Skip to main content

Traum oder Albtraum: Zusammenarbeit in Projektteams

  • Chapter
Angewandte Psychologie für Projektmanager

Zusammenfassung

Projektteams als moderne Organisationsform werden in nichtroutinemäßigen Aufgabenbereichen eingesetzt. Sie sind oft interdisziplinär, also aus unterschiedlichen Bereichen einer Organisation zusammengesetzt, und stehen besonderen Herausforderungen gegenüber. Insbesondere die Aufgabenbewältigung als zentrale Dimension der Zusammenarbeit im Team ist in Projektteams mit Schwierigkeiten verbunden. Damit gehen vermehrt Konflikte einher. Die Besonderheiten der Zusammenarbeit in Projektteams, Ansatzpunkte für Konfliktlösungen und Teamentwicklungsmaßnahmen werden nachfolgend aufgezeigt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Bouwen, R. & Fry, R. (1996). Facilitating group development: Interventions forarelational and contextual construction. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology(pp.531–552). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, F. C., Anderson, N. & West, M. A. (2000). Das Teamklima-Inventar (TKI). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote, S. & Kauffeld, S. (in Vorb.): Das Review von Projektteams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. & Chatman, J. A. (2000). „The Influence of Proportional and Perceptual Conflict Composition on Team Performance“, International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S. (2005). Mediating intragroup and intergroup conflict. In S. Wheelan (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 463–484). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. (2001). Teamdiagnose. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. (2004). Der Fragebogen zur Arbeit im Team (FAT). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S., Lorenzo, G. Montasem, K. & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2009). Act4teams® — die neue Dimension des Teamcoachings. In S. Kauffeld, S. Grote, E. Frieling (Hrsg.), Handbuch Kompetenzentwicklung. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keashley, L., Fisher, R. J. & Grant, P. R. (1993). The comparative utility of third party consultation and mediation within a complex simulation of intergroup conflict. Human Relations, 46, 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, PR., Zander, M.L., Knievel, E.M. & Tan, T. K. (2003). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letter-to-numbers problems: Informative equations and effective strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 684–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lechler, T. & Gemünden, H. G. (1998). Kausalanalyse der Wirkungsstruktur der Erfolgsfaktoren des Projektmanagements. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 58, 435–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. & Litterer, J. (1985). Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (1994). Personalentwicklung. Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B. & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V. & Poole, M. S. (1992). The effects on variations in capabilities of GDSS designs on management of cognitive conflicts in groups. Information Systems Research, 3, 224–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. K. & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1080–1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selin, G. & Selin, M. (1994). Reasons for project management success and failure in Multiproject Environment. IPMA Weltkongress Oslo, Band 2, 513–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, R. S., Dykema-Engblade, A. & Wittkowski, E. (2005). Conflict within and between groups. In S. Wheelan (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 313–328). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2004). Effective teamwork — practical lessons from organizational research. Exeter: BPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D. & Fortune, J. (2002). Current practice in project management — an empirical study. International Journal of Project Management 20, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kauffeld, S., Grote, S., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2009). Traum oder Albtraum: Zusammenarbeit in Projektteams. In: Angewandte Psychologie für Projektmanager. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88382-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics