

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04237-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04238-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics