Skip to main content

Evaluation of Healthcare IT Applications: The User Acceptance Perspective

  • Chapter
Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Healthcare-2

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 65))

As healthcare costs continue to spiral upward, healthcare institutions are under enormous pressure to create cost efficient systems without risking quality of care. Healthcare IT applications provide considerable promises for achieving this multifaceted goal through managing inofrmation, reducing costs, and facilitating total quality management and continuous quality improvement programs. However, the desired outcome can not be achieved if these applications are not being used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Adams, R. Nelson, and P. Todd, Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication, MIS Quarterly, 16 (1992), pp. 227-247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Agarwal and E. Karahanna, Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage, MIS Quarterly, 24 (2000), pp. 665-694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Agarwal and J. Prasad, The role of innovation characteristics and per-ceived voluntariness in the acceptation of information technologies, Decision Sci, 28(1997), pp. 557-582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?, Decision Sci, 30 (1999), pp. 361-391

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Ajzen, From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior, in Springer series in social psychology, J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann, eds., Springer, Berlin, 1985, pp. 11-39

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Ajzen, The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (1991), pp. 179-211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, M. Fishbein, and P. A. Muellerleile, Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis, Psychol Bull, 127 (2001), pp. 142-161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Anderson, S. Jay, H. Schweer, M. Anderson, and D. Kassing, Physi-cian communication networks and the adoption and utilization of computer applications in medicine, in Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine, J. G. Anderson and S. J. Jay, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987, pp. 185-199

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. G. Anderson, C. E. Aydin, and S. J. Jay, Evaluating Health Care Infor-mation Systems, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. J. Armitage and M. Conner, Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review, Br J Soc Psychol, 40 (2001), pp. 471-499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. E. Aydin, Occupational adaptation to computerized medical information sys-tems, J Health Soc Behav, 30 (1989), pp. 163-179

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Bandura, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  14. Social cognitive theory, in Annals of Child Development Vol. 6, R. Vasta, ed., Jai Press Ltd, Greenwich, CT, 1989, pp. 1-60

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Barki and J. Hartwick, Measuring user participation, use involvement, and user attitude, MIS Quarterly, 18 (1994), pp. 59-82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L. Beck and I. Ajzen, Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior, J of Research and Personality, 25 (1991), pp. 285-301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Blair and S. Burton, Cognitive process used by survey respondents to answer to behavioral frequency questions, J of Consumer Research, 14 (1987), pp. 280-288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. N. M. Bradburn, J. Huttenlocher, and L. Hedges, Telescoping and tem-poral memory, in Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports, N. Schwarz and S. Sudman, eds., Springer Verlag, New York, 1994, pp. 203-216

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. M. Bradburn, L. J. Rips, and S. K. Shevell, Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys, Science, 236 (1987), pp. 157-161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. S. Burt, Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equiv-alence, The American Journal of Sociology, 92 (1987), pp. 1287-1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Chang, Y. S. Hsu, Y. M. Tzeng, Y. Y. Sang, I. C. Hou, and W. F. Kao, The development of intelligent, triage-based, mass-gathering emergency medical service PDA support systems, J Nurs Res, 12 (2004), pp. 227-236

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Y. K. Chau and P. J. H. Hu, Information technology acceptance by profes-sionals: A model comparison approach, Decision Sciences, 32 (2001), pp. 699-719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ——, Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study, J of Management Information Systems, 18 (2002), pp. 191-229

    Google Scholar 

  24. ——, Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions on telemedicine technol-ogy acceptance: An empirical test of competing theories, Information and Man-agement, 39 (2002), pp. 297-311

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Chen, M. Czerwinski, and R. Macredie, Individual differences in vir-tual environments - introduction and overview, J of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (2000), pp. 499-507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. W. W. Chin, The measurement and meaning of IT usage: reconciling recent dis-crepancies between self reported and computer recorded usage, in Proceedings of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Information Systems Divi-sion, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1996, pp. 65-74

    Google Scholar 

  27. W. G. Chismar and S. Wiley-Patton, Test of the technology acceptance model for the internet in pediatrics, Proc AMIA Symp, (2002), pp. 155-159

    Google Scholar 

  28. ——, Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians, in HICSS ’03: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-36), Washington, DC, USA, 2003, IEEE Computer Society, p. 160

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. E. Clarke and A. Aish, An exploration of health beliefs and attitudes of smokers with vascular disease who participate in or decline a smoking cessation program, J Vasc Nurs, 20 (2002), pp. 96-105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Coleman, E. Katz, and H. Menzel, Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study, Bobbs-Merrill, New York: NY, 1966. 2nd

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. B. Cooper and R. W. Zmud, Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach, Manage. Sci., 36 (1990), pp. 123-139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. F. D. Davis, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results, PhD thesis, Sloan School of Manage-ment, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  33. ——, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of infor-mation technology, MIS Quarterly, 13 (1989), pp. 319-342

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts, Int J Human-Computer Studies, 38 (1993), pp. 475-487

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, User acceptance of com-puter technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Sci, 35 (1989), pp. 982-1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. T. J. DeMaio, Social desirability and survey measurement: a review, in Sur-veying subjective phenomena, C. F. Turner and E. Martin, eds., Russell Sage, New York, 1984, pp. 257-281

    Google Scholar 

  37. D.R. Dixon and M. Stewart, Exploring information technology adoption by family physicians: survey instrument valuation, Proc AMIA Symp, (2000), pp. 185-189

    Google Scholar 

  38. W. J. Doll and M. U. Ahmed, Managing user expectations, J of Systems Management, 34 (1983), pp. 6-11

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. M. Eisenberg, D. S. Kitz, and R. A. Webber, Development of attitudes about sharing decision-making: a comparison of medical and surgical residents, J Health Soc Behav, 24 (1983), pp. 85-90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Beliefs, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Intro-duction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. P. Gagnon, G. Godin, C. Gagne, J. P. Fortin, L. Lamothe, D. Reinharz, and A. Cloutier, An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians, Int J Med Inform, 71 (2003), pp. 103-115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. C. A. Gaither, R. P. Bagozzi, F. J. Ascione, and D. M. Kirking, A reasoned action approach to physicians’ utilization of drug information sources, Pharm Res, 13 (1996), pp. 1291-1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. C. L. Gatch and K. D, Predicting exercise intentions: the theory of planned behavior, Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sport, 61 (1990), pp. 100-102

    Google Scholar 

  44. D. Gefen and D. Straub, Gender difference in the perception and use of E-Mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model, MIS Quarterly, 21 (1997), pp. 389-400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. G. Godin, P. Valois, L. Lepage, and R. Desharnais, Predictors of smoking behavior: an application of Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior, British Journal of Addition, 87 (1992), pp. 1335-1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. M. S. Hagger, N. L. D. Chatzisarantis, and S. J. H. Biddle, Meta-analysis of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: an examination of predictive validity and the contri-bution of additional variables, J of Sport and Exercise Psychol, 24 (2002), pp. 3-32

    Google Scholar 

  47. C. Hartley, M. Brecht, P. Pagerly, G. Weeks, A. Chapanis, and D. Hoecker, Subjective time estimates of work tasks by office workers, J of Occupational Psychology, 50 (1977), pp. 23-36

    Google Scholar 

  48. P. Hu, P. Y. K. Chau, O. R. L. Sheng, and K. Y. Tam, Examining the tech-nology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology, J of Management Information Systems, 16 (1999), pp. 91-112

    Google Scholar 

  49. G. S. Hubona and P. H. Cheney, System effectiveness of knowledge-based technology: the relationship of user performance and attitudinal measures, in HICSS ’94: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-27) Volume 4, Washington, DC, USA, 1994, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 532-541

    Google Scholar 

  50. M. Igbaria, T. Guimaraes, and G. B. Davis, Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model, J of MIS, 11 (1995), pp. 87-114

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. Igbaria, J. Iivari, and H. Maragahh, Why do individuals use com-puter technology? a Finnish case study, Information & Management, 29 (1995), pp. 227-238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. B. Kaplan, Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical sys-tems, Academy of Management Journal, 4 (1997), pp. 94-101

    Google Scholar 

  53. Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: the-ory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism, Int J Med Inform, 64 (2001), pp. 39-56

    Google Scholar 

  54. E. Karahanna, D. W. Straub, and N. L. Chervany, Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs, MIS Quarterly, 23 (1999), pp. 183-213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Y. Kashima, C. Gallois, and M. McCamish, Theory of reasoned action and cooperative behavior: it takes two to use a condom, British Journal of Social Psychology, 32 (1993), pp. 227-239

    Google Scholar 

  56. H. C. Kelman, Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change?, J of Conflict Resolution, 2 (1958), pp. 51-60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. T. H. Kwon and R. W. Zmud, Unifying the fragmented models of informa-tion systems implementation, in Critical issues in information systems research, R. J. Boland and R. A. Hirschheim, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, England, 1987, pp. 227-251

    Google Scholar 

  58. Y. Lee, K. A. Kozar, and K. R. T. Larsen, The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future, Communications of the AIS, 12 (2003), pp. 752-780

    Google Scholar 

  59. F. Legare, G. Godin, V. Ringa, S. Dodin, L. Turcot, and J. Norton, Variation in the psychosocial determinants of the intention to prescribe hormone therapy prior to the release of the Women’s Health Initiative trial: a survey of general practitioners and gynaecologists in France and Quebec, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 5 (2005), p. 31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. H. P. Lundsgaarde, P. A. Fischer, and D. J. Steele, Human problems in computerized medicine, in Publications in Anthropology, 13, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  61. Y. Malhotra and D. F. Galletta, Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoritical bases and empirical validation, in HICSS ’99: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (32), vol. 1, Washington, DC, USA, 1999, IEEE Computer Society, p. 1006

    Google Scholar 

  62. T. A. Massaro, Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: I. impact on organizational couture and behavior, Acad Med, 68 (1993), pp. 20-25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. K. Mathieson, Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior, Information Systems Research, 2 (1991), pp. 173-191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. K. Mathieson, E. Peacock, and W. W. Chin, Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources, ACM SIGMIS Data-base, 32 (2001), pp. 86-112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. S. K. Maue, R. Segal, C. L. Kimberlin, and E. E. Lipowski, Predict-ing physician guideline compliance: an assessment of motivators and perceived barriers, The American J of Managed Care, 10 (2004), pp. 382-391

    Google Scholar 

  66. E. Mayo, The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, MacMillan, New York, NY, USA, 1933

    Google Scholar 

  67. G. C. Moore and I. Benbasat, Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Information Systems Research, 2 (1991), pp. 173-191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. D. M. Morrison, M. S. Spencer, and M. R. Gillmore, Beliefs about sub-stance use among pregnant and parenting adolescents, J Res Adolesc, 8 (1998), pp. 69-95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. R. S. Nickerson, Why interactive computer systems are sometimes not used by people who might benefit from them, Int J Human-Computer Studies, 51 (1999), pp. 307-321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. M. H. Olson and H. C. Lucas, The impact of office automation on the organi-zation: some implications for research and practice, Commun ACM, 25 (1982), pp. 838-847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. G. Paré, C. Sicotte, and H. Jacques, The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians’ acceptance of clinical information systems, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 13 (2006), pp. 197-205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. D. Parker, A. S. R. Manstead, S. G. Stradling, and J. Reason, Intention to commit driving violations: An application of the theory of planned behavior, J of Applied Psychology, 77 (1992), pp. 94-101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. M. B. Prescott and S. A. Conger, Information technology innovations: a classification by it locus of impact and research approach, SIGMIS Database, 26 (1995), pp. 20-41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, 1983. 3rd ed

    Google Scholar 

  75. ——, Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, 1995. 4th ed

    Google Scholar 

  76. V. Sambamurthy and C. W.W., The effects of group attitudes toward alter-native gdss designs on the decision-making performance of computer-supported groups, Decision Sciences, 25 (1994), pp. 215-241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. N. Schwarz and D. Oyserman, Asking questions about behavior: cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction, American J of Evaluation, 22 (2001), pp. 127-160

    Google Scholar 

  78. A. Sharma, Professionals as agent: knowledge asymmetry in agengy exchanges, Academy of Management Review, 22 (1997), pp. 758-798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. B. H. Sheppard, J. Hartwick, and P. R. Warshaw, The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research, J of Consumer Behavior, 15 (1988), pp. 325-343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. D. E. Sichel, The Computer Revolution: An Economic Perspective, Brookings, Washington, DC, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  81. D. Straub, M. Keil, and W. Brenner, Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study, Information & Management, 33 (1997), pp. 1-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. J. Stross and G. Bole, Evaluation of a continuing education program in rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis and rheumatism, Arthritis Rheum, 23 (1980), pp. 846-849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. G. Subramanian, A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement, Decision Sciences, 25 (1994), pp. 863-874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. M. J. Succi and Z. D. Walter, Theory of user acceptance of information technologies: an examination of health care professionals, in HICSS ’99: Proceed-ings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32), Los Alamitos, CA, 1999, IEEE Computer Society

    Google Scholar 

  85. H. Sun and P. Zhang, The role of moderating factors in user technology accep-tance, Int J Human-Computer Studies, 64 (2006), pp. 53-78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. E. B. Swanson, Information System Implementation: Bridging the Gap between Design and Utilization, Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  87. B. Szajna, Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model, Management Sci, 42 (1996), pp. 85-92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. S. Taylor and P. Todd, Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing model, Information Systems Research, 6 (1995), pp. 145-176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. R. L. Thompson, C. A. Higgins, and J. M. Howell, Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization, MIS Quarterly, 15 (1991), pp. 124-143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. ——, Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: testing a concep-tual model, Journal of Management Information Systems, 11 (1994), pp. 167-187

    Google Scholar 

  91. L. Tornatzky and K. Klein, Innovation characteristics and innovation adop-tion implementation: a meta-analysis of findings, IEEE Transactions on Engi-neering Management, 29 (1982), pp. 28-45

    Google Scholar 

  92. M. L. Tushman and T. J. Scanlan, Boundary spanning individuals: their role in information-transfer and their antecedents, Academy of Management Journal, 24 (1981), pp. 289-305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. V. Venkatesh, Determinants of perceived ease of use integrating control, intrin-sic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model, Information Systems Research, 11 (2000), pp. 342-365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use development and test, Decision Sciences, 27 (1996), pp. 451-481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitu-dinal field studies, Management Sci, 46 (2000), pp. 186-204

    Google Scholar 

  96. V. Venkatesh and M. G. Morris, Why don’t men ever stop to ask for direc-tions? gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior, MIS Quarterly, 24 (2000), pp. 115-139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, User accep-tance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly, 27 (2003), pp. 425-478

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zheng, K., Padman, R., Johnson, M.P., Diamond, H.S. (2007). Evaluation of Healthcare IT Applications: The User Acceptance Perspective. In: Vaidya, S., Jain, L.C., Yoshida, H. (eds) Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Healthcare-2. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 65. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72375-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72375-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72374-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72375-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics