Skip to main content

The First Answer Set Programming System Competition

  • Conference paper
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2007)

Abstract

This paper gives a summary of the First Answer Set Programming System Competition that was held in conjunction with the Ninth International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. The aims of the competition were twofold: first, to collect challenging benchmark problems, and second, to provide a platform to assess a broad variety of Answer Set Programming systems. The competition was inspired by similar events in neighboring fields, where regular benchmarking has been a major factor behind improvements in the developed systems and their ability to address practical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Niemelä, I.: Logic programming with stable model semantics as a constraint programming paradigm. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 25(3-4), 241–273 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Marek, V., Truszczyński, M.: Stable models and an alternative logic programming paradigm. In: Apt, K., et al. (eds.) The Logic Programming Paradigm: A 25-Year Perspective, pp. 375–398. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gelfond, M., Leone, N.: Logic programming and knowledge representation — the A-prolog perspective. Artificial Intelligence 138(1-2), 3–38 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Baral, C.: Knowledge Representation, Reasoning and Declarative Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Colmerauer, A., et al.: Un systeme de communication homme-machine en Francais. Technical report, University of Marseille (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kowalski, R.: Predicate logic as a programming language. In: Rosenfeld, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Congress of the International Federation for Information Processing, pp. 569–574. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy, J.: Circumscription — a form of nonmonotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13(1-2), 27–39 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Reiter, R.: A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13(1-2), 81–132 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Kowalski, R., Bowen, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing 9(3-4), 365–385 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marek, W., Truszczyński, M.: Stable semantics for logic programs and default theories. In: Lusk, E., Overbeek, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the North American Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 243–256. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bidoit, N., Froidevaux, C.: Negation by default and unstratifiable logic programs. Theoretical Computer Science 78(1), 85–112 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Eiter, T., et al.: A deductive system for non-monotonic reasoning. In: Fuhrbach, U., Dix, J., Nerode, A. (eds.) LPNMR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1265, pp. 364–375. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Niemelä, I., Simons, P.: Smodels — an implementation of the stable model and well-founded semantics for normal logic programs. In: Fuhrbach, U., Dix, J., Nerode, A. (eds.) LPNMR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1265, pp. 420–429. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Truszczyński, M., et al.: Towards Systematic Benchmarking in Answer Set Programming: The Dagstuhl Initiative. In: Lifschitz, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) LPNMR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2923, pp. 3–7. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Le Berre, D., Simon, L. (eds.): Special Volume on the SAT 2005 Competitions and Evaluations. Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation 2(1-4) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. http://asparagus.cs.uni-potsdam.de/contest

  18. http://asparagus.cs.uni-potsdam.de

  19. Leone, N., et al.: The DLV system for knowledge representation and reasoning. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 7(3), 499–562 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Syrjänen, T.: Lparse 1.0 user’s manual, http://www.tcs.hut.fi/Software/smodels/lparse.ps.gz

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Chitta Baral Gerhard Brewka John Schlipf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gebser, M., Liu, L., Namasivayam, G., Neumann, A., Schaub, T., Truszczyński, M. (2007). The First Answer Set Programming System Competition. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4483. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72200-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72200-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72199-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72200-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics