Abstract
The last years have witnessed an impressive growth in the number and quality of numerical dynamo simulations. The numerical models successfully describe many aspects of the geomagnetic field and also set out to explain the various fields of other planets. The success is somewhat surprising since numerical limitation force dynamo modelers to run their models at unrealistic parameters. In particular the Ekman number, a measure for the relative importance of viscous to Coriolis forces, is many orders of magnitude too large: Earth’s Ekman number is E = 10 − 15 while even today’s most advanced numerical simulations have to content themselves with E = 10 − 6. After giving a brief introduction into the basics of modern dynamo simulations the fundamental force balances are discussed and the question how well the modern models reproduce the geomagnetic field is addressed. First-level properties like the dipole dominance, realistic Elsasser and magnetic Reynolds numbers, and an Earth-like reversal behavior are already captured by larger Ekman number simulations around E = 10 − 3. However, low Ekman numbers are required for modeling torsional oscillations which are thought to be an important part of the decadal geomagnetic field variations. Moreover, only low Ekman number models seem to retain the huge dipole dominance of the geomagnetic field once the Rayleigh number has been increased to values where field reversals happen. These cases also seem to resemble the low-latitude field found at Earth’s core-mantle boundary more closely than larger Ekman numbers cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amit H, Olson P (2006) Time-averaged and time dependent parts of core flow. Phys Earth Planet Inter 155:120–139
Amit H, Olson P (2008) Geomagnetic dipole tilt changes induced by core flow. Phys Earth Planet Inter 166:226–238
Aubert J, Wicht J (2004) Axial versus equatorial dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields. Earth Planet Sci Lett 221: 409–419
Aubert J, Amit H, Hulot G (2007) Detecting thermal boundary control in surface flows from numerical dynamos. Phys Earth Planet Inter 160:143–156
Aubert J, Amit H, Hulot G, Olson P (2008a) Thermochemical flows couple the Earths inner core growth to mantle heterogeneity. Nature 454: 758–761
Aubert J, Aurnou J, Wicht J (2008b) The magnetic structure of convection-driven numerical dynamos. Geophys J Int 172:945–956
Bloxham J, Zatman S, Dumberry M (2002) The origin of geomagnetic jerks. Nature 420:65–68
Braginsky S (1970) Torsional magnetohydrodynamic vibrations in the Earth’s core and variation in day length. Geomag Aeron 10:1–8
Braginsky S, Roberts P (1995) Equations governing convection in Earth’s core and the geodynamo. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 79: 1–97
Breuer M, Wesseling S, Schmalzl J, Hansen U (2002) Effect of inertia in Rayleigh-B’enard convection. Phys Rev E 69:026320/1–10
Bullard EC, Gellman H (1954) Homogeneous dynamos and terrestrial magnetism. Proc R Soc Lond A A 247:213–278
Busse FH (2002) Is low Rayleigh number convection possible in the Earth’s core? Geophys Res Lett 29:070000–1
Busse FH, Simitev R (2005a) Convection in rotating spherical shells and its dynamo states. In: Soward AM, Jones CA, Hughes DW, Weiss NO (eds) Fluid dynamics and dynamos in astrophysics and geophysics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 359–392
Busse FH, Simitev R (2005b) Dynamos driven by convection in rotating spherical shells. Atronom Nachr 326: 231–240
Busse FH, Simitev RD (2006) Parameter dependences of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical fluid shells. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 100:341–361
Carlut J, Courtillot V (1998) How complex is the time-averaged geomagnetic field over the past 5 Myr? Geophys J Int 134:527–544
Chan K, Li L, Liao X (2006) Modelling the core convection using finite element and finite difference methods. Phys Earth Planet Inter 157:124–138
Chandrasekhar S (1961) Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability. Clarendon, Oxford
Christensen U, Aubert J (2006) Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and applications to planetary magnetic fields. Geophys J Int 116:97–114
Christensen U, Olson P (2003) Secular variation in numerical geodynamo models with lateral variations of boundary heat flow. Phys Earth Planet Inter 138:39–54
Christensen U, Tilgner A (2004) Power requirement of the geodynamo from Ohmic losses in numerical and laboratory dynamos. Nature 429:169—171
Christensen U, Wicht J (2007) Numerical dynamo simulations. In: Olson P (ed) Treatise on Geophysics, vol 8 (Core dynamics). Elsevier, New York, pp 245–282
Christensen UR (2002) Zonal flow driven by strongly supercritical convection in rotating spherical shells. Numerical Dynamo Simulations “Publisher:” Elsevier, New York J Fluid Mech 470:115–133
Christensen UR (2006) A deep rooted dynamo for Mercury. Nature 444:1056–1058
Christensen UR (2010) Dynamo Scaling Laws and Applications to the Planets. accepted for publication at Space. Sci Rev
Christensen UR, Aubert J, Busse FH et al (2001) A numerical dynamo benchmark. Phys Earth Planet Inter 128:25–34
Christensen UR, Holzwarth V, Reiners A (2009) Energy flux determines magnetic field strength of planets and stars. Nature 457:167–169
Clement B (2004) Dependency of the duration of geomagnetic polarity reversals on site latitude. Nature 428:637–640
Clune T, Eliott J, Miesch M, Toomre J, Glatzmaier G (1999) Computational aspects of a code to study rotating turbulent convection in spherical shells. Parallel Comp 25:361–380
Coe R, Hongre L, Glatzmaier A (2000) An examination of simulated geomagnetic reversals from a paleomagnetic perspective. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A358:1141–1170
Constable C (2000) On the rate of occurence of geomagnetic reversals. Phys Earth Planet Inter 118:181–193
Cowling T (1957) The dynamo maintainance of steady magnetic fields. Quart J Mech App Math 10:129–136
Dormy E, Cardin P, Jault D (1998) Mhd flow in a slightly differentially rotating spherical shell, with conducting inner core, in a dipolar magnetic field. Earth Planet Sci Lett 158:15–24
Eltayeb I (1972) Hydromagnetic convection in a rapidly rotating fluid layer. Proc R Soc Lond A 326:229–254
Eltayeb I (1975) Overstable hydromagnetic convection in a rotating fluid layer. J Fluid Mech 71:161–179
Fearn D (1979) Thermal and magnetic instabilities in a rapidly rotating fluid sphere. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 14:103–126
Fournier A, Bunge H-P, Hollerbach R, Vilotte J-P (2005) A Fourier-spectral element algorithm for thermal convection in rotating axisymmetric containers. J Comp Phys 204:462–489
Glatzmaier G (1984) Numerical simulation of stellar convective dynamos. 1. The model and methods. J Comput Phys 55:461–484
Glatzmaier G (2002) Geodynamo simulations — how realistic are they? Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 30:237–257
Glatzmaier G, Coe R (2007) Magnetic Polarity Reversals in the Core. In: Olson P (ed) Treatise on Geophysics, Vol 8, (Core dynamics). Elsevier, New York, pp 283–297
Glatzmaier G, Roberts P (1995) A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle. Phys Earth Planet Inter 91:63–75
Glatzmaier G, Roberts P (1996) An anelastic evolutionary geodynamo simulation driven by compositional and thermal convection. Physica D 97:81–94
Glatzmaier G, Coe R, Hongre L, Roberts P (1999) The role of the Earth’s mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversals. Nature 401:885–890
Gubbins D (2001) The Rayleigh number for convection in the Earth’s core. Phys Earth Planet Inter 128:3–12
Gubbins D, Kelly P (1993) Persistent patterns in the geomagnetic field over the past 2.5 ma. Nature 365:829–832
Gubbins D, Love J (1998) Preferred vgp paths during geomagnetic polarity reversals: Symmetry considerations. Geophys Res Lett 25: 1079–1082
Gubbins D, Willis AP, Sreenivasan B (2007) Correlation of Earth’s magnetic field with lower mantle thermal and seismic structure. Phys Earth Planet Inter 162:256–260
Harder H, Hansen U (2005) A finite-volume solution method for thermal convection and dynamo problems in spherical shells. Geophys J Int 161:522–532
Heimpel M, Aurnou J, Wicht J (2005) Simulation of equatorial and high-latitude jets on Jupiter in a deep convection model. Nature 438:193–196
Hejda P, Reshetnyak M (2003) Control volume method for the dynamo problem in the sphere with the free rotating inner core. Stud Geophys Geod 47:147–159
Hejda P, Reshetnyak M (2004) Control volume method for the thermal convection problem in a rotating spherical shell: test on the benchmark solution. Stud Geophys Geod, 48, 741–746
Hongre L, Hulot G, Khokholov A (1998) An analysis of the geomangetic field over the past 2000 years. Phys Earth Planet Inter 106:311–335
Hulot G, Bouligand C (2005) Statistical paleomagnetic field modelling and symmetry considerations. Geophys J Int 161, doi:10.1111/j.1365–246X.2005.02612.
Hulot G, Finlay C, Constable C, Olsen N, Mandea M (2010) The Magnetic Field of Planet Earth. accepted for publication at Space. Sci Rev
Isakov A, Descombes S, Dormy E (2004) An integro-differential formulation of magnet induction in bounded domains:boundary element-finite volume method. J Comp Phys 197:540–554
Ivers D, James R (1984) Axisymmetric antidynamo theorems in non-uniform compressible fluids. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 312:179–218
Jackson A (1997) Time dependence of geostrophic core-surface motions. Phys Earth Planet Inter 103:293–311
Jackson A (2003) Intense equatorial flux spots on the surface of the Earth’s core. Nature 424:760–763
Jackson A, Finlay C (2007) Geomagnetic secular variation and applications to the core. In: Kono M (ed) Treatise on geophysics, vol 5, (Geomagnetism). Elsevier, New York, pp 147–193
Jackson A, Jonkers A, Walker M (2000) Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 358:957–990
Jault D (2003) Electromagnetic and topographic coupling, and LOD variations. In: Jones CA, Soward AM, Zhang K (eds) Earth’s core and lower mantle. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 56–76
Jault D, Gire C, LeMouël J-L (1988) Westward drift, core motion and exchanges of angular momentum between core and mantle. Nature 333:353–356
Johnson C, Constable C (1995) Time averaged geomagnetic field as recorded by lava flows over the past 5 Myr. Geophys J Int 122:489–519
Johnson C, Constable C, Tauxe L (2003) Mapping long-term changed in Earth’s magnetic field. Science 300:2044–2045
Johnson CL, McFadden P (2007) Time-averaged field and paleosecular variation. In: Kono M (ed) Treatise on geophysics, vol 5, (Geomagnetism). Elsevier, New York, pp 217–254
Jones C, Roberts P (2000) The onset of magnetoconvection at large Prandtl number in a rotating layer II. Small magnetic diffusion. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 93:173–226
Jonkers A (2003) Long-range dependence in the cenozoic reversal record. Phys Earth Planet Inter 135:253–266
Kageyama A, Sato T (1995) Computer simulation of a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. II. Phys Plasmas 2:1421–1431
Kageyama A, Sato T (1997) Generation mechanism of a dipole field by a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo. Phys Rev E 55:4617–4626
Kageyama A, Watanabe K, Sato T (1993) Simulation study of a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo: Convection in a rotating shell. Phys Fluids B 24:2793–2806
Kageyama A, Miyagoshi T, Sato T (2008) Formation of current coils in geodynamo simulations. Nature 454:1106–1109
Kageyama A, Yoshida M (2005) Geodynamo and mantle convection simulations on the earth simulator using the yin-yang grid. J Phys Conf Ser 16:325–338
Kaiser R, Schmitt P, Busse F (1994) On the invisible dynamo. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 77:93–109
Kelly P, Gubbins D (1997) The geomagnetic field over the past 5 million years. Geophys J Int 128:315–330
Kono M, Roberts P (2002) Recent geodynamo simulations and observations of the geomagnetic field. Rev Geophys 40:1013, doi:10.1029/2000RG000102
Korte M, Constable C (2005) Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. cals7k. Geochem Geophys Geosys 6, Art No Q02H16
Korte M, Genevey A, Constable C, Frank U, Schnepp E (2005) Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 1. a new global data compilation. Geochem Geophys Geosys 6, Art No Q02H15
Kuang W, Bloxham J (1997) An Earth-like numerical dynamo model. Nature 389:371–374
Kuang W, Bloxham J (1999) Numerical modeling of magnetohydrodynamic convection in a rapidly rotating spherical shell: weak and strong field dynamo action. J Comp Phys 153:51–81
Kutzner C, Christensen U (2000) Effects of driving mechanisms in geodynamo models. Geophys Res Lett 27:29–32
Kutzner C, Christensen U (2002) From stable dipolar to reversing numerical dynamos. Phys Earth Planet Inter 131:29–45
Kutzner C, Christensen U (2004) Simulated geomagnetic reversals and preferred virtual geomagnetic pole paths. Geophys J Int 157: 1105–1118
Matsui H, Buffett B (2005) Sub-grid scale model for convection-driven dynamos in a rotating plane layer. submitted to Elsevier
Olsen N, Haagmans R, Sabaka TJ et al (2006) The Swarm End-to-End mission simulator study: A demonstration of separating the various contributions to Earth’s magnetic field using synthetic data. Earth Planets Space 58:359–370
Olson P, Christensen U (2002) The time-averaged magnetic field in numerical dynamos with nonuniform boundary heat flow. Geophys J Int 151:809–823
Olson P, Christensen U (2006) Dipole moment scaling for convection-driven planetary dynamos. Earth Planet Sci Lett 250:561–571
Olson P, Christensen U, Glatzmaier G (1999) Numerical modeling of the geodynamo: Mechanism of field generation and equilibration. J Geophys Res 104:10,383–10,404
Roberts P (1972) Kinematic dynamo models. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 271:663–697
Roberts P (2007) Theory of the geodynamo. In: Olson P (ed) Treatise on geophysics, vol 8, (Core dynamics). Elsevier, New York, pp 245–282
Roberts P, Jones C (2000) The onset of magnetoconvection at large Prandtl number in a rotating layer I. Finite magnetic diffusion. Theory of the Geodynamo Geophs Astrophys Fluid Dyn 92:289–325
Rotvig J, Jones C (2002) Rotating convection-driven dynamos at low ekman number. Phys Rev E 66:056308
Ryan DA, Sarson GR (2007) Are geomagnetic field reversals controlled by turbulence within the Earth’s core? Geophys Res Lett 34:2307
Sakuraba A (2002) Linear magnetoconvection in rotating fluid spheres permeated by a uniform axial magnetic field. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 96:291–318
Sakuraba A, Kono M (2000) Effect of a uniform magnetic field on nonlinear magnetocenvection in a rotating fluid spherical shell. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 92:255–287
Sakuraba A, Roberts P (2009) Generation of a strong magnetic field using uniform heat flux at the surface of the core. Nature Geosci 2:802–805
Schmalzl J, Breuer M, Hansen U (2002) The influence of the Prandtl number on the style of vigorous thermal convection. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 96:381–403
Simitev R, Busse F (2005) Prandtl-number dependence of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical fluid shells. J Fluid Mech 532:365–388
Simitev RD, Busse FH (2009) Bistability and hysteresis of dipolar dynamos generated by turbulent convection in rotating spherical shells. Europhys Lett 85:19001
Sreenivasan B, Jones CA (2006) The role of inertia in the evolution of spherical dynamos. Geophys J Int 164:467–476
St Pierre M (1993) The strong-field branch of the childress-soward dynamo. In Proctor MRE et al (eds) Solar and planetary dynamos, pp 329–337
Stanley S, Bloxham J (2004) Convective-region geometry as the cause of Uranus’ and Neptune’s unusual magnetic fields. Nature 428: 151–153
Stanley S, Glatzmaier G (2010) Dynamo models for planets other than earth. Space Science Reviews, DOI: 10.1007/s11214-009-9573-y, Only online so far.
Stanley S, Bloxham J, Hutchison W, Zuber M (2005) Thin shell dynamo models consistent with mercury’s weak observed magnetic field. Earth Planet Sci Lett DOI: 10.1007/s11214-009-9573-y 234:341–353
Stellmach S, Hansen U (2004) Cartesian convection-driven dynamos at low ekman number. Phys Rev E 70:056312
Stieglitz R, Müller U (2001) Experimental demonstration of the homogeneous two-scale dynamo. Phys Fluids 1:561–564
Takahashi F, Matsushima M (2006) Dipolar and non-dipolar dynamos in a thin shell geometry with implications for the magnetic field of Mercury. Geophys Res Lett 33:L10202
Takahashi F, Matsushima M, Honkura Y (2008a) Scale variability in convection-driven MHD dynamos at low Ekman number. Phys Earth Planet Inter 167:168–178
Takahashi F, Tsunakawa H, Matsushima M, Mochizuki N, Honkura Y (2008b) Effects of thermally heterogeneous structure in the lowermost mantle on the geomagnetic field strength. Earth Planet Sci Lett 272:738–746
Taylor J (1963) The magneto-hydrodynamics of a rotating fluid and the Earth’s dynamo problem. Proc R Soc Lond A 274:274–283
Tilgner A (1996) High-Rayleigh-number convection in spherical shells. Phys Rev E 53:4847–4851
Wicht J (2002) Inner-core conductivity in numerical dynamo simulations. Phys Earth Planet Inter 132:281–302
Wicht J (2005) Palaeomagnetic interpretation of dynamo simulations. Geophys J Int 162:371–380
Wicht J, Aubert J (2005) Dynamos in action. GWDG-Bericht 68:49–66
Wicht J, Christensen U (2010) Taylor state and torsional oscillations in numerical dynamo models. Geophys. J. Int. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04581.x, Published online only.
Wicht J, Olson P (2004) A detailed study of the polarity reversal mechanism in a numerical dynamo model. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 5, doi:10.1029/2003GC000602
Wicht J, Mandea M, Takahashi F et al (2007) The Origin of Mercury’s Internal Magnetic Field. Space Sci Rev 132:261–290
Wicht J, Stellmach S, Harder H (2009) Numerical models of the geodynamo: From fundamental Cartesian models to 3d simulations of field reversals. In: Glassmeier K, Soffel H, Negendank J (eds) Geomagnetic field variations – Space–time structure, processes, and effects on system Earth. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 107–158
Wicht J, Tilgner A (2010) Theory and modeling of planetary dynamos. Space Science Review, DOI: 10.1007/s11214-010-9638-y, Published online only.
Willis AP, Sreenivasan B, Gubbins D (2007) Thermal core mantle interaction: Exploring regimes for locked dynamo action. Phys Earth Planet Inter 165:83–92 DOI:10.1007/s11214-010- 9638-y
Zatman S, Bloxham J (1997) Torsional oscillations and the magnetic field within the Earth’s core. Nature 388:760–761
Zhang K, Gubbins D (2000a) Is the geodynamo process intrinsically unstable? Geophys J Int 140:F1–F4
Zhang K, Gubbins D (2000b) Scale disparities and magnetohydrodynamics in the Earth’s core. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 358: 899–920
Zhang K, Schubert G (2000) Magnetohydrodynamics in rapidly rotating spherical systems. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 32:409–433
Zhang K-K, Busse F (1988) Finite amplitude convection and magnetic field generation in in a rotating spherical shell. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 44:33–53
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wicht, J., Stellmach, S., Harder, H. (2010). Numerical Dynamo Simulations: From Basic Concepts to Realistic Models. In: Freeden, W., Nashed, M.Z., Sonar, T. (eds) Handbook of Geomathematics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01546-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01546-5_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01545-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01546-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering